Does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain free of adverse effects during pregnancy? Systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mendonça,Andreza Carvalho Rabelo
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Souto,Natália Barreto Rocha, Lima,Lucas Vasconcelos, Azevedo-Santos,Isabela Freire, Rett,Mariana Tirolli, DeSantana,Josimari Melo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: BrJP (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2595-31922020000400374
Resumo: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is considered a current that should not be applied in pregnant women to avoid adverse effects. This systematic review aimed to analyze the scientific evidence about the use of TENS during pregnancy. CONTENTS: This study was conducted on November 2019 by searching the electronic databases: Pubmed, Scielo, LILACS, Science Direct, Cochrane Library and PEDro. The following descriptors were used: "transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation" combined with "pregnancy". Only randomized clinical trials that investigated the use of TENS during pregnancy were selected. Methodological quality was assessed by using the Cochrane Collaboration Tool (RevMan 5.3 software). Studies were classified according to the risk of bias (low, high or unclear). From 691 eligible publications, only two randomized clinical trials were selected according to inclusion criteria. Low risk of bias was detected in most items in one study and high risk for performance, detection and reporting bias were evidenced in the other study. Other bias (TENS intensity control by patient) was considered unclear in both studies. CONCLUSION: There is not enough support that TENS neither reduces pain intensity nor causes adverse effects in pregnant patients.
id SBED-2_746422112593063fd812c704c500203a
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2595-31922020000400374
network_acronym_str SBED-2
network_name_str BrJP (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain free of adverse effects during pregnancy? Systematic reviewAnalgesiaPregnancyPregnantTranscutaneous electric nerve stimulationABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is considered a current that should not be applied in pregnant women to avoid adverse effects. This systematic review aimed to analyze the scientific evidence about the use of TENS during pregnancy. CONTENTS: This study was conducted on November 2019 by searching the electronic databases: Pubmed, Scielo, LILACS, Science Direct, Cochrane Library and PEDro. The following descriptors were used: "transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation" combined with "pregnancy". Only randomized clinical trials that investigated the use of TENS during pregnancy were selected. Methodological quality was assessed by using the Cochrane Collaboration Tool (RevMan 5.3 software). Studies were classified according to the risk of bias (low, high or unclear). From 691 eligible publications, only two randomized clinical trials were selected according to inclusion criteria. Low risk of bias was detected in most items in one study and high risk for performance, detection and reporting bias were evidenced in the other study. Other bias (TENS intensity control by patient) was considered unclear in both studies. CONCLUSION: There is not enough support that TENS neither reduces pain intensity nor causes adverse effects in pregnant patients.Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor2020-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2595-31922020000400374BrJP v.3 n.4 2020reponame:BrJP (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)instacron:SBED10.5935/2595-0118.20200200info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMendonça,Andreza Carvalho RabeloSouto,Natália Barreto RochaLima,Lucas VasconcelosAzevedo-Santos,Isabela FreireRett,Mariana TirolliDeSantana,Josimari Meloeng2021-01-05T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2595-31922020000400374Revistahttps://sbed.org.br/publicacoes-publicacoes-bjp/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpdkt@terra.com.br || dor@dor.org.br2595-31922595-0118opendoar:2021-01-05T00:00BrJP (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain free of adverse effects during pregnancy? Systematic review
title Does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain free of adverse effects during pregnancy? Systematic review
spellingShingle Does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain free of adverse effects during pregnancy? Systematic review
Mendonça,Andreza Carvalho Rabelo
Analgesia
Pregnancy
Pregnant
Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation
title_short Does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain free of adverse effects during pregnancy? Systematic review
title_full Does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain free of adverse effects during pregnancy? Systematic review
title_fullStr Does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain free of adverse effects during pregnancy? Systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain free of adverse effects during pregnancy? Systematic review
title_sort Does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain free of adverse effects during pregnancy? Systematic review
author Mendonça,Andreza Carvalho Rabelo
author_facet Mendonça,Andreza Carvalho Rabelo
Souto,Natália Barreto Rocha
Lima,Lucas Vasconcelos
Azevedo-Santos,Isabela Freire
Rett,Mariana Tirolli
DeSantana,Josimari Melo
author_role author
author2 Souto,Natália Barreto Rocha
Lima,Lucas Vasconcelos
Azevedo-Santos,Isabela Freire
Rett,Mariana Tirolli
DeSantana,Josimari Melo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mendonça,Andreza Carvalho Rabelo
Souto,Natália Barreto Rocha
Lima,Lucas Vasconcelos
Azevedo-Santos,Isabela Freire
Rett,Mariana Tirolli
DeSantana,Josimari Melo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Analgesia
Pregnancy
Pregnant
Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation
topic Analgesia
Pregnancy
Pregnant
Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation
description ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is considered a current that should not be applied in pregnant women to avoid adverse effects. This systematic review aimed to analyze the scientific evidence about the use of TENS during pregnancy. CONTENTS: This study was conducted on November 2019 by searching the electronic databases: Pubmed, Scielo, LILACS, Science Direct, Cochrane Library and PEDro. The following descriptors were used: "transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation" combined with "pregnancy". Only randomized clinical trials that investigated the use of TENS during pregnancy were selected. Methodological quality was assessed by using the Cochrane Collaboration Tool (RevMan 5.3 software). Studies were classified according to the risk of bias (low, high or unclear). From 691 eligible publications, only two randomized clinical trials were selected according to inclusion criteria. Low risk of bias was detected in most items in one study and high risk for performance, detection and reporting bias were evidenced in the other study. Other bias (TENS intensity control by patient) was considered unclear in both studies. CONCLUSION: There is not enough support that TENS neither reduces pain intensity nor causes adverse effects in pregnant patients.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2595-31922020000400374
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2595-31922020000400374
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/2595-0118.20200200
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv BrJP v.3 n.4 2020
reponame:BrJP (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)
instacron:SBED
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)
instacron_str SBED
institution SBED
reponame_str BrJP (Online)
collection BrJP (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv BrJP (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dkt@terra.com.br || dor@dor.org.br
_version_ 1754732510027186176