Immediate effects of joint mobilization compared to sham and control intervention for pain intensity and disability in chronic low back pain patients: randomized controlled clinical trial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tavares,Fernando Augusto Gonçalves
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Chaves,Thais Cristina, Silva,Ednéia Denise, Guerreiro,Gabriela Dionísio, Gonçalves,Joysse Ferreira, Albuquerque,Adriana Aparecida Alves de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Dor
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-00132017000100002
Resumo: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A possibility to treat chronic low back pain is joint mobilization. There is moderate literature evidence of the effects of mobilization on chronic low back pain; however, few studies have used sham mobilization as comparison group. This study aimed at evaluating the effects of back joint mobilization on the following outcomes: pain intensity and incapacity in chronic low back pain patients. METHODS: Participated in the study 60 individuals of both genders with the following eligibility criteria: aged between 18 and 55 years with chronic nonspecific low back pain for at least three months. Selected volunteers were randomly distributed in three groups of 20 individuals: joint mobilization group MG: 39.15±11.45 years, sham mobilization group SG: 37.10±12.57 years, and control group CG: 30.60±8.97. All groups were evaluated by the same blind investigator and have answered to the following tools pre-and immediately after the ten intervention sessions: pain numeric scale to evaluate pain intensity, Oswestry Disability Index to evaluate low back pain-related incapacity and Catastrophic Thoughts Scale to evaluate pain-related catastrophizing. RESULTS: There were significant pre-and post-treatment differences in pain intensity for MG (p<0.001) and SG (p<0.001). There has been significant difference in mean pain intensity value in MG as compared to CG (-2.55). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest sham effect related to the application of mobilization in chronic low back pain patients.
id SBED-1_4b1cd1dc73385cfa20ab6b75d2dcf2c0
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-00132017000100002
network_acronym_str SBED-1
network_name_str Revista Dor
repository_id_str
spelling Immediate effects of joint mobilization compared to sham and control intervention for pain intensity and disability in chronic low back pain patients: randomized controlled clinical trialClinical trialJoint mobilizationLow back painManual therapyPain catastrophizingABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A possibility to treat chronic low back pain is joint mobilization. There is moderate literature evidence of the effects of mobilization on chronic low back pain; however, few studies have used sham mobilization as comparison group. This study aimed at evaluating the effects of back joint mobilization on the following outcomes: pain intensity and incapacity in chronic low back pain patients. METHODS: Participated in the study 60 individuals of both genders with the following eligibility criteria: aged between 18 and 55 years with chronic nonspecific low back pain for at least three months. Selected volunteers were randomly distributed in three groups of 20 individuals: joint mobilization group MG: 39.15±11.45 years, sham mobilization group SG: 37.10±12.57 years, and control group CG: 30.60±8.97. All groups were evaluated by the same blind investigator and have answered to the following tools pre-and immediately after the ten intervention sessions: pain numeric scale to evaluate pain intensity, Oswestry Disability Index to evaluate low back pain-related incapacity and Catastrophic Thoughts Scale to evaluate pain-related catastrophizing. RESULTS: There were significant pre-and post-treatment differences in pain intensity for MG (p<0.001) and SG (p<0.001). There has been significant difference in mean pain intensity value in MG as compared to CG (-2.55). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest sham effect related to the application of mobilization in chronic low back pain patients.Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor2017-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-00132017000100002Revista Dor v.18 n.1 2017reponame:Revista Dorinstname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)instacron:SBED10.5935/1806-0013.20170002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTavares,Fernando Augusto GonçalvesChaves,Thais CristinaSilva,Ednéia DeniseGuerreiro,Gabriela DionísioGonçalves,Joysse FerreiraAlbuquerque,Adriana Aparecida Alves deeng2017-04-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-00132017000100002Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rdor/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpdor@dor.org.br||dor@dor.org.br2317-63931806-0013opendoar:2017-04-10T00:00Revista Dor - Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Immediate effects of joint mobilization compared to sham and control intervention for pain intensity and disability in chronic low back pain patients: randomized controlled clinical trial
