Evidence of orofacial myofunctional therapy patients with asthma and rhinitis: a systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | CoDAS |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822019000400601 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Purpose to evaluate the efficacy of orofacial myofunctional therapy in improving orofacial function and nasal breathing in patients with asthma and rhinitis and, consequently, achieve clinical control of these conditions. Research strategies We used the elements of the PICOT method (study population, intervention, comparison, outcomes and type of studies) to define the eligibility criteria: (1) Population: patients with asthma and rhinitis; (2) Intervention: orofacial myofunctional therapy to improve chewing, swallowing, and breathing; (3) Comparison: control group without orofacial myofunctional therapy; (4) Predefined outcomes: clinical control of asthma and improvement of orofacial functions and nasal breathing; (5) Study type: clinical trials. The data were collected from PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Science Direct, LILACS, Google Scholar, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), OATD, and Open Thesis, in November 2018. Selection criteria Randomized controlled trials published in full-text versions without language restriction, no filter was used. Data analysis Demographic characteristics of study participants, specific diagnosis of asthma and control medication, type, duration, intensity and follow-up of orofacial myofunctional therapy, and outcome data. The risk of bias was assessed according to the Cochrane guidelines for clinical trials. Results One study met the eligibility criteria: although the study has shown an improvement of functional control and clinical scores of asthma, the evidence is very low. Conclusion There is no scientific evidence on the efficacy of orofacial myofunctional therapy in improving clinical control, orofacial function, and nasal breathing in patients with asthma and rhinitis. |
id |
SBFA-1_56594645fd64dc19d71a76ead8564c94 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2317-17822019000400601 |
network_acronym_str |
SBFA-1 |
network_name_str |
CoDAS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evidence of orofacial myofunctional therapy patients with asthma and rhinitis: a systematic reviewAsthmaRhinitisSpeech-Language PathologyMyofunctional TherapyReviewABSTRACT Purpose to evaluate the efficacy of orofacial myofunctional therapy in improving orofacial function and nasal breathing in patients with asthma and rhinitis and, consequently, achieve clinical control of these conditions. Research strategies We used the elements of the PICOT method (study population, intervention, comparison, outcomes and type of studies) to define the eligibility criteria: (1) Population: patients with asthma and rhinitis; (2) Intervention: orofacial myofunctional therapy to improve chewing, swallowing, and breathing; (3) Comparison: control group without orofacial myofunctional therapy; (4) Predefined outcomes: clinical control of asthma and improvement of orofacial functions and nasal breathing; (5) Study type: clinical trials. The data were collected from PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Science Direct, LILACS, Google Scholar, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), OATD, and Open Thesis, in November 2018. Selection criteria Randomized controlled trials published in full-text versions without language restriction, no filter was used. Data analysis Demographic characteristics of study participants, specific diagnosis of asthma and control medication, type, duration, intensity and follow-up of orofacial myofunctional therapy, and outcome data. The risk of bias was assessed according to the Cochrane guidelines for clinical trials. Results One study met the eligibility criteria: although the study has shown an improvement of functional control and clinical scores of asthma, the evidence is very low. Conclusion There is no scientific evidence on the efficacy of orofacial myofunctional therapy in improving clinical control, orofacial function, and nasal breathing in patients with asthma and rhinitis.Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822019000400601CoDAS v.31 n.4 2019reponame:CoDASinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)instacron:SBFA10.1590/2317-1782/20192019009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAraújo,Brenda Carla LimaSimões,Silvia de MagalhãesMoreira,Marcela Gama SantanaMendes,Amanda Louize FélixMartins-Filho,Paulo Ricardo Saqueteeng2021-12-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2317-17822019000400601Revistahttps://www.codas.org.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcodas@editoracubo.com.br||revista@codas.org.br2317-17822317-1782opendoar:2021-12-03T00:00CoDAS - Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evidence of orofacial myofunctional therapy patients with asthma and rhinitis: a systematic review |
title |
Evidence of orofacial myofunctional therapy patients with asthma and rhinitis: a systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Evidence of orofacial myofunctional therapy patients with asthma and rhinitis: a systematic review Araújo,Brenda Carla Lima Asthma Rhinitis Speech-Language Pathology Myofunctional Therapy Review |
title_short |
Evidence of orofacial myofunctional therapy patients with asthma and rhinitis: a systematic review |
title_full |
Evidence of orofacial myofunctional therapy patients with asthma and rhinitis: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Evidence of orofacial myofunctional therapy patients with asthma and rhinitis: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evidence of orofacial myofunctional therapy patients with asthma and rhinitis: a systematic review |
title_sort |
Evidence of orofacial myofunctional therapy patients with asthma and rhinitis: a systematic review |
author |
Araújo,Brenda Carla Lima |
author_facet |
Araújo,Brenda Carla Lima Simões,Silvia de Magalhães Moreira,Marcela Gama Santana Mendes,Amanda Louize Félix Martins-Filho,Paulo Ricardo Saquete |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Simões,Silvia de Magalhães Moreira,Marcela Gama Santana Mendes,Amanda Louize Félix Martins-Filho,Paulo Ricardo Saquete |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Araújo,Brenda Carla Lima Simões,Silvia de Magalhães Moreira,Marcela Gama Santana Mendes,Amanda Louize Félix Martins-Filho,Paulo Ricardo Saquete |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Asthma Rhinitis Speech-Language Pathology Myofunctional Therapy Review |
topic |
Asthma Rhinitis Speech-Language Pathology Myofunctional Therapy Review |
description |
ABSTRACT Purpose to evaluate the efficacy of orofacial myofunctional therapy in improving orofacial function and nasal breathing in patients with asthma and rhinitis and, consequently, achieve clinical control of these conditions. Research strategies We used the elements of the PICOT method (study population, intervention, comparison, outcomes and type of studies) to define the eligibility criteria: (1) Population: patients with asthma and rhinitis; (2) Intervention: orofacial myofunctional therapy to improve chewing, swallowing, and breathing; (3) Comparison: control group without orofacial myofunctional therapy; (4) Predefined outcomes: clinical control of asthma and improvement of orofacial functions and nasal breathing; (5) Study type: clinical trials. The data were collected from PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Science Direct, LILACS, Google Scholar, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), OATD, and Open Thesis, in November 2018. Selection criteria Randomized controlled trials published in full-text versions without language restriction, no filter was used. Data analysis Demographic characteristics of study participants, specific diagnosis of asthma and control medication, type, duration, intensity and follow-up of orofacial myofunctional therapy, and outcome data. The risk of bias was assessed according to the Cochrane guidelines for clinical trials. Results One study met the eligibility criteria: although the study has shown an improvement of functional control and clinical scores of asthma, the evidence is very low. Conclusion There is no scientific evidence on the efficacy of orofacial myofunctional therapy in improving clinical control, orofacial function, and nasal breathing in patients with asthma and rhinitis. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822019000400601 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822019000400601 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/2317-1782/20192019009 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
CoDAS v.31 n.4 2019 reponame:CoDAS instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA) instacron:SBFA |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA) |
instacron_str |
SBFA |
institution |
SBFA |
reponame_str |
CoDAS |
collection |
CoDAS |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CoDAS - Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
codas@editoracubo.com.br||revista@codas.org.br |
_version_ |
1752122442542743552 |