Evaluating buffer zones of Protected Areas in urbanized areas: the case of the municipality of Sorocaba (SP, Brazil)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismo |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/ecoturismo/article/view/12844 |
Resumo: | The discussion and projects of buffer zones (ZA) surrounding urban protected areas are significant challenges. Design the limits of the ZA must consider technical-scientific criteria, such as land-use/land-cover, river network, environmental, and social aspects. It can promote an ecologically sustainable urban environment that brings resilience to biodiversity, ensuring equity in providing ecosystem services to the entire urban population. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the landscape structure around urban protected areas, using geoprocessing technique and Landscape Ecology, supplying subsidy for the proposition of a common ZA to urban protected areas in the municipality of Sorocaba. The average Euclidean distance between the PAs of Sorocaba is 4,782.24 m. The Municipal Natural Park of “Corredores da Biodiversidade” is the most isolated area from other PAs. The “Bráulio Guedes da Silva” Ecological Station is the smallest PA in the municipality (8.9 ha). It is the only one that does not support a forest remnant surrounding the protected limits. The mapped area mainly comprises anthropic land-use, which corresponds to more than 78% of land use. The majority being occupied by urban areas and anthropic fields with pioneer vegetation. The native forest cover is distributed among 706 remnants, with 84.14% having no more than ten (10) hectares. These small remnants are close to each other (NEAR < 50m), thus favoring connectivity achieved through ecological springboards. The anthropic fields of pioneer vegetation identified in the study can serve forest restoration projects, playing an essential role in mitigating forest fragmentation. These lands can improve forest structure and landscape connectivity, promote the connection between PAs and other forest fragments on the landscape. |
id |
SBECOTUR-1_811644a1de57a1dc1ec09ad64373d2b1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12844 |
network_acronym_str |
SBECOTUR-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismo |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluating buffer zones of Protected Areas in urbanized areas: the case of the municipality of Sorocaba (SP, Brazil)Avaliando zonas de amortecimento de Unidades de Conservação em áreas urbanizadas: o caso do município de Sorocaba (SP)Buffer Zoneurban planningurban ecological networkrestorationGISZona de Amortecimentoplanejamento urbanoRedes ecológicas urbanasreflorestamentogeoprocessamentoThe discussion and projects of buffer zones (ZA) surrounding urban protected areas are significant challenges. Design the limits of the ZA must consider technical-scientific criteria, such as land-use/land-cover, river network, environmental, and social aspects. It can promote an ecologically sustainable urban environment that brings resilience to biodiversity, ensuring equity in providing ecosystem services to the entire urban population. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the landscape structure around urban protected areas, using geoprocessing technique and Landscape Ecology, supplying subsidy for the proposition of a common ZA to urban protected areas in the municipality of Sorocaba. The average Euclidean distance between the PAs of Sorocaba is 4,782.24 m. The Municipal Natural Park of “Corredores da Biodiversidade” is the most isolated area from other PAs. The “Bráulio Guedes da Silva” Ecological Station is the smallest PA in the municipality (8.9 ha). It is the only one that does not support a forest remnant surrounding the protected limits. The mapped area mainly comprises anthropic land-use, which corresponds to more than 78% of land use. The majority being occupied by urban areas and anthropic fields with pioneer vegetation. The native forest cover is distributed among 706 remnants, with 84.14% having no more than ten (10) hectares. These small remnants are close to each other (NEAR < 50m), thus favoring connectivity achieved through ecological springboards. The anthropic fields of pioneer vegetation identified in the study can serve forest restoration projects, playing an essential role in mitigating forest fragmentation. These lands can improve forest structure and landscape connectivity, promote the connection between PAs and other forest fragments on the landscape.A