Do body mass index and fat volume influence vocal quality, phonatory range, and aerodynamics in females?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barsties,Ben
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Verfaillie,Rudi, Roy,Nelson, Maryn,Youri
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: CoDAS
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822013000400003
Resumo: PURPOSE: To analyze the impact of body weight and body fat volume on selected parameters of vocal quality, phonatory range, and aerodynamics in females. METHODS: Based on measurements of body mass index in combination with body fat volume, 29 normophonic female subjects were classified as normal weight, underweight, and obese. Voice quality was investigated via auditory-perceptual ratings of breathiness, roughness, and overall dysphonia severity, via various acoustic measures and a multiparametric index. Phonatory range performance was examined using selected measures of the voice range profile and speech range profile. Measures of vocally relevant aerodynamics included vital capacity (i.e., VC), expected VC, phonation quotient, and maximum phonation time (i.e., MPT). RESULTS: Significant differences between the three weight groups were found across several measures of intensity, VC, MPT, and shimmer. As compared to the other groups, significantly higher values of maximum and minimum intensity levels, as well as sound pressure level during habitual running speech were observed for the obese group (all p-values<0.05); whereas, the underweight group had significantly lower values for VC and ratio of expected to measured VC (p-values<0.01). Furthermore, underweight subjects differed significantly as compared to normal weight subjects with lower MPT (p=0.025) and higher lowest-F0 (p=0.035). Finally the obese group showed significantly lower shimmer values than the normal weight subjects (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Body weight and body fat volume appear to influence select objective measures of voice quality, vocal aerodynamics, and phonatory range performance.
id SBFA-1_a00c131d57688242b1c247d023569523
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2317-17822013000400003
network_acronym_str SBFA-1
network_name_str CoDAS
repository_id_str
spelling Do body mass index and fat volume influence vocal quality, phonatory range, and aerodynamics in females?Body mass indexAdipose tissueVoice qualityLarynxAir AnalysisPURPOSE: To analyze the impact of body weight and body fat volume on selected parameters of vocal quality, phonatory range, and aerodynamics in females. METHODS: Based on measurements of body mass index in combination with body fat volume, 29 normophonic female subjects were classified as normal weight, underweight, and obese. Voice quality was investigated via auditory-perceptual ratings of breathiness, roughness, and overall dysphonia severity, via various acoustic measures and a multiparametric index. Phonatory range performance was examined using selected measures of the voice range profile and speech range profile. Measures of vocally relevant aerodynamics included vital capacity (i.e., VC), expected VC, phonation quotient, and maximum phonation time (i.e., MPT). RESULTS: Significant differences between the three weight groups were found across several measures of intensity, VC, MPT, and shimmer. As compared to the other groups, significantly higher values of maximum and minimum intensity levels, as well as sound pressure level during habitual running speech were observed for the obese group (all p-values<0.05); whereas, the underweight group had significantly lower values for VC and ratio of expected to measured VC (p-values<0.01). Furthermore, underweight subjects differed significantly as compared to normal weight subjects with lower MPT (p=0.025) and higher lowest-F0 (p=0.035). Finally the obese group showed significantly lower shimmer values than the normal weight subjects (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Body weight and body fat volume appear to influence select objective measures of voice quality, vocal aerodynamics, and phonatory range performance.Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia2013-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822013000400003CoDAS v.25 n.4 2013reponame:CoDASinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)instacron:SBFA10.1590/S2317-17822013000400003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarsties,BenVerfaillie,RudiRoy,NelsonMaryn,Yourieng2013-09-25T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2317-17822013000400003Revistahttps://www.codas.org.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcodas@editoracubo.com.br||revista@codas.org.br2317-17822317-1782opendoar:2013-09-25T00:00CoDAS - Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Do body mass index and fat volume influence vocal quality, phonatory range, and aerodynamics in females?
title Do body mass index and fat volume influence vocal quality, phonatory range, and aerodynamics in females?
spellingShingle Do body mass index and fat volume influence vocal quality, phonatory range, and aerodynamics in females?
Barsties,Ben
Body mass index
Adipose tissue
Voice quality
Larynx
Air Analysis
title_short Do body mass index and fat volume influence vocal quality, phonatory range, and aerodynamics in females?
title_full Do body mass index and fat volume influence vocal quality, phonatory range, and aerodynamics in females?
title_fullStr Do body mass index and fat volume influence vocal quality, phonatory range, and aerodynamics in females?
title_full_unstemmed Do body mass index and fat volume influence vocal quality, phonatory range, and aerodynamics in females?
title_sort Do body mass index and fat volume influence vocal quality, phonatory range, and aerodynamics in females?
author Barsties,Ben
author_facet Barsties,Ben
Verfaillie,Rudi
Roy,Nelson
Maryn,Youri
author_role author
author2 Verfaillie,Rudi
Roy,Nelson
Maryn,Youri
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barsties,Ben
Verfaillie,Rudi
Roy,Nelson
Maryn,Youri
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Body mass index
Adipose tissue
Voice quality
Larynx
Air Analysis
topic Body mass index
Adipose tissue
Voice quality
Larynx
Air Analysis
description PURPOSE: To analyze the impact of body weight and body fat volume on selected parameters of vocal quality, phonatory range, and aerodynamics in females. METHODS: Based on measurements of body mass index in combination with body fat volume, 29 normophonic female subjects were classified as normal weight, underweight, and obese. Voice quality was investigated via auditory-perceptual ratings of breathiness, roughness, and overall dysphonia severity, via various acoustic measures and a multiparametric index. Phonatory range performance was examined using selected measures of the voice range profile and speech range profile. Measures of vocally relevant aerodynamics included vital capacity (i.e., VC), expected VC, phonation quotient, and maximum phonation time (i.e., MPT). RESULTS: Significant differences between the three weight groups were found across several measures of intensity, VC, MPT, and shimmer. As compared to the other groups, significantly higher values of maximum and minimum intensity levels, as well as sound pressure level during habitual running speech were observed for the obese group (all p-values<0.05); whereas, the underweight group had significantly lower values for VC and ratio of expected to measured VC (p-values<0.01). Furthermore, underweight subjects differed significantly as compared to normal weight subjects with lower MPT (p=0.025) and higher lowest-F0 (p=0.035). Finally the obese group showed significantly lower shimmer values than the normal weight subjects (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Body weight and body fat volume appear to influence select objective measures of voice quality, vocal aerodynamics, and phonatory range performance.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822013000400003
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822013000400003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S2317-17822013000400003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv CoDAS v.25 n.4 2013
reponame:CoDAS
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)
instacron:SBFA
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)
instacron_str SBFA
institution SBFA
reponame_str CoDAS
collection CoDAS
repository.name.fl_str_mv CoDAS - Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv codas@editoracubo.com.br||revista@codas.org.br
_version_ 1752122439958003712