Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and hypnosis on chronic low back pain

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Weizemann,Carolina
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Camargo,Nathielly Flores, Barboza,Taise Vieira, Carvalho,Alberito Rodrigo de, Bertolini,Gladson Ricardo Flor
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: BrJP (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2595-31922021000100026
Resumo: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Among the main non-pharmacological analgesic techniques are physical therapies such as electrotherapy and cognitive-behavioral techniques, such as hypnosis. The objective of this study was to compare the analgesic effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and hypnosis in the control of chronic low back pain. METHODS A crossover study that included 19 young adults of both genders with chronic low back pain who underwent TENS and hypnosis, and pain education as a control group. The quality of pain was assessed by the McGill’s questionnaire; pain intensity and threshold were assessed by the visual analog scale. The intensity of spontaneous pain, the threshold and intensity of pain induced by cold and the pressure pain threshold before the interventions, immediately after the interventions and 30 minutes after the end of the interventions were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed with Generalized Mixed Linear Models, with 5% significance, and Cohen’s G effect sizes. RESULTS There was a statistically significant decrease in the intensity of spontaneous and cold induced pain in the hypnosis and TENS groups compared to the pain education group. There was a statistically significant reduction of pain in the sensory and evaluation categories in the intervention groups compared to the control group. There was no significant difference for the pressure pain threshold and latency time for cold induced pain. CONCLUSION Hypnosis and TENS decreased the intensity of chronic low back pain with no statistically significant difference between them, but statistically different from the pain education control group.
id SBED-2_7ce84422fb7833a1fc86061e6b4f7e14
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2595-31922021000100026
network_acronym_str SBED-2
network_name_str BrJP (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and hypnosis on chronic low back painHypnosisLow back painPhysical therapy modalitiesTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulationABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Among the main non-pharmacological analgesic techniques are physical therapies such as electrotherapy and cognitive-behavioral techniques, such as hypnosis. The objective of this study was to compare the analgesic effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and hypnosis in the control of chronic low back pain. METHODS A crossover study that included 19 young adults of both genders with chronic low back pain who underwent TENS and hypnosis, and pain education as a control group. The quality of pain was assessed by the McGill’s questionnaire; pain intensity and threshold were assessed by the visual analog scale. The intensity of spontaneous pain, the threshold and intensity of pain induced by cold and the pressure pain threshold before the interventions, immediately after the interventions and 30 minutes after the end of the interventions were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed with Generalized Mixed Linear Models, with 5% significance, and Cohen’s G effect sizes. RESULTS There was a statistically significant decrease in the intensity of spontaneous and cold induced pain in the hypnosis and TENS groups compared to the pain education group. There was a statistically significant reduction of pain in the sensory and evaluation categories in the intervention groups compared to the control group. There was no significant difference for the pressure pain threshold and latency time for cold induced pain. CONCLUSION Hypnosis and TENS decreased the intensity of chronic low back pain with no statistically significant difference between them, but statistically different from the pain education control group.Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2595-31922021000100026BrJP v.4 n.1 2021reponame:BrJP (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)instacron:SBED10.5935/2595-0118.20210005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWeizemann,CarolinaCamargo,Nathielly FloresBarboza,Taise VieiraCarvalho,Alberito Rodrigo deBertolini,Gladson Ricardo Floreng2021-04-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2595-31922021000100026Revistahttps://sbed.org.br/publicacoes-publicacoes-bjp/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpdkt@terra.com.br || dor@dor.org.br2595-31922595-0118opendoar:2021-04-20T00:00BrJP (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and hypnosis on chronic low back pain
title Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and hypnosis on chronic low back pain
spellingShingle Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and hypnosis on chronic low back pain
Weizemann,Carolina
Hypnosis
Low back pain
Physical therapy modalities
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
title_short Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and hypnosis on chronic low back pain
title_full Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and hypnosis on chronic low back pain
title_fullStr Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and hypnosis on chronic low back pain
title_full_unstemmed Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and hypnosis on chronic low back pain
title_sort Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and hypnosis on chronic low back pain
author Weizemann,Carolina
author_facet Weizemann,Carolina
Camargo,Nathielly Flores
Barboza,Taise Vieira
Carvalho,Alberito Rodrigo de
Bertolini,Gladson Ricardo Flor
author_role author
author2 Camargo,Nathielly Flores
Barboza,Taise Vieira
Carvalho,Alberito Rodrigo de
Bertolini,Gladson Ricardo Flor
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Weizemann,Carolina
Camargo,Nathielly Flores
Barboza,Taise Vieira
Carvalho,Alberito Rodrigo de
Bertolini,Gladson Ricardo Flor
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hypnosis
Low back pain
Physical therapy modalities
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
topic Hypnosis
Low back pain
Physical therapy modalities
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
description ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Among the main non-pharmacological analgesic techniques are physical therapies such as electrotherapy and cognitive-behavioral techniques, such as hypnosis. The objective of this study was to compare the analgesic effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and hypnosis in the control of chronic low back pain. METHODS A crossover study that included 19 young adults of both genders with chronic low back pain who underwent TENS and hypnosis, and pain education as a control group. The quality of pain was assessed by the McGill’s questionnaire; pain intensity and threshold were assessed by the visual analog scale. The intensity of spontaneous pain, the threshold and intensity of pain induced by cold and the pressure pain threshold before the interventions, immediately after the interventions and 30 minutes after the end of the interventions were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed with Generalized Mixed Linear Models, with 5% significance, and Cohen’s G effect sizes. RESULTS There was a statistically significant decrease in the intensity of spontaneous and cold induced pain in the hypnosis and TENS groups compared to the pain education group. There was a statistically significant reduction of pain in the sensory and evaluation categories in the intervention groups compared to the control group. There was no significant difference for the pressure pain threshold and latency time for cold induced pain. CONCLUSION Hypnosis and TENS decreased the intensity of chronic low back pain with no statistically significant difference between them, but statistically different from the pain education control group.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2595-31922021000100026
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2595-31922021000100026
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/2595-0118.20210005
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv BrJP v.4 n.1 2021
reponame:BrJP (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)
instacron:SBED
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)
instacron_str SBED
institution SBED
reponame_str BrJP (Online)
collection BrJP (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv BrJP (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dkt@terra.com.br || dor@dor.org.br
_version_ 1754732510733926400