Beef acceptance index proposition

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lucchese-Cheung,Thelma
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Spers,Eduardo Eugênio, Pereira,Matheus Wemersom Gomes, Dias,Priscila Caroline Souza Paiva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-20032021000200211
Resumo: Summary: Beliefs, social rules, and food taboos influence the emotions we feel about food, determining our attitudes and consumption behaviors. The more a product represents values considered important to individuals, the greater the chance of being chosen for consumption. This article aimed to investigate levels of zoophagy and sarcophagy to propose an index to understand consumers' attitudes towards beef. Three hundred and eighty-five people answered a structured questionnaire that allowed them to assess personality traits and attitudes that can explain beef consumption, as well as its rejection. Factor analysis was the analytical model chosen to construct the attitude determination index. For the construction of the General Degradation Index (GDI), an attitude determination index associated with the degree of zoophagy was built first. The results indicate that extroversion, individualism, festivity, and immediacy were the traits that best characterized positive attitudes towards beef. On the other hand, negative attitudes of introspection, reflection, emotional character, and concern for the future marked the responses of those who answered.
id SBESR-1_14768ee7576a9529e477add933ea628b
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-20032021000200211
network_acronym_str SBESR-1
network_name_str Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural
repository_id_str
spelling Beef acceptance index propositionbeefconsumptionzoophagysarcophagimarket segmentationSummary: Beliefs, social rules, and food taboos influence the emotions we feel about food, determining our attitudes and consumption behaviors. The more a product represents values considered important to individuals, the greater the chance of being chosen for consumption. This article aimed to investigate levels of zoophagy and sarcophagy to propose an index to understand consumers' attitudes towards beef. Three hundred and eighty-five people answered a structured questionnaire that allowed them to assess personality traits and attitudes that can explain beef consumption, as well as its rejection. Factor analysis was the analytical model chosen to construct the attitude determination index. For the construction of the General Degradation Index (GDI), an attitude determination index associated with the degree of zoophagy was built first. The results indicate that extroversion, individualism, festivity, and immediacy were the traits that best characterized positive attitudes towards beef. On the other hand, negative attitudes of introspection, reflection, emotional character, and concern for the future marked the responses of those who answered.Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-20032021000200211Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural v.59 n.2 2021reponame:Revista de Economia e Sociologia Ruralinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural (SBESR)instacron:SBESR10.1590/1806-9479.2021.223297info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLucchese-Cheung,ThelmaSpers,Eduardo EugênioPereira,Matheus Wemersom GomesDias,Priscila Caroline Souza Paivaeng2021-01-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-20032021000200211Revistahttps://www.revistasober.org/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpsober@sober.org.br||resr@revistasober.org1806-94790103-2003opendoar:2021-01-18T00:00Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural - Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural (SBESR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Beef acceptance index proposition
title Beef acceptance index proposition
spellingShingle Beef acceptance index proposition
Lucchese-Cheung,Thelma
beef
consumption
zoophagy
sarcophagi
market segmentation
title_short Beef acceptance index proposition
title_full Beef acceptance index proposition
title_fullStr Beef acceptance index proposition
title_full_unstemmed Beef acceptance index proposition
title_sort Beef acceptance index proposition
author Lucchese-Cheung,Thelma
author_facet Lucchese-Cheung,Thelma
Spers,Eduardo Eugênio
Pereira,Matheus Wemersom Gomes
Dias,Priscila Caroline Souza Paiva
author_role author
author2 Spers,Eduardo Eugênio
Pereira,Matheus Wemersom Gomes
Dias,Priscila Caroline Souza Paiva
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lucchese-Cheung,Thelma
Spers,Eduardo Eugênio
Pereira,Matheus Wemersom Gomes
Dias,Priscila Caroline Souza Paiva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv beef
consumption
zoophagy
sarcophagi
market segmentation
topic beef
consumption
zoophagy
sarcophagi
market segmentation
description Summary: Beliefs, social rules, and food taboos influence the emotions we feel about food, determining our attitudes and consumption behaviors. The more a product represents values considered important to individuals, the greater the chance of being chosen for consumption. This article aimed to investigate levels of zoophagy and sarcophagy to propose an index to understand consumers' attitudes towards beef. Three hundred and eighty-five people answered a structured questionnaire that allowed them to assess personality traits and attitudes that can explain beef consumption, as well as its rejection. Factor analysis was the analytical model chosen to construct the attitude determination index. For the construction of the General Degradation Index (GDI), an attitude determination index associated with the degree of zoophagy was built first. The results indicate that extroversion, individualism, festivity, and immediacy were the traits that best characterized positive attitudes towards beef. On the other hand, negative attitudes of introspection, reflection, emotional character, and concern for the future marked the responses of those who answered.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-20032021000200211
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-20032021000200211
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1806-9479.2021.223297
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural v.59 n.2 2021
reponame:Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural (SBESR)
instacron:SBESR
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural (SBESR)
instacron_str SBESR
institution SBESR
reponame_str Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural
collection Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural - Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural (SBESR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sober@sober.org.br||resr@revistasober.org
_version_ 1752122558478548992