Surface electromyographic biofeedback for behavioral dysphonia in adult people: a systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | CoDAS |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822018000600601 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Purpose To review systematically the literature and to analyze the effectiveness of surface electromyographic biofeedback in the rehabilitation of adults with behavioral dysphonia. Research strategies Two authors performed an independent search in the following databases: Clinical Trials, Cochrane Library, Embase, LILACS, PubMed, and Web of Science. A specific search strategy was developed for each database. Selection criteria The review included studies that examined the effectiveness of surface electromyographic biofeedback compared to other direct vocal therapy intervention in adults with behavioral dysphonia. There were no restrictions in regard to language or date of publication. Data analysis Analysis of the risk of bias, heterogeneity, quantitative and qualitative data, sensitivity, subgroups, and publication bias. Results 51 studies were identified, but only two cohort studies remained as prospects for analysis. The studies showed 100% uncertain risk of selection, performance, and detection bias. There was a high degree of clinical heterogeneity. The descriptive analysis showed a reduction in muscle electrical activity and improvement in vocal self-assessment using electromyographic biofeedback; however, it was not possible to calculate the effect size of the interventions. The present study was limited by the fact that it was unable to show a consensus for the majority of data analyzed. Conclusion The available literature does not support a conclusive finding about the effectiveness of surface electromyographic biofeedback compared to other direct interventions used in the rehabilitation of adults with behavioral dysphonia. The studies analyzed vary widely in their clinical procedures and methodology, making it impossible to determine the procedure's effectiveness. |
id |
SBFA-1_a2465cb236872e933799a3906d8ad5c5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2317-17822018000600601 |
network_acronym_str |
SBFA-1 |
network_name_str |
CoDAS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Surface electromyographic biofeedback for behavioral dysphonia in adult people: a systematic reviewDysphoniaFeedbackTherapeuticsVoiceVoice TrainingABSTRACT Purpose To review systematically the literature and to analyze the effectiveness of surface electromyographic biofeedback in the rehabilitation of adults with behavioral dysphonia. Research strategies Two authors performed an independent search in the following databases: Clinical Trials, Cochrane Library, Embase, LILACS, PubMed, and Web of Science. A specific search strategy was developed for each database. Selection criteria The review included studies that examined the effectiveness of surface electromyographic biofeedback compared to other direct vocal therapy intervention in adults with behavioral dysphonia. There were no restrictions in regard to language or date of publication. Data analysis Analysis of the risk of bias, heterogeneity, quantitative and qualitative data, sensitivity, subgroups, and publication bias. Results 51 studies were identified, but only two cohort studies remained as prospects for analysis. The studies showed 100% uncertain risk of selection, performance, and detection bias. There was a high degree of clinical heterogeneity. The descriptive analysis showed a reduction in muscle electrical activity and improvement in vocal self-assessment using electromyographic biofeedback; however, it was not possible to calculate the effect size of the interventions. The present study was limited by the fact that it was unable to show a consensus for the majority of data analyzed. Conclusion The available literature does not support a conclusive finding about the effectiveness of surface electromyographic biofeedback compared to other direct interventions used in the rehabilitation of adults with behavioral dysphonia. The studies analyzed vary widely in their clinical procedures and methodology, making it impossible to determine the procedure's effectiveness.Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822018000600601CoDAS v.30 n.6 2018reponame:CoDASinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)instacron:SBFA10.1590/2317-1782/20182018031info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro,Vanessa VeisVitor,Jhonatan da SilvaHonório,Heitor MarquesBrasolotto,Alcione GhediniSilverio,Kelly Cristina Alveseng2018-11-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2317-17822018000600601Revistahttps://www.codas.org.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcodas@editoracubo.com.br||revista@codas.org.br2317-17822317-1782opendoar:2018-11-22T00:00CoDAS - Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Surface electromyographic biofeedback for behavioral dysphonia in adult people: a systematic review |
title |
Surface electromyographic biofeedback for behavioral dysphonia in adult people: a systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Surface electromyographic biofeedback for behavioral dysphonia in adult people: a systematic review Ribeiro,Vanessa Veis Dysphonia Feedback Therapeutics Voice Voice Training |
title_short |
Surface electromyographic biofeedback for behavioral dysphonia in adult people: a systematic review |
title_full |
Surface electromyographic biofeedback for behavioral dysphonia in adult people: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Surface electromyographic biofeedback for behavioral dysphonia in adult people: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Surface electromyographic biofeedback for behavioral dysphonia in adult people: a systematic review |
title_sort |
Surface electromyographic biofeedback for behavioral dysphonia in adult people: a systematic review |
author |
Ribeiro,Vanessa Veis |
author_facet |
Ribeiro,Vanessa Veis Vitor,Jhonatan da Silva Honório,Heitor Marques Brasolotto,Alcione Ghedini Silverio,Kelly Cristina Alves |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vitor,Jhonatan da Silva Honório,Heitor Marques Brasolotto,Alcione Ghedini Silverio,Kelly Cristina Alves |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ribeiro,Vanessa Veis Vitor,Jhonatan da Silva Honório,Heitor Marques Brasolotto,Alcione Ghedini Silverio,Kelly Cristina Alves |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dysphonia Feedback Therapeutics Voice Voice Training |
topic |
Dysphonia Feedback Therapeutics Voice Voice Training |
description |
ABSTRACT Purpose To review systematically the literature and to analyze the effectiveness of surface electromyographic biofeedback in the rehabilitation of adults with behavioral dysphonia. Research strategies Two authors performed an independent search in the following databases: Clinical Trials, Cochrane Library, Embase, LILACS, PubMed, and Web of Science. A specific search strategy was developed for each database. Selection criteria The review included studies that examined the effectiveness of surface electromyographic biofeedback compared to other direct vocal therapy intervention in adults with behavioral dysphonia. There were no restrictions in regard to language or date of publication. Data analysis Analysis of the risk of bias, heterogeneity, quantitative and qualitative data, sensitivity, subgroups, and publication bias. Results 51 studies were identified, but only two cohort studies remained as prospects for analysis. The studies showed 100% uncertain risk of selection, performance, and detection bias. There was a high degree of clinical heterogeneity. The descriptive analysis showed a reduction in muscle electrical activity and improvement in vocal self-assessment using electromyographic biofeedback; however, it was not possible to calculate the effect size of the interventions. The present study was limited by the fact that it was unable to show a consensus for the majority of data analyzed. Conclusion The available literature does not support a conclusive finding about the effectiveness of surface electromyographic biofeedback compared to other direct interventions used in the rehabilitation of adults with behavioral dysphonia. The studies analyzed vary widely in their clinical procedures and methodology, making it impossible to determine the procedure's effectiveness. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822018000600601 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822018000600601 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/2317-1782/20182018031 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
CoDAS v.30 n.6 2018 reponame:CoDAS instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA) instacron:SBFA |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA) |
instacron_str |
SBFA |
institution |
SBFA |
reponame_str |
CoDAS |
collection |
CoDAS |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CoDAS - Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
codas@editoracubo.com.br||revista@codas.org.br |
_version_ |
1752122442444177408 |