Analgesia in newborns: a case-control study of the efficacy of nutritive and non-nutritive sucking stimuli

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima,Ana Henriques
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Hermont,Ana Paula, Friche,Amélia Augusta de Lima
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: CoDAS
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822013000400011
Resumo: PURPOSE: To verify the nutritive and non-nutritive stimuli efficacy in the newborn's response to pain during venipuncture. METHODS: The main sample was composed of 64 newborns that were randomly divided into three groups. The first group (n=20) received nutritive sucking stimulus that was performed through maternal breastfeeding. The second group (n=21) received non-nutritive sucking stimulus that was performed through the introduction of the researcher little finger in the newborn's oral cavity. The third group or control group (n=23) did not receive any analgesia stimulus. The newborns were evaluated using the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale, and the responses to painful stimuli were compared. RESULTS: The nutritive as well as non-nutritive suction methods provided a comforting effect, resulting in lower pain response scores (p<0.05). There was no difference between the analgesia provided by both methods (p&gt;0.05). CONCLUSION: The nutritive and the non-nutritive sucking stimuli proved to be efficacious tools in relieving pain among newborns.
id SBFA-1_77899407ad7ad79a00155ee417d65e36
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2317-17822013000400011
network_acronym_str SBFA-1
network_name_str CoDAS
repository_id_str
spelling Analgesia in newborns: a case-control study of the efficacy of nutritive and non-nutritive sucking stimuliPainAnalgesiaSucking behaviorNewbornCase-control studiesPURPOSE: To verify the nutritive and non-nutritive stimuli efficacy in the newborn's response to pain during venipuncture. METHODS: The main sample was composed of 64 newborns that were randomly divided into three groups. The first group (n=20) received nutritive sucking stimulus that was performed through maternal breastfeeding. The second group (n=21) received non-nutritive sucking stimulus that was performed through the introduction of the researcher little finger in the newborn's oral cavity. The third group or control group (n=23) did not receive any analgesia stimulus. The newborns were evaluated using the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale, and the responses to painful stimuli were compared. RESULTS: The nutritive as well as non-nutritive suction methods provided a comforting effect, resulting in lower pain response scores (p<0.05). There was no difference between the analgesia provided by both methods (p&gt;0.05). CONCLUSION: The nutritive and the non-nutritive sucking stimuli proved to be efficacious tools in relieving pain among newborns.Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia2013-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822013000400011CoDAS v.25 n.4 2013reponame:CoDASinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)instacron:SBFA10.1590/S2317-17822013005000002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima,Ana HenriquesHermont,Ana PaulaFriche,Amélia Augusta de Limaeng2013-09-25T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2317-17822013000400011Revistahttps://www.codas.org.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcodas@editoracubo.com.br||revista@codas.org.br2317-17822317-1782opendoar:2013-09-25T00:00CoDAS - Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analgesia in newborns: a case-control study of the efficacy of nutritive and non-nutritive sucking stimuli
title Analgesia in newborns: a case-control study of the efficacy of nutritive and non-nutritive sucking stimuli
spellingShingle Analgesia in newborns: a case-control study of the efficacy of nutritive and non-nutritive sucking stimuli
Lima,Ana Henriques
Pain
Analgesia
Sucking behavior
Newborn
Case-control studies
title_short Analgesia in newborns: a case-control study of the efficacy of nutritive and non-nutritive sucking stimuli
title_full Analgesia in newborns: a case-control study of the efficacy of nutritive and non-nutritive sucking stimuli
title_fullStr Analgesia in newborns: a case-control study of the efficacy of nutritive and non-nutritive sucking stimuli
title_full_unstemmed Analgesia in newborns: a case-control study of the efficacy of nutritive and non-nutritive sucking stimuli
title_sort Analgesia in newborns: a case-control study of the efficacy of nutritive and non-nutritive sucking stimuli
author Lima,Ana Henriques
author_facet Lima,Ana Henriques
Hermont,Ana Paula
Friche,Amélia Augusta de Lima
author_role author
author2 Hermont,Ana Paula
Friche,Amélia Augusta de Lima
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima,Ana Henriques
Hermont,Ana Paula
Friche,Amélia Augusta de Lima
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pain
Analgesia
Sucking behavior
Newborn
Case-control studies
topic Pain
Analgesia
Sucking behavior
Newborn
Case-control studies
description PURPOSE: To verify the nutritive and non-nutritive stimuli efficacy in the newborn's response to pain during venipuncture. METHODS: The main sample was composed of 64 newborns that were randomly divided into three groups. The first group (n=20) received nutritive sucking stimulus that was performed through maternal breastfeeding. The second group (n=21) received non-nutritive sucking stimulus that was performed through the introduction of the researcher little finger in the newborn's oral cavity. The third group or control group (n=23) did not receive any analgesia stimulus. The newborns were evaluated using the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale, and the responses to painful stimuli were compared. RESULTS: The nutritive as well as non-nutritive suction methods provided a comforting effect, resulting in lower pain response scores (p<0.05). There was no difference between the analgesia provided by both methods (p&gt;0.05). CONCLUSION: The nutritive and the non-nutritive sucking stimuli proved to be efficacious tools in relieving pain among newborns.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822013000400011
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822013000400011
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S2317-17822013005000002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv CoDAS v.25 n.4 2013
reponame:CoDAS
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)
instacron:SBFA
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)
instacron_str SBFA
institution SBFA
reponame_str CoDAS
collection CoDAS
repository.name.fl_str_mv CoDAS - Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv codas@editoracubo.com.br||revista@codas.org.br
_version_ 1752122440038744064