Evaluating buffer zones of Protected Areas in urbanized areas: the case of the municipality of Sorocaba (SP, Brazil)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mello, Kaline de
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Ribeiro, Marina Pannunzio, Valente, Roberta Averna
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismo
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/ecoturismo/article/view/12844
Resumo: The discussion and projects of buffer zones (ZA) surrounding urban protected areas are significant challenges. Design the limits of the ZA must consider technical-scientific criteria, such as land-use/land-cover, river network, environmental, and social aspects. It can promote an ecologically sustainable urban environment that brings resilience to biodiversity, ensuring equity in providing ecosystem services to the entire urban population. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the landscape structure around urban protected areas, using geoprocessing technique and Landscape Ecology, supplying subsidy for the proposition of a common ZA to urban protected areas in the municipality of Sorocaba. The average Euclidean distance between the PAs of Sorocaba is 4,782.24 m. The Municipal Natural Park of “Corredores da Biodiversidade” is the most isolated area from other PAs. The “Bráulio Guedes da Silva” Ecological Station is the smallest PA in the municipality (8.9 ha). It is the only one that does not support a forest remnant surrounding the protected limits. The mapped area mainly comprises anthropic land-use, which corresponds to more than 78% of land use. The majority being occupied by urban areas and anthropic fields with pioneer vegetation. The native forest cover is distributed among 706 remnants, with 84.14% having no more than ten (10) hectares. These small remnants are close to each other (NEAR < 50m), thus favoring connectivity achieved through ecological springboards. The anthropic fields of pioneer vegetation identified in the study can serve forest restoration projects, playing an essential role in mitigating forest fragmentation. These lands can improve forest structure and landscape connectivity, promote the connection between PAs and other forest fragments on the landscape.
id SBECOTUR-1_811644a1de57a1dc1ec09ad64373d2b1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12844
network_acronym_str SBECOTUR-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismo
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluating buffer zones of Protected Areas in urbanized areas: the case of the municipality of Sorocaba (SP, Brazil)Avaliando zonas de amortecimento de Unidades de Conservação em áreas urbanizadas: o caso do município de Sorocaba (SP)Buffer Zoneurban planningurban ecological networkrestorationGISZona de Amortecimentoplanejamento urbanoRedes ecológicas urbanasreflorestamentogeoprocessamentoThe discussion and projects of buffer zones (ZA) surrounding urban protected areas are significant challenges. Design the limits of the ZA must consider technical-scientific criteria, such as land-use/land-cover, river network, environmental, and social aspects. It can promote an ecologically sustainable urban environment that brings resilience to biodiversity, ensuring equity in providing ecosystem services to the entire urban population. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the landscape structure around urban protected areas, using geoprocessing technique and Landscape Ecology, supplying subsidy for the proposition of a common ZA to urban protected areas in the municipality of Sorocaba. The average Euclidean distance between the PAs of Sorocaba is 4,782.24 m. The Municipal Natural Park of “Corredores da Biodiversidade” is the most isolated area from other PAs. The “Bráulio Guedes da Silva” Ecological Station is the smallest PA in the municipality (8.9 ha). It is the only one that does not support a forest remnant surrounding the protected limits. The mapped area mainly comprises anthropic land-use, which corresponds to more than 78% of land use. The majority being occupied by urban areas and anthropic fields with pioneer vegetation. The native forest cover is distributed among 706 remnants, with 84.14% having no more than ten (10) hectares. These small remnants are close to each other (NEAR < 50m), thus favoring connectivity achieved through ecological springboards. The anthropic fields of pioneer vegetation identified in the study can serve forest restoration projects, playing an essential role in mitigating forest