Images of Dead Poets in Roman Elegiac and Lyric Underworld
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/436 |
Resumo: | In this paper I analyse and compare the representations (or self-representations) of poets in the underworld in elegiac and lyric Roman poetry. I focus especially on five poems: Tibullus I.3; Propertius II. 34; Ovid, Amores II.6 (birds as poets) and III.9; Horace, Odes II.13. It is not my intention to give a detailed interpretation of the whole poems; my principal aim is to analyse how dead poets are pictured in two different genres, the elegiac and the lyric, which share certain features (for instance, we can have in some lyric poems the poetic persona of a lover, the amator, which characterizes erotic elegy discourse, and some similar topics, as the metaphor of love as illness, etc.). At the end of this paper, I will point to the images of dead poets that are (I think) the most representative of the difference between elegiac and lyric genres. In the footnotes I provide some bibliographical references on studies and commentaries about each of the poems I treat here. |
id |
SBEC_7f9a380822285ffbdb92e1c54246b7d6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/436 |
network_acronym_str |
SBEC |
network_name_str |
Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Images of Dead Poets in Roman Elegiac and Lyric UnderworldRoman elegyRoman lyric poetryOvidunderworld.In this paper I analyse and compare the representations (or self-representations) of poets in the underworld in elegiac and lyric Roman poetry. I focus especially on five poems: Tibullus I.3; Propertius II. 34; Ovid, Amores II.6 (birds as poets) and III.9; Horace, Odes II.13. It is not my intention to give a detailed interpretation of the whole poems; my principal aim is to analyse how dead poets are pictured in two different genres, the elegiac and the lyric, which share certain features (for instance, we can have in some lyric poems the poetic persona of a lover, the amator, which characterizes erotic elegy discourse, and some similar topics, as the metaphor of love as illness, etc.). At the end of this paper, I will point to the images of dead poets that are (I think) the most representative of the difference between elegiac and lyric genres. In the footnotes I provide some bibliographical references on studies and commentaries about each of the poems I treat here.Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC)2017-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/43610.24277/classica.v30i2.436Classica; Vol. 30 No. 2 (2017); 47-74Classica - Revista Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos; v. 30 n. 2 (2017); 47-742176-64360103-431610.24277/classica.v30i2reponame:Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC)instacron:SBECenghttps://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/436/600Copyright (c) 2018 Paulo Sérgio de Vasconcellosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVasconcellos, Paulo Sérgio de2018-06-07T02:22:02Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/436Revistahttps://revista.classica.org.br/classicaPUBhttps://revista.classica.org.br/classica/oaieditor@classica.org.br||revistaclassica@classica.org.br2176-64360103-4316opendoar:2018-06-07T02:22:02Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Images of Dead Poets in Roman Elegiac and Lyric Underworld |
title |
Images of Dead Poets in Roman Elegiac and Lyric Underworld |
spellingShingle |
Images of Dead Poets in Roman Elegiac and Lyric Underworld Vasconcellos, Paulo Sérgio de Roman elegy Roman lyric poetry Ovid underworld. |
title_short |
Images of Dead Poets in Roman Elegiac and Lyric Underworld |
title_full |
Images of Dead Poets in Roman Elegiac and Lyric Underworld |
title_fullStr |
Images of Dead Poets in Roman Elegiac and Lyric Underworld |
title_full_unstemmed |
Images of Dead Poets in Roman Elegiac and Lyric Underworld |
title_sort |
Images of Dead Poets in Roman Elegiac and Lyric Underworld |
author |
Vasconcellos, Paulo Sérgio de |
author_facet |
Vasconcellos, Paulo Sérgio de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vasconcellos, Paulo Sérgio de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Roman elegy Roman lyric poetry Ovid underworld. |
topic |
Roman elegy Roman lyric poetry Ovid underworld. |
description |
In this paper I analyse and compare the representations (or self-representations) of poets in the underworld in elegiac and lyric Roman poetry. I focus especially on five poems: Tibullus I.3; Propertius II. 34; Ovid, Amores II.6 (birds as poets) and III.9; Horace, Odes II.13. It is not my intention to give a detailed interpretation of the whole poems; my principal aim is to analyse how dead poets are pictured in two different genres, the elegiac and the lyric, which share certain features (for instance, we can have in some lyric poems the poetic persona of a lover, the amator, which characterizes erotic elegy discourse, and some similar topics, as the metaphor of love as illness, etc.). At the end of this paper, I will point to the images of dead poets that are (I think) the most representative of the difference between elegiac and lyric genres. In the footnotes I provide some bibliographical references on studies and commentaries about each of the poems I treat here. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/436 10.24277/classica.v30i2.436 |
url |
https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/436 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.24277/classica.v30i2.436 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/436/600 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Paulo Sérgio de Vasconcellos info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Paulo Sérgio de Vasconcellos |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Classica; Vol. 30 No. 2 (2017); 47-74 Classica - Revista Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos; v. 30 n. 2 (2017); 47-74 2176-6436 0103-4316 10.24277/classica.v30i2 reponame:Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC) instacron:SBEC |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC) |
instacron_str |
SBEC |
institution |
SBEC |
reponame_str |
Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online) |
collection |
Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Classica (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
editor@classica.org.br||revistaclassica@classica.org.br |
_version_ |
1797239837858725888 |