Does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain free of adverse effects during pregnancy? Systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | BrJP (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2595-31922020000400374 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is considered a current that should not be applied in pregnant women to avoid adverse effects. This systematic review aimed to analyze the scientific evidence about the use of TENS during pregnancy. CONTENTS: This study was conducted on November 2019 by searching the electronic databases: Pubmed, Scielo, LILACS, Science Direct, Cochrane Library and PEDro. The following descriptors were used: "transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation" combined with "pregnancy". Only randomized clinical trials that investigated the use of TENS during pregnancy were selected. Methodological quality was assessed by using the Cochrane Collaboration Tool (RevMan 5.3 software). Studies were classified according to the risk of bias (low, high or unclear). From 691 eligible publications, only two randomized clinical trials were selected according to inclusion criteria. Low risk of bias was detected in most items in one study and high risk for performance, detection and reporting bias were evidenced in the other study. Other bias (TENS intensity control by patient) was considered unclear in both studies. CONCLUSION: There is not enough support that TENS neither reduces pain intensity nor causes adverse effects in pregnant patients. |
id |
SBED-2_746422112593063fd812c704c500203a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2595-31922020000400374 |
network_acronym_str |
SBED-2 |
network_name_str |
BrJP (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain free of adverse effects during pregnancy? Systematic reviewAnalgesiaPregnancyPregnantTranscutaneous electric nerve stimulationABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is considered a current that should not be applied in pregnant women to avoid adverse effects. This systematic review aimed to analyze the scientific evidence about the use of TENS during pregnancy. CONTENTS: This study was conducted on November 2019 by searching the electronic databases: Pubmed, Scielo, LILACS, Science Direct, Cochrane Library and PEDro. The following descriptors were used: "transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation" combined with "pregnancy". Only randomized clinical trials that investigated the use of TENS during pregnancy were selected. Methodological quality was assessed by using the Cochrane Collaboration Tool (RevMan 5.3 software). Studies were classified according to the risk of bias (low, high or unclear). From 691 eligible publications, only two randomized clinical trials were selected according to inclusion criteria. Low risk of bias was detected in most items in one study and high risk for performance, detection and reporting bias were evidenced in the other study. Other bias (TENS intensity control by patient) was considered unclear in both studies. CONCLUSION: There is not enough support that TENS neither reduces pain intensity nor causes adverse effects in pregnant patients.Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor2020-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2595-31922020000400374BrJP v.3 n.4 2020reponame:BrJP (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)instacron:SBED10.5935/2595-0118.20200200info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMendonça,Andreza Carvalho RabeloSouto,Natália Barreto RochaLima,Lucas VasconcelosAzevedo-Santos,Isabela FreireRett,Mariana TirolliDeSantana,Josimari Meloeng2021-01-05T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2595-31922020000400374Revistahttps://sbed.org.br/publicacoes-publicacoes-bjp/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpdkt@terra.com.br || dor@dor.org.br2595-31922595-0118opendoar:2021-01-05T00:00BrJP (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain free of adverse effects during pregnancy? Systematic review |
title |
Does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain free of adverse effects during pregnancy? Systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain free of adverse effects during pregnancy? Systematic review Mendonça,Andreza Carvalho Rabelo Analgesia Pregnancy Pregnant Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation |
title_short |
Does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain free of adverse effects during pregnancy? Systematic review |
title_full |
Does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain free of adverse effects during pregnancy? Systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain free of adverse effects during pregnancy? Systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain free of adverse effects during pregnancy? Systematic review |
title_sort |
Does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain free of adverse effects during pregnancy? Systematic review |
author |
Mendonça,Andreza Carvalho Rabelo |
author_facet |
Mendonça,Andreza Carvalho Rabelo Souto,Natália Barreto Rocha Lima,Lucas Vasconcelos Azevedo-Santos,Isabela Freire Rett,Mariana Tirolli DeSantana,Josimari Melo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Souto,Natália Barreto Rocha Lima,Lucas Vasconcelos Azevedo-Santos,Isabela Freire Rett,Mariana Tirolli DeSantana,Josimari Melo |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mendonça,Andreza Carvalho Rabelo Souto,Natália Barreto Rocha Lima,Lucas Vasconcelos Azevedo-Santos,Isabela Freire Rett,Mariana Tirolli DeSantana,Josimari Melo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Analgesia Pregnancy Pregnant Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation |
topic |
Analgesia Pregnancy Pregnant Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation |
description |
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is considered a current that should not be applied in pregnant women to avoid adverse effects. This systematic review aimed to analyze the scientific evidence about the use of TENS during pregnancy. CONTENTS: This study was conducted on November 2019 by searching the electronic databases: Pubmed, Scielo, LILACS, Science Direct, Cochrane Library and PEDro. The following descriptors were used: "transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation" combined with "pregnancy". Only randomized clinical trials that investigated the use of TENS during pregnancy were selected. Methodological quality was assessed by using the Cochrane Collaboration Tool (RevMan 5.3 software). Studies were classified according to the risk of bias (low, high or unclear). From 691 eligible publications, only two randomized clinical trials were selected according to inclusion criteria. Low risk of bias was detected in most items in one study and high risk for performance, detection and reporting bias were evidenced in the other study. Other bias (TENS intensity control by patient) was considered unclear in both studies. CONCLUSION: There is not enough support that TENS neither reduces pain intensity nor causes adverse effects in pregnant patients. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2595-31922020000400374 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2595-31922020000400374 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5935/2595-0118.20200200 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
BrJP v.3 n.4 2020 reponame:BrJP (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED) instacron:SBED |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED) |
instacron_str |
SBED |
institution |
SBED |
reponame_str |
BrJP (Online) |
collection |
BrJP (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
BrJP (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dkt@terra.com.br || dor@dor.org.br |
_version_ |
1754732510027186176 |