fragmentation. These lands can improve forest structure and landscape connectivity, promote the connection between PAs and other forest fragments on the landscape.A discussão e projetos de desenvolvimento de zonas de amortecimento (ZA) no entorno de áreas protegidas urbanas é considerado um grande desafio. A delimitação da ZA deve levar em consideração critérios técnico-científicos, tais como, de uso e ocupação da terra, critérios hidrográficos, critérios ambientais e sociais, para que dessa forma possa se estabelecer um ambiente urbano ecologicamente sustentáveis e que traga resiliência para a biodiversidade, garantindo equidade no provimento de serviços ecossistêmicos para a toda a população urbana. Sendo assim, este estudo objetivou avaliar a estrutura da paisagem nos entornos das áreas protegidas urbanas, utilizando técnicas de geoprocessamento e Ecologia de Paisagem, visando fornecer subsídios à proposição de uma ZA comum às áreas protegidas urbanas do município de Sorocaba. A distância euclidiana média entre as Unidades de Conservação (UCs) de Sorocaba é de 4.782,24 m, e o Parque Natural Municipal de Corredores da Biodiversidade é o mais distante de outras UCs. A Estação Ecológica Bráulio Guedes da Silva, é a menor UC do município (8,9 ha) é a única que não tem o suporte de um remanescente fora dos limites protegidos. A área mapeada é composta majoritariamente pelo uso antrópico da terra, que corresponde a mais de 78% do uso da terra, sendo a maior parte ocupada por áreas urbanas e campos antrópicos de vegetação pioneira. A cobertura florestal nativa, está distribuída entre 706 remanescentes, sendo que 84,14% não possuem mais que dez (10) hectares. Apesar de pequenos, os remanescentes estão próximos entre si (NEAR < 50m), favorecendo dessa forma a conectividade, conquistada através de trampolins ecológicos. Os campos antrópicos de vegetação pioneira apontados na área de estudo podem servir a projetos de restauração florestal, desempenhando um papel importante na mitigação dos impactos da fragmentação florestal, melhorando a estrutura florestal e a conectividade da paisagem, promovendo a conexão entre as áreas protegidas urbanas e outros fragmentos florestais.Universidade Federal de São Paulo2021-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado por Comitês coordenado pelos Editores Convidadosapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/ecoturismo/article/view/1284410.34024/rbecotur.2021.v14.12844Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismo (RBEcotur); v. 14 n. 5 (2021): Dossiê organizado pelo PPGSGA - UFSCar/SorocabaBrazilian Journal of Ecotourism; Vol. 14 No. 5 (2021): Dossiê organizado pelo PPGSGA - UFSCar/SorocabaRevista Brasileña de Ecoturismo; Vol. 14 Núm. 5 (2021): Dossiê organizado pelo PPGSGA - UFSCar/Sorocaba1983-9391reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismoinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ecoturismo (SBECotur)instacron:SBECOTURporhttps://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/ecoturismo/article/view/12844/8974Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismo (RBEcotur)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMello, Kaline deRibeiro, Marina PannunzioValente, Roberta Averna2021-12-01T09:37:07Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12844Revistahttps://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/ecoturismo/indexPUBhttp://www.sbecotur.org.br/rbecotur/seer/index.php/ecoturismo/oai||zneiman@gmail.com1983-93911983-9391opendoar:2021-12-01T09:37:07Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismo - Sociedade Brasileira de Ecoturismo (SBECotur)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluating buffer zones of Protected Areas in urbanized areas: the case of the municipality of Sorocaba (SP, Brazil)
Avaliando zonas de amortecimento de Unidades de Conservação em áreas urbanizadas: o caso do município de Sorocaba (SP)
title Evaluating buffer zones of Protected Areas in urbanized areas: the case of the municipality of Sorocaba (SP, Brazil)
spellingShingle Evaluating buffer zones of Protected Areas in urbanized areas: the case of the municipality of Sorocaba (SP, Brazil)
Mello, Kaline de
Buffer Zone
urban planning
urban ecological network
restoration
GIS
Zona de Amortecimento
planejamento urbano
Redes ecológicas urbanas
reflorestamento
geoprocessamento
title_short Evaluating buffer zones of Protected Areas in urbanized areas: the case of the municipality of Sorocaba (SP, Brazil)
title_full Evaluating buffer zones of Protected Areas in urbanized areas: the case of the municipality of Sorocaba (SP, Brazil)
