Meperidine: opioid not indicated for analgesia

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Botan,Andresa Graciutti
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Lapena,Simone Aparecida Biazzi de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Dor
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-00132015000100067
Resumo: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pain evaluation and the choice of the analgesic best providing its control are extremely important for patients’ quality of life. This study aimed at describing the characteristics which make meperidine unfeasible for pain management, at calling the attention to the incidence of its prescriptions and to the need of a multidisciplinary educative action aiming at decreasing its use, in addition to presenting two opioids as options for analgesia. CONTENTS: National or international scientific and governmental publications between the years 1997 and 2013 used in this study report that meperidine is not indicated for pain management, primarily due to its short action time, presence of neurotoxic metabolite (normeperidine) and possibility of rapidly developing tolerance. CONCLUSION: According to analyzed data, meperidine was the most widely used opioid for analgesic or was among the most prescribed analgesics. This fact shows the real need for an educative multidisciplinary action to promote awareness of meperidine risks and to decrease its prescription. According to searched literature, morphine and methadone have longer action time and higher analgesic potency, with metabolites which are less toxic and noxious for patients as compared to meperidine.
id SBED-1_ea30240c0cc8145c8a91b200bae639b1
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-00132015000100067
network_acronym_str SBED-1
network_name_str Revista Dor
repository_id_str
spelling Meperidine: opioid not indicated for analgesiaAnalgesiaMeperidineMethadoneMorphinePain BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pain evaluation and the choice of the analgesic best providing its control are extremely important for patients’ quality of life. This study aimed at describing the characteristics which make meperidine unfeasible for pain management, at calling the attention to the incidence of its prescriptions and to the need of a multidisciplinary educative action aiming at decreasing its use, in addition to presenting two opioids as options for analgesia. CONTENTS: National or international scientific and governmental publications between the years 1997 and 2013 used in this study report that meperidine is not indicated for pain management, primarily due to its short action time, presence of neurotoxic metabolite (normeperidine) and possibility of rapidly developing tolerance. CONCLUSION: According to analyzed data, meperidine was the most widely used opioid for analgesic or was among the most prescribed analgesics. This fact shows the real need for an educative multidisciplinary action to promote awareness of meperidine risks and to decrease its prescription. According to searched literature, morphine and methadone have longer action time and higher analgesic potency, with metabolites which are less toxic and noxious for patients as compared to meperidine. Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor2015-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-00132015000100067Revista Dor v.16 n.1 2015reponame:Revista Dorinstname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)instacron:SBED10.5935/1806-0013.20150013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBotan,Andresa GraciuttiLapena,Simone Aparecida Biazzi deeng2015-08-04T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-00132015000100067Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rdor/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpdor@dor.org.br||dor@dor.org.br2317-63931806-0013opendoar:2015-08-04T00:00Revista Dor - Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Meperidine: opioid not indicated for analgesia
title Meperidine: opioid not indicated for analgesia
spellingShingle Meperidine: opioid not indicated for analgesia
Botan,Andresa Graciutti
Analgesia
Meperidine
Methadone
Morphine
Pain
title_short Meperidine: opioid not indicated for analgesia
title_full Meperidine: opioid not indicated for analgesia
title_fullStr Meperidine: opioid not indicated for analgesia
title_full_unstemmed Meperidine: opioid not indicated for analgesia
title_sort Meperidine: opioid not indicated for analgesia
author Botan,Andresa Graciutti
author_facet Botan,Andresa Graciutti
Lapena,Simone Aparecida Biazzi de
author_role author
author2 Lapena,Simone Aparecida Biazzi de
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Botan,Andresa Graciutti
Lapena,Simone Aparecida Biazzi de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Analgesia
Meperidine
Methadone
Morphine
Pain
topic Analgesia
Meperidine
Methadone
Morphine
Pain
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pain evaluation and the choice of the analgesic best providing its control are extremely important for patients’ quality of life. This study aimed at describing the characteristics which make meperidine unfeasible for pain management, at calling the attention to the incidence of its prescriptions and to the need of a multidisciplinary educative action aiming at decreasing its use, in addition to presenting two opioids as options for analgesia. CONTENTS: National or international scientific and governmental publications between the years 1997 and 2013 used in this study report that meperidine is not indicated for pain management, primarily due to its short action time, presence of neurotoxic metabolite (normeperidine) and possibility of rapidly developing tolerance. CONCLUSION: According to analyzed data, meperidine was the most widely used opioid for analgesic or was among the most prescribed analgesics. This fact shows the real need for an educative multidisciplinary action to promote awareness of meperidine risks and to decrease its prescription. According to searched literature, morphine and methadone have longer action time and higher analgesic potency, with metabolites which are less toxic and noxious for patients as compared to meperidine.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-00132015000100067
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-00132015000100067
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/1806-0013.20150013
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Dor v.16 n.1 2015
reponame:Revista Dor
instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)
instacron:SBED
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)
instacron_str SBED
institution SBED
reponame_str Revista Dor
collection Revista Dor
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Dor - Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dor@dor.org.br||dor@dor.org.br
_version_ 1752126254977384448