Conservative versus surgical treatment in patients with lumbar disc herniation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | BrJP (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2595-31922021000400357 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Herniated disc is a common pathology, affecting about 5 to 10 cases per 1000 adults annually. A conservative or a surgical approach to treatment can be adopted. The present study’s objective was to evaluate each of these approaches. CONTENTS: An integrative literature review was carried out, aiming to understand which treatment provides greater benefits in the short, medium, and long term for patients with low back disc herniation. Of the 4941 articles found, 4852 were excluded by title, 75 by abstract and 14 were selected for the study. Of these 14 studies, 10 considered the conservative approach more beneficial to patients, while 4 considered the surgical conduct more beneficial. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment is a good option for those cases in which patients have debilitating pain and need rapid pain relief. However, in the long run, there is no superiority of surgery over conservative treatment. |
id |
SBED-2_679636e21af914bfbb0bae8ff29b3461 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2595-31922021000400357 |
network_acronym_str |
SBED-2 |
network_name_str |
BrJP (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Conservative versus surgical treatment in patients with lumbar disc herniationIntervertebral disc displacementLow back painSurgical proceduresABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Herniated disc is a common pathology, affecting about 5 to 10 cases per 1000 adults annually. A conservative or a surgical approach to treatment can be adopted. The present study’s objective was to evaluate each of these approaches. CONTENTS: An integrative literature review was carried out, aiming to understand which treatment provides greater benefits in the short, medium, and long term for patients with low back disc herniation. Of the 4941 articles found, 4852 were excluded by title, 75 by abstract and 14 were selected for the study. Of these 14 studies, 10 considered the conservative approach more beneficial to patients, while 4 considered the surgical conduct more beneficial. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment is a good option for those cases in which patients have debilitating pain and need rapid pain relief. However, in the long run, there is no superiority of surgery over conservative treatment.Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor2021-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2595-31922021000400357BrJP v.4 n.4 2021reponame:BrJP (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)instacron:SBED10.5935/2595-0118.20210067info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlves Filho,Arnon CastroGonçalves,Allana Laís FurtadoBarbosa,Amanda de Meloeng2021-12-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2595-31922021000400357Revistahttps://sbed.org.br/publicacoes-publicacoes-bjp/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpdkt@terra.com.br || dor@dor.org.br2595-31922595-0118opendoar:2021-12-15T00:00BrJP (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Conservative versus surgical treatment in patients with lumbar disc herniation |
title |
Conservative versus surgical treatment in patients with lumbar disc herniation |
spellingShingle |
Conservative versus surgical treatment in patients with lumbar disc herniation Alves Filho,Arnon Castro Intervertebral disc displacement Low back pain Surgical procedures |
title_short |
Conservative versus surgical treatment in patients with lumbar disc herniation |
title_full |
Conservative versus surgical treatment in patients with lumbar disc herniation |
title_fullStr |
Conservative versus surgical treatment in patients with lumbar disc herniation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Conservative versus surgical treatment in patients with lumbar disc herniation |
title_sort |
Conservative versus surgical treatment in patients with lumbar disc herniation |
author |
Alves Filho,Arnon Castro |
author_facet |
Alves Filho,Arnon Castro Gonçalves,Allana Laís Furtado Barbosa,Amanda de Melo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gonçalves,Allana Laís Furtado Barbosa,Amanda de Melo |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Alves Filho,Arnon Castro Gonçalves,Allana Laís Furtado Barbosa,Amanda de Melo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Intervertebral disc displacement Low back pain Surgical procedures |
topic |
Intervertebral disc displacement Low back pain Surgical procedures |
description |
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Herniated disc is a common pathology, affecting about 5 to 10 cases per 1000 adults annually. A conservative or a surgical approach to treatment can be adopted. The present study’s objective was to evaluate each of these approaches. CONTENTS: An integrative literature review was carried out, aiming to understand which treatment provides greater benefits in the short, medium, and long term for patients with low back disc herniation. Of the 4941 articles found, 4852 were excluded by title, 75 by abstract and 14 were selected for the study. Of these 14 studies, 10 considered the conservative approach more beneficial to patients, while 4 considered the surgical conduct more beneficial. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment is a good option for those cases in which patients have debilitating pain and need rapid pain relief. However, in the long run, there is no superiority of surgery over conservative treatment. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2595-31922021000400357 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2595-31922021000400357 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5935/2595-0118.20210067 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
BrJP v.4 n.4 2021 reponame:BrJP (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED) instacron:SBED |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED) |
instacron_str |
SBED |
institution |
SBED |
reponame_str |
BrJP (Online) |
collection |
BrJP (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
BrJP (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dkt@terra.com.br || dor@dor.org.br |
_version_ |
1754732510466539520 |