title Immediate effects of joint mobilization compared to sham and control intervention for pain intensity and disability in chronic low back pain patients: randomized controlled clinical trial
spellingShingle Immediate effects of joint mobilization compared to sham and control intervention for pain intensity and disability in chronic low back pain patients: randomized controlled clinical trial
Tavares,Fernando Augusto Gonçalves
Clinical trial
Joint mobilization
Low back pain
Manual therapy
Pain catastrophizing
title_short Immediate effects of joint mobilization compared to sham and control intervention for pain intensity and disability in chronic low back pain patients: randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full Immediate effects of joint mobilization compared to sham and control intervention for pain intensity and disability in chronic low back pain patients: randomized controlled clinical trial
title_fullStr Immediate effects of joint mobilization compared to sham and control intervention for pain intensity and disability in chronic low back pain patients: randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Immediate effects of joint mobilization compared to sham and control intervention for pain intensity and disability in chronic low back pain patients: randomized controlled clinical trial
title_sort Immediate effects of joint mobilization compared to sham and control intervention for pain intensity and disability in chronic low back pain patients: randomized controlled clinical trial
author Tavares,Fernando Augusto Gonçalves
author_facet Tavares,Fernando Augusto Gonçalves
Chaves,Thais Cristina
Silva,Ednéia Denise
Guerreiro,Gabriela Dionísio
Gonçalves,Joysse Ferreira
Albuquerque,Adriana Aparecida Alves de
author_role author
author2 Chaves,Thais Cristina
Silva,Ednéia Denise
Guerreiro,Gabriela Dionísio
Gonçalves,Joysse Ferreira
Albuquerque,Adriana Aparecida Alves de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tavares,Fernando Augusto Gonçalves
Chaves,Thais Cristina
Silva,Ednéia Denise
Guerreiro,Gabriela Dionísio
Gonçalves,Joysse Ferreira
Albuquerque,Adriana Aparecida Alves de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Clinical trial
Joint mobilization
Low back pain
Manual therapy
Pain catastrophizing
topic Clinical trial
Joint mobilization
Low back pain
Manual therapy
Pain catastrophizing
description ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A possibility to treat chronic low back pain is joint mobilization. There is moderate literature evidence of the effects of mobilization on chronic low back pain; however, few studies have used sham mobilization as comparison group. This study aimed at evaluating the effects of back joint mobilization on the following outcomes: pain intensity and incapacity in chronic low back pain patients. METHODS: Participated in the study 60 individuals of both genders with the following eligibility criteria: aged between 18 and 55 years with chronic nonspecific low back pain for at least three months. Selected volunteers were randomly distributed in three groups of 20 individuals: joint mobilization group MG: 39.15±11.45 years, sham mobilization group SG: 37.10±12.57 years, and control group CG: 30.60±8.97. All groups were evaluated by the same blind investigator and have answered to the following tools pre-and immediately after the ten intervention sessions: pain numeric scale to evaluate pain intensity, Oswestry Disability Index to evaluate low back pain-related incapacity and Catastrophic Thoughts Scale to evaluate pain-related catastrophizing. RESULTS: There were significant pre-and post-treatment differences in pain intensity for MG (p<0.001) and SG (p<0.001). There has been significant difference in mean pain intensity value in MG as compared to CG (-2.55). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest sham effect related to the application of mobilization in chronic low back pain patients.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-00132017000100002
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-00132017000100002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/1806-0013.20170002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Dor v.18 n.1 2017
reponame:Revista Dor
instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)
instacron:SBED
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)
instacron_str SBED
institution SBED
reponame_str Revista Dor
collection Revista Dor
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Dor - Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dor@dor.org.br||dor@dor.org.br
_version_ 1752126255684124672