Global developmental abilities of cochlear implanted children with spastic cerebral palsy: two experimental groups

• Autor(a) principal: Lamônica,Dionísia Aparecida Cusin
• Data de Publicação: 2014
• Outros Autores: Santos,Maria Jaquelini Dias dos, Paiva,Cora Sofia Takaya, Silva,Leandra Tabanez do Nascimento
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: CoDAS
• Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822014000300213
• topic: Cerebral palsy; Cochlear implantation; Language; Hearing; Communication

PURPOSE: To analyze gross motor, fine motor-adaptive, language, social function performance, and communicative behaviors among cochlear-implanted children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP) and children with CP without hearing loss (HL) and to compare them with children with normal development. METHODS: Prospective cross-sectional study involving 12 children with mean age of 63 months, distributed into two experimental groups: G1 - 4 children with CP and cochlear implant (CI) users and G2 - 4 children with CP without HL. A third group (G3) was the control group with four typically developing children. In the experimental groups, six children were classified in level II and two in level IV, using the Gross Motor Function Classification System. We used the Denver Developmental Screening Test II and the Communicative Behavior Observation (CBO). RESULTS: G3 showed better performance than G1 and G2 in all evaluations. G2 showed better results than G1 in language, communication, personal-social, and fine motor-adaptive areas, except in the gross motor area. Aspects of language and communicative behaviors were lower in both experimental groups, especially in G1. Skills related to personal-social area showed no differences among the groups. CONCLUSION: Motor impairment of G1 and G2 and HL in G1 affected the development in the assessed areas, but these factors did not restrict personal-social development. Children with CP did not achieve high development in social function; however, the difference with relation to G3 was not statically significant. The CI provided a channel for oral language reception and social interaction, which has a key role in determining the quality of life.