Report on the Malungo expedition to the Erepecuru river, Oriximiná, Brazil. Part I: is there a difference between black and white breu?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-695X2016000500647 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Species belonging to Burseraceae produce an oleoresin known in the north of Brazil as breu. They comprise an essential oil with a complex composition, and are used in Amazonia for smoking the environment, to caulk boats and for medicinal purposes. Depending on its organoleptic characteristics and on the breu-producing species, they are called white or black breu. In this work, we provide data about the breu-producing species occurring in the quilombola region of the Erepecuru river, the chemical composition, and whether it is possible to differentiate them based on their chemical composition and/or botanical identification. Aerial samples from breu trees and oleoresins were collected from 10 different individuals at 6 different sites on the Erepecuru river under the guidance of the quilombolas. Essential oils were extracted by hydrodistillation and characterized by GC–MS. From the analysis, 126 different substances were identified, with a large quantitative and qualitative variation. To better understand the chemical variations within the samples and to sort the variation into the categories of white or black breu as identified by the quilombola, we sorted the oil samples into five different sets according to their major compounds (A: δ-3-carene; B: p-cymene; C: γ-cadinene/p-cymene; D: limonene, β-phellandrene/α-terpineol; E: α-pinene/limonene). Essential oils from samples of white breu had the highest concentration of α-pinene, while a similarity in chemical composition could not be established for the black breu samples (sets A, B and C). Furthermore, a chemical similarity between a black breu (Protium heptaphyllum (Aubl.) Marchand) and a white breu (Protium decandrum (Aubl.) Marchand) sample was evidenced. In conclusion, it is difficult to establish definitions for white and black breu based on chemical, botanical or regional names. This designation is more cultural and regional than scientific and is based on the oleoresin production volume, its color aspect and scent. |
id |
SBFGNOSIA-1_254c4bb7c17736ccb5244e8f0d48aae8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-695X2016000500647 |
network_acronym_str |
SBFGNOSIA-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Report on the Malungo expedition to the Erepecuru river, Oriximiná, Brazil. Part I: is there a difference between black and white breu?BurseraceaeProtiumBreuQuilombolaEssential oilABSTRACT Species belonging to Burseraceae produce an oleoresin known in the north of Brazil as breu. They comprise an essential oil with a complex composition, and are used in Amazonia for smoking the environment, to caulk boats and for medicinal purposes. Depending on its organoleptic characteristics and on the breu-producing species, they are called white or black breu. In this work, we provide data about the breu-producing species occurring in the quilombola region of the Erepecuru river, the chemical composition, and whether it is possible to differentiate them based on their chemical composition and/or botanical identification. Aerial samples from breu trees and oleoresins were collected from 10 different individuals at 6 different sites on the Erepecuru river under the guidance of the quilombolas. Essential oils were extracted by hydrodistillation and characterized by GC–MS. From the analysis, 126 different substances were identified, with a large quantitative and qualitative variation. To better understand the chemical variations within the samples and to sort the variation into the categories of white or black breu as identified by the quilombola, we sorted the oil samples into five different sets according to their major compounds (A: δ-3-carene; B: p-cymene; C: γ-cadinene/p-cymene; D: limonene, β-phellandrene/α-terpineol; E: α-pinene/limonene). Essential oils from samples of white breu had the highest concentration of α-pinene, while a similarity in chemical composition could not be established for the black breu samples (sets A, B and C). Furthermore, a chemical similarity between a black breu (Protium heptaphyllum (Aubl.) Marchand) and a white breu (Protium decandrum (Aubl.) Marchand) sample was evidenced. In conclusion, it is difficult to establish definitions for white and black breu based on chemical, botanical or regional names. This designation is more cultural and regional than scientific and is based on the oleoresin production volume, its color aspect and scent.Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia2016-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-695X2016000500647Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia v.26 n.5 2016reponame:Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia (SBFgnosia)instacron:SBFGNOSIA10.1016/j.bjp.2016.05.003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Eduardo Rodrigues daOliveira,Danilo Ribeiro deMelo,Maria de Fátima FigueiredoBizzo,Humberto RibeiroLeitão,Suzana Guimarãeseng2016-10-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-695X2016000500647Revistahttp://www.sbfgnosia.org.br/revista/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprbgnosia@ltf.ufpb.br1981-528X0102-695Xopendoar:2016-10-10T00:00Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia (SBFgnosia)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Report on the Malungo expedition to the Erepecuru river, Oriximiná, Brazil. Part I: is there a difference between black and white breu? |