title_fullStr Evaluating buffer zones of Protected Areas in urbanized areas: the case of the municipality of Sorocaba (SP, Brazil)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating buffer zones of Protected Areas in urbanized areas: the case of the municipality of Sorocaba (SP, Brazil)
title_sort Evaluating buffer zones of Protected Areas in urbanized areas: the case of the municipality of Sorocaba (SP, Brazil)
author Mello, Kaline de
author_facet Mello, Kaline de
Ribeiro, Marina Pannunzio
Valente, Roberta Averna
author_role author
author2 Ribeiro, Marina Pannunzio
Valente, Roberta Averna
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mello, Kaline de
Ribeiro, Marina Pannunzio
Valente, Roberta Averna
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Buffer Zone
urban planning
urban ecological network
restoration
GIS
Zona de Amortecimento
planejamento urbano
Redes ecológicas urbanas
reflorestamento
geoprocessamento
topic Buffer Zone
urban planning
urban ecological network
restoration
GIS
Zona de Amortecimento
planejamento urbano
Redes ecológicas urbanas
reflorestamento
geoprocessamento
description The discussion and projects of buffer zones (ZA) surrounding urban protected areas are significant challenges. Design the limits of the ZA must consider technical-scientific criteria, such as land-use/land-cover, river network, environmental, and social aspects. It can promote an ecologically sustainable urban environment that brings resilience to biodiversity, ensuring equity in providing ecosystem services to the entire urban population. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the landscape structure around urban protected areas, using geoprocessing technique and Landscape Ecology, supplying subsidy for the proposition of a common ZA to urban protected areas in the municipality of Sorocaba. The average Euclidean distance between the PAs of Sorocaba is 4,782.24 m. The Municipal Natural Park of “Corredores da Biodiversidade” is the most isolated area from other PAs. The “Bráulio Guedes da Silva” Ecological Station is the smallest PA in the municipality (8.9 ha). It is the only one that does not support a forest remnant surrounding the protected limits. The mapped area mainly comprises anthropic land-use, which corresponds to more than 78% of land use. The majority being occupied by urban areas and anthropic fields with pioneer vegetation. The native forest cover is distributed among 706 remnants, with 84.14% having no more than ten (10) hectares. These small remnants are close to each other (NEAR < 50m), thus favoring connectivity achieved through ecological springboards. The anthropic fields of pioneer vegetation identified in the study can serve forest restoration projects, playing an essential role in mitigating forest fragmentation. These lands can improve forest structure and landscape connectivity, promote the connection between PAs and other forest fragments on the landscape.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado por Comitês coordenado pelos Editores Convidados
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/ecoturismo/article/view/12844
10.34024/rbecotur.2021.v14.12844
url https://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/ecoturismo/article/view/12844
identifier_str_mv 10.34024/rbecotur.2021.v14.12844
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/ecoturismo/article/view/12844/8974
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismo (RBEcotur)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismo (RBEcotur)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismo (RBEcotur); v. 14 n. 5 (2021): Dossiê organizado pelo PPGSGA - UFSCar/Sorocaba
Brazilian Journal of Ecotourism; Vol. 14 No. 5 (2021): Dossiê organizado pelo PPGSGA - UFSCar/Sorocaba
Revista Brasileña de Ecoturismo; Vol. 14 Núm. 5 (2021): Dossiê organizado pelo PPGSGA - UFSCar/Sorocaba
1983-9391
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismo
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ecoturismo (SBECotur)
instacron:SBECOTUR
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ecoturismo (SBECotur)
instacron_str SBECOTUR
institution SBECOTUR
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismo
collection Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismo
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismo - Sociedade Brasileira de Ecoturismo (SBECotur)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||zneiman@gmail.com
_version_ 1799138612137164800