Absorbed doses in salivary and thyroid glands from panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Heiden,Katia Regina
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Rocha,Anna Silvia Penteado Setti da, Filipov,Danielle, Salazar,Cristina Berrocal, Fernandes,Ângela, Westphalen,Fernando Henrique, Setti,João Antonio Palma
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Research on Biomedical Engineering (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2446-47402018000100031
Resumo: Abstract Introduction: Panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) are very important in the diagnosis of oral diseases, however patients are exposed to the risk of ionizing radiation. This paper describes our study aimed at comparing absorbed doses in the salivary glands and thyroid due to panoramic radiography and CBCT and estimating radiation induced cancer risk associated with those methods. Methods Absorbed doses of two CBCT equipment (i-CAT® Next Generation and SCANORA® 3D) and a digital panoramic device (ORTHOPANTOMOGRAPH® OP200D) were measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters loaded in an anthropomorphic phantom on sublingual, submandibular, parotid and thyroid glands. Results Absorbed doses in the i-CAT® device ranged between 0.02 (+/-0.01) and 2.23 mGy (+/-0.03), in the SCANORA™ device ranged from 0.01 (+/-0.01) to 2.96 mGy (+/-0.29) and in the ORTHOPANTOMOGRAPH® OP200D ranged between 0.04 mGy and 0.78 mGy. The radiation induced cancer risk was highlighted in the salivary glands, which received higher doses. The protocols that offer the highest risk of cancer are the high resolution protocols of CBCT equipment. Conclusion CBCT exposes patients to higher levels of radiation than panoramic radiography, so the risks and benefits of each method should be considered. The doses in CBCT were dependent on equipment and exposure parameters, therefore adequate selection minimizes the radiation dose.
id SBEB-1_b5c833f2aa11c81aef3cba3a509233cc
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2446-47402018000100031
network_acronym_str SBEB-1
network_name_str Research on Biomedical Engineering (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Absorbed doses in salivary and thyroid glands from panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomographyCone beam computed tomographyPanoramic radiographRadiation doseThermoluminescent dosimetryAbstract Introduction: Panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) are very important in the diagnosis of oral diseases, however patients are exposed to the risk of ionizing radiation. This paper describes our study aimed at comparing absorbed doses in the salivary glands and thyroid due to panoramic radiography and CBCT and estimating radiation induced cancer risk associated with those methods. Methods Absorbed doses of two CBCT equipment (i-CAT® Next Generation and SCANORA® 3D) and a digital panoramic device (ORTHOPANTOMOGRAPH® OP200D) were measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters loaded in an anthropomorphic phantom on sublingual, submandibular, parotid and thyroid glands. Results Absorbed doses in the i-CAT® device ranged between 0.02 (+/-0.01) and 2.23 mGy (+/-0.03), in the SCANORA™ device ranged from 0.01 (+/-0.01) to 2.96 mGy (+/-0.29) and in the ORTHOPANTOMOGRAPH® OP200D ranged between 0.04 mGy and 0.78 mGy. The radiation induced cancer risk was highlighted in the salivary glands, which received higher doses. The protocols that offer the highest risk of cancer are the high resolution protocols of CBCT equipment. Conclusion CBCT exposes patients to higher levels of radiation than panoramic radiography, so the risks and benefits of each method should be considered. The doses in CBCT were dependent on equipment and exposure parameters, therefore adequate selection minimizes the radiation dose.Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2446-47402018000100031Research on Biomedical Engineering v.34 n.1 2018reponame:Research on Biomedical Engineering (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica (SBEB)instacron:SBEB10.1590/2446-4740.03717info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHeiden,Katia ReginaRocha,Anna Silvia Penteado Setti daFilipov,DanielleSalazar,Cristina BerrocalFernandes,ÂngelaWestphalen,Fernando HenriqueSetti,João Antonio Palmaeng2018-04-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2446-47402018000100031Revistahttp://www.rbejournal.org/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbe@rbejournal.org2446-47402446-4732opendoar:2018-04-18T00:00Research on Biomedical Engineering (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica (SBEB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Absorbed doses in salivary and thyroid glands from panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography
title Absorbed doses in salivary and thyroid glands from panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography
spellingShingle Absorbed doses in salivary and thyroid glands from panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography
Heiden,Katia Regina
Cone beam computed tomography
Panoramic radiograph
Radiation dose
Thermoluminescent dosimetry
title_short Absorbed doses in salivary and thyroid glands from panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography
title_full Absorbed doses in salivary and thyroid glands from panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography
title_fullStr Absorbed doses in salivary and thyroid glands from panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Absorbed doses in salivary and thyroid glands from panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography
title_sort Absorbed doses in salivary and thyroid glands from panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography
author Heiden,Katia Regina
author_facet Heiden,Katia Regina
Rocha,Anna Silvia Penteado Setti da
Filipov,Danielle
Salazar,Cristina Berrocal
Fernandes,Ângela
Westphalen,Fernando Henrique
Setti,João Antonio Palma
author_role author
author2 Rocha,Anna Silvia Penteado Setti da
Filipov,Danielle
Salazar,Cristina Berrocal
Fernandes,Ângela
Westphalen,Fernando Henrique
Setti,João Antonio Palma
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Heiden,Katia Regina
Rocha,Anna Silvia Penteado Setti da
Filipov,Danielle
Salazar,Cristina Berrocal
Fernandes,Ângela
Westphalen,Fernando Henrique
Setti,João Antonio Palma
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cone beam computed tomography
Panoramic radiograph
Radiation dose
Thermoluminescent dosimetry
topic Cone beam computed tomography
Panoramic radiograph
Radiation dose
Thermoluminescent dosimetry
description Abstract Introduction: Panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) are very important in the diagnosis of oral diseases, however patients are exposed to the risk of ionizing radiation. This paper describes our study aimed at comparing absorbed doses in the salivary glands and thyroid due to panoramic radiography and CBCT and estimating radiation induced cancer risk associated with those methods. Methods Absorbed doses of two CBCT equipment (i-CAT® Next Generation and SCANORA® 3D) and a digital panoramic device (ORTHOPANTOMOGRAPH® OP200D) were measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters loaded in an anthropomorphic phantom on sublingual, submandibular, parotid and thyroid glands. Results Absorbed doses in the i-CAT® device ranged between 0.02 (+/-0.01) and 2.23 mGy (+/-0.03), in the SCANORA™ device ranged from 0.01 (+/-0.01) to 2.96 mGy (+/-0.29) and in the ORTHOPANTOMOGRAPH® OP200D ranged between 0.04 mGy and 0.78 mGy. The radiation induced cancer risk was highlighted in the salivary glands, which received higher doses. The protocols that offer the highest risk of cancer are the high resolution protocols of CBCT equipment. Conclusion CBCT exposes patients to higher levels of radiation than panoramic radiography, so the risks and benefits of each method should be considered. The doses in CBCT were dependent on equipment and exposure parameters, therefore adequate selection minimizes the radiation dose.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2446-47402018000100031
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2446-47402018000100031
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2446-4740.03717
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research on Biomedical Engineering v.34 n.1 2018
reponame:Research on Biomedical Engineering (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica (SBEB)
instacron:SBEB
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica (SBEB)
instacron_str SBEB
institution SBEB
reponame_str Research on Biomedical Engineering (Online)
collection Research on Biomedical Engineering (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research on Biomedical Engineering (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica (SBEB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbe@rbejournal.org
_version_ 1752126288776134656