title |
Report on the Malungo expedition to the Erepecuru river, Oriximiná, Brazil. Part I: is there a difference between black and white breu? |
spellingShingle |
Report on the Malungo expedition to the Erepecuru river, Oriximiná, Brazil. Part I: is there a difference between black and white breu? Silva,Eduardo Rodrigues da Burseraceae Protium Breu Quilombola Essential oil |
title_short |
Report on the Malungo expedition to the Erepecuru river, Oriximiná, Brazil. Part I: is there a difference between black and white breu? |
title_full |
Report on the Malungo expedition to the Erepecuru river, Oriximiná, Brazil. Part I: is there a difference between black and white breu? |
title_fullStr |
Report on the Malungo expedition to the Erepecuru river, Oriximiná, Brazil. Part I: is there a difference between black and white breu? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Report on the Malungo expedition to the Erepecuru river, Oriximiná, Brazil. Part I: is there a difference between black and white breu? |
title_sort |
Report on the Malungo expedition to the Erepecuru river, Oriximiná, Brazil. Part I: is there a difference between black and white breu? |
author |
Silva,Eduardo Rodrigues da |
author_facet |
Silva,Eduardo Rodrigues da Oliveira,Danilo Ribeiro de Melo,Maria de Fátima Figueiredo Bizzo,Humberto Ribeiro Leitão,Suzana Guimarães |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira,Danilo Ribeiro de Melo,Maria de Fátima Figueiredo Bizzo,Humberto Ribeiro Leitão,Suzana Guimarães |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva,Eduardo Rodrigues da Oliveira,Danilo Ribeiro de Melo,Maria de Fátima Figueiredo Bizzo,Humberto Ribeiro Leitão,Suzana Guimarães |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Burseraceae Protium Breu Quilombola Essential oil |
topic |
Burseraceae Protium Breu Quilombola Essential oil |
description |
ABSTRACT Species belonging to Burseraceae produce an oleoresin known in the north of Brazil as breu. They comprise an essential oil with a complex composition, and are used in Amazonia for smoking the environment, to caulk boats and for medicinal purposes. Depending on its organoleptic characteristics and on the breu-producing species, they are called white or black breu. In this work, we provide data about the breu-producing species occurring in the quilombola region of the Erepecuru river, the chemical composition, and whether it is possible to differentiate them based on their chemical composition and/or botanical identification. Aerial samples from breu trees and oleoresins were collected from 10 different individuals at 6 different sites on the Erepecuru river under the guidance of the quilombolas. Essential oils were extracted by hydrodistillation and characterized by GC–MS. From the analysis, 126 different substances were identified, with a large quantitative and qualitative variation. To better understand the chemical variations within the samples and to sort the variation into the categories of white or black breu as identified by the quilombola, we sorted the oil samples into five different sets according to their major compounds (A: δ-3-carene; B: p-cymene; C: γ-cadinene/p-cymene; D: limonene, β-phellandrene/α-terpineol; E: α-pinene/limonene). Essential oils from samples of white breu had the highest concentration of α-pinene, while a similarity in chemical composition could not be established for the black breu samples (sets A, B and C). Furthermore, a chemical similarity between a black breu (Protium heptaphyllum (Aubl.) Marchand) and a white breu (Protium decandrum (Aubl.) Marchand) sample was evidenced. In conclusion, it is difficult to establish definitions for white and black breu based on chemical, botanical or regional names. This designation is more cultural and regional than scientific and is based on the oleoresin production volume, its color aspect and scent. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-695X2016000500647 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-695X2016000500647 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1016/j.bjp.2016.05.003 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia v.26 n.5 2016 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia (SBFgnosia) instacron:SBFGNOSIA |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia (SBFgnosia) |
instacron_str |
SBFGNOSIA |
institution |
SBFGNOSIA |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia (SBFgnosia) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rbgnosia@ltf.ufpb.br |
_version_ |
1752122470102466560 |