discussão e projetos de desenvolvimento de zonas de amortecimento (ZA) no entorno de áreas protegidas urbanas é considerado um grande desafio. A delimitação da ZA deve levar em consideração critérios técnico-científicos, tais como, de uso e ocupação da terra, critérios hidrográficos, critérios ambientais e sociais, para que dessa forma possa se estabelecer um ambiente urbano ecologicamente sustentáveis e que traga resiliência para a biodiversidade, garantindo equidade no provimento de serviços ecossistêmicos para a toda a população urbana. Sendo assim, este estudo objetivou avaliar a estrutura da paisagem nos entornos das áreas protegidas urbanas, utilizando técnicas de geoprocessamento e Ecologia de Paisagem, visando fornecer subsídios à proposição de uma ZA comum às áreas protegidas urbanas do município de Sorocaba. A distância euclidiana média entre as Unidades de Conservação (UCs) de Sorocaba é de 4.782,24 m, e o Parque Natural Municipal de Corredores da Biodiversidade é o mais distante de outras UCs. A Estação Ecológica Bráulio Guedes da Silva, é a menor UC do município (8,9 ha) é a única que não tem o suporte de um remanescente fora dos limites protegidos. A área mapeada é composta majoritariamente pelo uso antrópico da terra, que corresponde a mais de 78% do uso da terra, sendo a maior parte ocupada por áreas urbanas e campos antrópicos de vegetação pioneira. A cobertura florestal nativa, está distribuída entre 706 remanescentes, sendo que 84,14% não possuem mais que dez (10) hectares. Apesar de pequenos, os remanescentes estão próximos entre si (NEAR < 50m), favorecendo dessa forma a conectividade, conquistada através de trampolins ecológicos. Os campos antrópicos de vegetação pioneira apontados na área de estudo podem servir a projetos de restauração florestal, desempenhando um papel importante na mitigação dos impactos da fragmentação florestal, melhorando a estrutura florestal e a conectividade da paisagem, promovendo a conexão entre as áreas protegidas urbanas e outros fragmentos florestais.Universidade Federal de São Paulo2021-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado por Comitês coordenado pelos Editores Convidadosapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/ecoturismo/article/view/1284410.34024/rbecotur.2021.v14.12844Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismo (RBEcotur); v. 14 n. 5 (2021): Dossiê organizado pelo PPGSGA - UFSCar/SorocabaBrazilian Journal of Ecotourism; Vol. 14 No. 5 (2021): Dossiê organizado pelo PPGSGA - UFSCar/SorocabaRevista Brasileña de Ecoturismo; Vol. 14 Núm. 5 (2021): Dossiê organizado pelo PPGSGA - UFSCar/Sorocaba1983-9391reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismoinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ecoturismo (SBECotur)instacron:SBECOTURporhttps://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/ecoturismo/article/view/12844/8974Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismo (RBEcotur)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMello, Kaline deRibeiro, Marina PannunzioValente, Roberta Averna2021-12-01T09:37:07Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12844Revistahttps://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/ecoturismo/indexPUBhttp://www.sbecotur.org.br/rbecotur/seer/index.php/ecoturismo/oai||zneiman@gmail.com1983-93911983-9391opendoar:2021-12-01T09:37:07Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismo - Sociedade Brasileira de Ecoturismo (SBECotur)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluating buffer zones of Protected Areas in urbanized areas: the case of the municipality of Sorocaba (SP, Brazil) Avaliando zonas de amortecimento de Unidades de Conservação em áreas urbanizadas: o caso do município de Sorocaba (SP) |
title |
Evaluating buffer zones of Protected Areas in urbanized areas: the case of the municipality of Sorocaba (SP, Brazil) |
spellingShingle |
Evaluating buffer zones of Protected Areas in urbanized areas: the case of the municipality of Sorocaba (SP, Brazil) Mello, Kaline de Buffer Zone urban planning urban ecological network restoration GIS Zona de Amortecimento planejamento urbano Redes ecológicas urbanas reflorestamento geoprocessamento |
title_short |
Evaluating buffer zones of Protected Areas in urbanized areas: the case of the municipality of Sorocaba (SP, Brazil) |
title_full |
Evaluating buffer zones of Protected Areas in urbanized areas: the case of the municipality of Sorocaba (SP, Brazil) |
title_fullStr |
