Impact of regulations on innovation in the field of medical devices
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research on Biomedical Engineering (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2446-47402018000400356 |
Resumo: | Abstract Introduction The regulatory framework and standardized assay methods for classical biomaterials and implantable devices are harmonized at the international level, based on the risk assessment. However, innovative products need the development of more appropriate assay methods and streamline regulatory and scientific evaluation to encourage innovation and ensure more expedite delivery of novel, safe and effective innovative medical devices to patients. The aim of this work is to review the latest focus on the conflicting issues that are involved in the evaluation of recently developed biomaterials and medical devices. Methods This paper is based on a review of the relevant academic literature regarding the field of medical devices over the last ten years (2008-2017). A systematic search was conducted in Medline data base for articles using “medical devices” + “regulations” + “innovation” in the title or abstract. Discussion There is the widespread perception that research and marketing of innovative medical devices are moving swifter, even more so than the issues concerning evaluation methods and regulations. Collaboration among all the stakeholders could contribute to overcome the existing problems in medical device innovation. |
id |
SBEB-1_8bb2f7fdf29a64e5d1aa8113e8f70052 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2446-47402018000400356 |
network_acronym_str |
SBEB-1 |
network_name_str |
Research on Biomedical Engineering (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Impact of regulations on innovation in the field of medical devicesMedical devicesRegulationsInnovationAbstract Introduction The regulatory framework and standardized assay methods for classical biomaterials and implantable devices are harmonized at the international level, based on the risk assessment. However, innovative products need the development of more appropriate assay methods and streamline regulatory and scientific evaluation to encourage innovation and ensure more expedite delivery of novel, safe and effective innovative medical devices to patients. The aim of this work is to review the latest focus on the conflicting issues that are involved in the evaluation of recently developed biomaterials and medical devices. Methods This paper is based on a review of the relevant academic literature regarding the field of medical devices over the last ten years (2008-2017). A systematic search was conducted in Medline data base for articles using “medical devices” + “regulations” + “innovation” in the title or abstract. Discussion There is the widespread perception that research and marketing of innovative medical devices are moving swifter, even more so than the issues concerning evaluation methods and regulations. Collaboration among all the stakeholders could contribute to overcome the existing problems in medical device innovation.Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica2018-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2446-47402018000400356Research on Biomedical Engineering v.34 n.4 2018reponame:Research on Biomedical Engineering (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica (SBEB)instacron:SBEB10.1590/2446-4740.180054info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGuerra-Bretaña,Rosa MayelinFlórez-Rendón,Andrea Lucíaeng2019-01-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2446-47402018000400356Revistahttp://www.rbejournal.org/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbe@rbejournal.org2446-47402446-4732opendoar:2019-01-21T00:00Research on Biomedical Engineering (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica (SBEB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Impact of regulations on innovation in the field of medical devices |
title |
Impact of regulations on innovation in the field of medical devices |
spellingShingle |
Impact of regulations on innovation in the field of medical devices Guerra-Bretaña,Rosa Mayelin Medical devices Regulations Innovation |
title_short |
Impact of regulations on innovation in the field of medical devices |
title_full |
Impact of regulations on innovation in the field of medical devices |
title_fullStr |
Impact of regulations on innovation in the field of medical devices |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impact of regulations on innovation in the field of medical devices |
title_sort |
Impact of regulations on innovation in the field of medical devices |
author |
Guerra-Bretaña,Rosa Mayelin |
author_facet |
Guerra-Bretaña,Rosa Mayelin Flórez-Rendón,Andrea Lucía |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Flórez-Rendón,Andrea Lucía |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Guerra-Bretaña,Rosa Mayelin Flórez-Rendón,Andrea Lucía |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Medical devices Regulations Innovation |
topic |
Medical devices Regulations Innovation |
description |
Abstract Introduction The regulatory framework and standardized assay methods for classical biomaterials and implantable devices are harmonized at the international level, based on the risk assessment. However, innovative products need the development of more appropriate assay methods and streamline regulatory and scientific evaluation to encourage innovation and ensure more expedite delivery of novel, safe and effective innovative medical devices to patients. The aim of this work is to review the latest focus on the conflicting issues that are involved in the evaluation of recently developed biomaterials and medical devices. Methods This paper is based on a review of the relevant academic literature regarding the field of medical devices over the last ten years (2008-2017). A systematic search was conducted in Medline data base for articles using “medical devices” + “regulations” + “innovation” in the title or abstract. Discussion There is the widespread perception that research and marketing of innovative medical devices are moving swifter, even more so than the issues concerning evaluation methods and regulations. Collaboration among all the stakeholders could contribute to overcome the existing problems in medical device innovation. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2446-47402018000400356 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2446-47402018000400356 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/2446-4740.180054 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research on Biomedical Engineering v.34 n.4 2018 reponame:Research on Biomedical Engineering (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica (SBEB) instacron:SBEB |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica (SBEB) |
instacron_str |
SBEB |
institution |
SBEB |
reponame_str |
Research on Biomedical Engineering (Online) |
collection |
Research on Biomedical Engineering (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research on Biomedical Engineering (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica (SBEB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbe@rbejournal.org |
_version_ |
1752126289005772800 |