Analgesia in newborns: a case-control study of the efficacy of nutritive and non-nutritive sucking stimuli
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | CoDAS |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822013000400011 |
Resumo: | PURPOSE: To verify the nutritive and non-nutritive stimuli efficacy in the newborn's response to pain during venipuncture. METHODS: The main sample was composed of 64 newborns that were randomly divided into three groups. The first group (n=20) received nutritive sucking stimulus that was performed through maternal breastfeeding. The second group (n=21) received non-nutritive sucking stimulus that was performed through the introduction of the researcher little finger in the newborn's oral cavity. The third group or control group (n=23) did not receive any analgesia stimulus. The newborns were evaluated using the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale, and the responses to painful stimuli were compared. RESULTS: The nutritive as well as non-nutritive suction methods provided a comforting effect, resulting in lower pain response scores (p<0.05). There was no difference between the analgesia provided by both methods (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: The nutritive and the non-nutritive sucking stimuli proved to be efficacious tools in relieving pain among newborns. |
id |
SBFA-1_77899407ad7ad79a00155ee417d65e36 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2317-17822013000400011 |
network_acronym_str |
SBFA-1 |
network_name_str |
CoDAS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Analgesia in newborns: a case-control study of the efficacy of nutritive and non-nutritive sucking stimuliPainAnalgesiaSucking behaviorNewbornCase-control studiesPURPOSE: To verify the nutritive and non-nutritive stimuli efficacy in the newborn's response to pain during venipuncture. METHODS: The main sample was composed of 64 newborns that were randomly divided into three groups. The first group (n=20) received nutritive sucking stimulus that was performed through maternal breastfeeding. The second group (n=21) received non-nutritive sucking stimulus that was performed through the introduction of the researcher little finger in the newborn's oral cavity. The third group or control group (n=23) did not receive any analgesia stimulus. The newborns were evaluated using the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale, and the responses to painful stimuli were compared. RESULTS: The nutritive as well as non-nutritive suction methods provided a comforting effect, resulting in lower pain response scores (p<0.05). There was no difference between the analgesia provided by both methods (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: The nutritive and the non-nutritive sucking stimuli proved to be efficacious tools in relieving pain among newborns.Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia2013-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822013000400011CoDAS v.25 n.4 2013reponame:CoDASinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)instacron:SBFA10.1590/S2317-17822013005000002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima,Ana HenriquesHermont,Ana PaulaFriche,Amélia Augusta de Limaeng2013-09-25T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2317-17822013000400011Revistahttps://www.codas.org.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcodas@editoracubo.com.br||revista@codas.org.br2317-17822317-1782opendoar:2013-09-25T00:00CoDAS - Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analgesia in newborns: a case-control study of the efficacy of nutritive and non-nutritive sucking stimuli |
title |
Analgesia in newborns: a case-control study of the efficacy of nutritive and non-nutritive sucking stimuli |
spellingShingle |
Analgesia in newborns: a case-control study of the efficacy of nutritive and non-nutritive sucking stimuli Lima,Ana Henriques Pain Analgesia Sucking behavior Newborn Case-control studies |
title_short |
Analgesia in newborns: a case-control study of the efficacy of nutritive and non-nutritive sucking stimuli |
title_full |
Analgesia in newborns: a case-control study of the efficacy of nutritive and non-nutritive sucking stimuli |
title_fullStr |
Analgesia in newborns: a case-control study of the efficacy of nutritive and non-nutritive sucking stimuli |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analgesia in newborns: a case-control study of the efficacy of nutritive and non-nutritive sucking stimuli |
title_sort |
Analgesia in newborns: a case-control study of the efficacy of nutritive and non-nutritive sucking stimuli |
author |
Lima,Ana Henriques |
author_facet |
Lima,Ana Henriques Hermont,Ana Paula Friche,Amélia Augusta de Lima |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Hermont,Ana Paula Friche,Amélia Augusta de Lima |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lima,Ana Henriques Hermont,Ana Paula Friche,Amélia Augusta de Lima |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Pain Analgesia Sucking behavior Newborn Case-control studies |
topic |
Pain Analgesia Sucking behavior Newborn Case-control studies |
description |
PURPOSE: To verify the nutritive and non-nutritive stimuli efficacy in the newborn's response to pain during venipuncture. METHODS: The main sample was composed of 64 newborns that were randomly divided into three groups. The first group (n=20) received nutritive sucking stimulus that was performed through maternal breastfeeding. The second group (n=21) received non-nutritive sucking stimulus that was performed through the introduction of the researcher little finger in the newborn's oral cavity. The third group or control group (n=23) did not receive any analgesia stimulus. The newborns were evaluated using the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale, and the responses to painful stimuli were compared. RESULTS: The nutritive as well as non-nutritive suction methods provided a comforting effect, resulting in lower pain response scores (p<0.05). There was no difference between the analgesia provided by both methods (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: The nutritive and the non-nutritive sucking stimuli proved to be efficacious tools in relieving pain among newborns. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822013000400011 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822013000400011 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S2317-17822013005000002 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
CoDAS v.25 n.4 2013 reponame:CoDAS instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA) instacron:SBFA |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA) |
instacron_str |
SBFA |
institution |
SBFA |
reponame_str |
CoDAS |
collection |
CoDAS |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CoDAS - Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
codas@editoracubo.com.br||revista@codas.org.br |
_version_ |
1752122440038744064 |