Evaluating buffer zones of Protected Areas in urbanized areas: the case of the municipality of Sorocaba (SP, Brazil) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluating buffer zones of Protected Areas in urbanized areas: the case of the municipality of Sorocaba (SP, Brazil) |
title_sort |
Evaluating buffer zones of Protected Areas in urbanized areas: the case of the municipality of Sorocaba (SP, Brazil) |
author |
Mello, Kaline de |
author_facet |
Mello, Kaline de Ribeiro, Marina Pannunzio Valente, Roberta Averna |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ribeiro, Marina Pannunzio Valente, Roberta Averna |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mello, Kaline de Ribeiro, Marina Pannunzio Valente, Roberta Averna |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Buffer Zone urban planning urban ecological network restoration GIS Zona de Amortecimento planejamento urbano Redes ecológicas urbanas reflorestamento geoprocessamento |
topic |
Buffer Zone urban planning urban ecological network restoration GIS Zona de Amortecimento planejamento urbano Redes ecológicas urbanas reflorestamento geoprocessamento |
description |
The discussion and projects of buffer zones (ZA) surrounding urban protected areas are significant challenges. Design the limits of the ZA must consider technical-scientific criteria, such as land-use/land-cover, river network, environmental, and social aspects. It can promote an ecologically sustainable urban environment that brings resilience to biodiversity, ensuring equity in providing ecosystem services to the entire urban population. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the landscape structure around urban protected areas, using geoprocessing technique and Landscape Ecology, supplying subsidy for the proposition of a common ZA to urban protected areas in the municipality of Sorocaba. The average Euclidean distance between the PAs of Sorocaba is 4,782.24 m. The Municipal Natural Park of “Corredores da Biodiversidade” is the most isolated area from other PAs. The “Bráulio Guedes da Silva” Ecological Station is the smallest PA in the municipality (8.9 ha). It is the only one that does not support a forest remnant surrounding the protected limits. The mapped area mainly comprises anthropic land-use, which corresponds to more than 78% of land use. The majority being occupied by urban areas and anthropic fields with pioneer vegetation. The native forest cover is distributed among 706 remnants, with 84.14% having no more than ten (10) hectares. These small remnants are close to each other (NEAR < 50m), thus favoring connectivity achieved through ecological springboards. The anthropic fields of pioneer vegetation identified in the study can serve forest restoration projects, playing an essential role in mitigating forest fragmentation. These lands can improve forest structure and landscape connectivity, promote the connection between PAs and other forest fragments on the landscape. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado por Comitês coordenado pelos Editores Convidados |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/ecoturismo/article/view/12844 10.34024/rbecotur.2021.v14.12844 |
url |
https://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/ecoturismo/article/view/12844 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.34024/rbecotur.2021.v14.12844 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/ecoturismo/article/view/12844/8974 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismo (RBEcotur) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismo (RBEcotur) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismo (RBEcotur); v. 14 n. 5 (2021): Dossiê organizado pelo PPGSGA - UFSCar/Sorocaba Brazilian Journal of Ecotourism; Vol. 14 No. 5 (2021): Dossiê organizado pelo PPGSGA - UFSCar/Sorocaba Revista Brasileña de Ecoturismo; Vol. 14 Núm. 5 (2021): Dossiê organizado pelo PPGSGA - UFSCar/Sorocaba 1983-9391 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismo instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ecoturismo (SBECotur) instacron:SBECOTUR |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ecoturismo (SBECotur) |
instacron_str |
SBECOTUR |
institution |
SBECOTUR |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismo |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismo |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismo - Sociedade Brasileira de Ecoturismo (SBECotur) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||zneiman@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799138612137164800 |