Cortical plasticity following intramuscular lidocaine injection

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Valente,Julie Azevedo Araújo
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Camatti,Janine Ribeiro, Ramalho,Maria José, Oliveira,Iasmyn Adélia Victor Fernandes de, Hazime,Fuad Ahmad, Baptista,Abrahão Fontes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: BrJP (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2595-31922021000200119
Resumo: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The manipulation of peripheral neuronal activity can alter the excitability of the primary motor cortex; however, it is not known whether this occurs after intramuscular injections of lidocaine. Therefore, the investigation focused on neurophysiological changes, assessed with transcranial magnetic stimulation, after lidocaine (0.5mL, 2%) injection in the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the dominant hand of healthy individuals. METHODS: Exploratory, double-blind, parallel laboratory study. Twenty-eight healthy subjects (mean age: 29.6 years, 15 women). Measurements with transcranial magnetic stimulation included resting motor threshold, motor evoked potential, intracortical facilitation, and short intracortical inhibition. Lidocaine injection (LID group) was compared to dry needling (DRY group), saline injection (SAL group), and no intervention (CTL group). Participants were randomly placed in each group. Muscle strength and measures of peripheral excitability (rheobase and chronaxie) were also evaluated to detect whether the interventions generated changes in the peripheral neuromuscular excitability. Evaluations were performed over four time points: immediately before and after intervention and 30 and 60 minutes after intervention. RESULTS: A generalized linear model was used to identify differences between the LID, DRY, and SAL groups and the CTL group. The results showed that motor evoked potentials were modified in the LID group (p<0.005). CONCLUSION: The injection of lidocaine into the first dorsal interosseous muscle in the dominant hand of healthy adults alters motor evoked potentials.
id SBED-2_79b415540f3a0adfb41ce83926c87974
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2595-31922021000200119
network_acronym_str SBED-2
network_name_str BrJP (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Cortical plasticity following intramuscular lidocaine injectionAnesthesiaLocal anesthesiaPainTranscranial magnetic stimulation.ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The manipulation of peripheral neuronal activity can alter the excitability of the primary motor cortex; however, it is not known whether this occurs after intramuscular injections of lidocaine. Therefore, the investigation focused on neurophysiological changes, assessed with transcranial magnetic stimulation, after lidocaine (0.5mL, 2%) injection in the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the dominant hand of healthy individuals. METHODS: Exploratory, double-blind, parallel laboratory study. Twenty-eight healthy subjects (mean age: 29.6 years, 15 women). Measurements with transcranial magnetic stimulation included resting motor threshold, motor evoked potential, intracortical facilitation, and short intracortical inhibition. Lidocaine injection (LID group) was compared to dry needling (DRY group), saline injection (SAL group), and no intervention (CTL group). Participants were randomly placed in each group. Muscle strength and measures of peripheral excitability (rheobase and chronaxie) were also evaluated to detect whether the interventions generated changes in the peripheral neuromuscular excitability. Evaluations were performed over four time points: immediately before and after intervention and 30 and 60 minutes after intervention. RESULTS: A generalized linear model was used to identify differences between the LID, DRY, and SAL groups and the CTL group. The results showed that motor evoked potentials were modified in the LID group (p<0.005). CONCLUSION: The injection of lidocaine into the first dorsal interosseous muscle in the dominant hand of healthy adults alters motor evoked potentials.Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor2021-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2595-31922021000200119BrJP v.4 n.2 2021reponame:BrJP (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)instacron:SBED10.5935/2595-0118.20210030info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessValente,Julie Azevedo AraújoCamatti,Janine RibeiroRamalho,Maria JoséOliveira,Iasmyn Adélia Victor Fernandes deHazime,Fuad AhmadBaptista,Abrahão Fonteseng2021-07-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2595-31922021000200119Revistahttps://sbed.org.br/publicacoes-publicacoes-bjp/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpdkt@terra.com.br || dor@dor.org.br2595-31922595-0118opendoar:2021-07-21T00:00BrJP (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cortical plasticity following intramuscular lidocaine injection
title Cortical plasticity following intramuscular lidocaine injection
spellingShingle Cortical plasticity following intramuscular lidocaine injection
Valente,Julie Azevedo Araújo
Anesthesia
Local anesthesia
Pain
Transcranial magnetic stimulation.
title_short Cortical plasticity following intramuscular lidocaine injection
title_full Cortical plasticity following intramuscular lidocaine injection
title_fullStr Cortical plasticity following intramuscular lidocaine injection
title_full_unstemmed Cortical plasticity following intramuscular lidocaine injection
title_sort Cortical plasticity following intramuscular lidocaine injection
author Valente,Julie Azevedo Araújo
author_facet Valente,Julie Azevedo Araújo
Camatti,Janine Ribeiro
Ramalho,Maria José
Oliveira,Iasmyn Adélia Victor Fernandes de
Hazime,Fuad Ahmad
Baptista,Abrahão Fontes
author_role author
author2 Camatti,Janine Ribeiro
Ramalho,Maria José
Oliveira,Iasmyn Adélia Victor Fernandes de
Hazime,Fuad Ahmad
Baptista,Abrahão Fontes
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Valente,Julie Azevedo Araújo
Camatti,Janine Ribeiro
Ramalho,Maria José
Oliveira,Iasmyn Adélia Victor Fernandes de
Hazime,Fuad Ahmad
Baptista,Abrahão Fontes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Anesthesia
Local anesthesia
Pain
Transcranial magnetic stimulation.
topic Anesthesia
Local anesthesia
Pain
Transcranial magnetic stimulation.
description ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The manipulation of peripheral neuronal activity can alter the excitability of the primary motor cortex; however, it is not known whether this occurs after intramuscular injections of lidocaine. Therefore, the investigation focused on neurophysiological changes, assessed with transcranial magnetic stimulation, after lidocaine (0.5mL, 2%) injection in the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the dominant hand of healthy individuals. METHODS: Exploratory, double-blind, parallel laboratory study. Twenty-eight healthy subjects (mean age: 29.6 years, 15 women). Measurements with transcranial magnetic stimulation included resting motor threshold, motor evoked potential, intracortical facilitation, and short intracortical inhibition. Lidocaine injection (LID group) was compared to dry needling (DRY group), saline injection (SAL group), and no intervention (CTL group). Participants were randomly placed in each group. Muscle strength and measures of peripheral excitability (rheobase and chronaxie) were also evaluated to detect whether the interventions generated changes in the peripheral neuromuscular excitability. Evaluations were performed over four time points: immediately before and after intervention and 30 and 60 minutes after intervention. RESULTS: A generalized linear model was used to identify differences between the LID, DRY, and SAL groups and the CTL group. The results showed that motor evoked potentials were modified in the LID group (p<0.005). CONCLUSION: The injection of lidocaine into the first dorsal interosseous muscle in the dominant hand of healthy adults alters motor evoked potentials.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2595-31922021000200119
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2595-31922021000200119
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/2595-0118.20210030
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv BrJP v.4 n.2 2021
reponame:BrJP (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)
instacron:SBED
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)
instacron_str SBED
institution SBED
reponame_str BrJP (Online)
collection BrJP (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv BrJP (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dkt@terra.com.br || dor@dor.org.br
_version_ 1754732510774820864