Headspace analysis and characterisation of South African propolis volatile compounds using GCxGC–ToF–MS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-695X2019000300351 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Propolis also known as "bee glue or bee resin" is a resinous mixture of bee saliva or bee wax and exudate from tree trunks and flowers, produced by honeybees. The composition of propolis varies depending on the vegetation the bees can access. It is therefore expected that propolis obtained from various localities may have different chemical profiles. In this study, the headspace volatiles of propolis (n = 39) collected from various locations in South Africa (Gauteng, Northern Cape and Western Cape Provinces) were explored for the first time using GCxGC–ToF–MS. Several GCxGC parameters were optimised including; incubation time, temperature and modulation period. Multivariate data analysis techniques (principal component and hierarchical cluster analyses) were applied on the GCxGC–ToF–MS data to investigate trends and clustering patterns within propolis samples. The results demonstrated that headspace volatiles of propolis varied between locations. The volatile profiles were dominated by monoterpenes such as α-pinene (1.2–46.5%), β-pinene (2.0–21.8%), dihydrosabinene (trace-17.8%), limonene (trace-11.6%), p-cymene (0.1–5.3%), 1,8-cineole (0.1–11.0%), 2,7-dimethyl-3-octen-5-yne (trace-11.7%), E-β-ocimene (trace-17.8%), octanal (trace-12.9%), styrene (trace-13.5%) and α-thujene (trace-11.0%). Principal component analysis revealed chemical variation within propolis from the various locations. The heatmap of the averages revealed dehydrosabinene, isopropentyltoluene, p-cymene, acetophenone and α-thujene as chemical markers for the Northern Cape propolis, while λ-terpinene, propanoic acid, furfural, 2-methoxy benzyl alcohol and hexanoic acid methylester were filtered out as markers for Gauteng propolis. The propolis samples originating from the Western Cape Province were dominated by prenal, cinnamaldehyde styrene, 1,8-cineole, decanal, prenyl acetate and butanoic acid. Using GCxGC–ToF–MS in combination with chemometrics, it was possible to profile headspace volatile constituents of propolis and further identify marker compounds that differentiate propolis from various provinces in South Africa. |
id |
SBFGNOSIA-1_c3e25b95b1ae6baf776e9313281b2e8b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-695X2019000300351 |
network_acronym_str |
SBFGNOSIA-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Headspace analysis and characterisation of South African propolis volatile compounds using GCxGC–ToF–MSGCxGC–ToF–MSHeadspacePropolisChemometricsSouth AfricaABSTRACT Propolis also known as "bee glue or bee resin" is a resinous mixture of bee saliva or bee wax and exudate from tree trunks and flowers, produced by honeybees. The composition of propolis varies depending on the vegetation the bees can access. It is therefore expected that propolis obtained from various localities may have different chemical profiles. In this study, the headspace volatiles of propolis (n = 39) collected from various locations in South Africa (Gauteng, Northern Cape and Western Cape Provinces) were explored for the first time using GCxGC–ToF–MS. Several GCxGC parameters were optimised including; incubation time, temperature and modulation period. Multivariate data analysis techniques (principal component and hierarchical cluster analyses) were applied on the GCxGC–ToF–MS data to investigate trends and clustering patterns within propolis samples. The results demonstrated that headspace volatiles of propolis varied between locations. The volatile profiles were dominated by monoterpenes such as α-pinene (1.2–46.5%), β-pinene (2.0–21.8%), dihydrosabinene (trace-17.8%), limonene (trace-11.6%), p-cymene (0.1–5.3%), 1,8-cineole (0.1–11.0%), 2,7-dimethyl-3-octen-5-yne (trace-11.7%), E-β-ocimene (trace-17.8%), octanal (trace-12.9%), styrene (trace-13.5%) and α-thujene (trace-11.0%). Principal component analysis revealed chemical variation within propolis from the various locations. The heatmap of the averages revealed dehydrosabinene, isopropentyltoluene, p-cymene, acetophenone and α-thujene as chemical markers for the Northern Cape propolis, while λ-terpinene, propanoic acid, furfural, 2-methoxy benzyl alcohol and hexanoic acid methylester were filtered out as markers for Gauteng propolis. The propolis samples originating from the Western Cape Province were dominated by prenal, cinnamaldehyde styrene, 1,8-cineole, decanal, prenyl acetate and butanoic acid. Using GCxGC–ToF–MS in combination with chemometrics, it was possible to profile headspace volatile constituents of propolis and further identify marker compounds that differentiate propolis from various provinces in South Africa.Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia2019-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-695X2019000300351Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia v.29 n.3 2019reponame:Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia (SBFgnosia)instacron:SBFGNOSIA10.1016/j.bjp.2018.12.002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKamatou,GuySandasi,MaxleeneTankeu,SidonieVuuren,Sandy vanViljoen,Alvaroeng2019-08-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-695X2019000300351Revistahttp://www.sbfgnosia.org.br/revista/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprbgnosia@ltf.ufpb.br1981-528X0102-695Xopendoar:2019-08-22T00:00Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia (SBFgnosia)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Headspace analysis and characterisation of South African propolis volatile compounds using GCxGC–ToF–MS |
title |
Headspace analysis and characterisation of South African propolis volatile compounds using GCxGC–ToF–MS |
spellingShingle |
Headspace analysis and characterisation of South African propolis volatile compounds using GCxGC–ToF–MS Kamatou,Guy GCxGC–ToF–MS Headspace Propolis Chemometrics South Africa |
title_short |
Headspace analysis and characterisation of South African propolis volatile compounds using GCxGC–ToF–MS |
title_full |
Headspace analysis and characterisation of South African propolis volatile compounds using GCxGC–ToF–MS |
title_fullStr |
Headspace analysis and characterisation of South African propolis volatile compounds using GCxGC–ToF–MS |
title_full_unstemmed |
Headspace analysis and characterisation of South African propolis volatile compounds using GCxGC–ToF–MS |
title_sort |
Headspace analysis and characterisation of South African propolis volatile compounds using GCxGC–ToF–MS |
author |
Kamatou,Guy |
author_facet |
Kamatou,Guy Sandasi,Maxleene Tankeu,Sidonie Vuuren,Sandy van Viljoen,Alvaro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sandasi,Maxleene Tankeu,Sidonie Vuuren,Sandy van Viljoen,Alvaro |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kamatou,Guy Sandasi,Maxleene Tankeu,Sidonie Vuuren,Sandy van Viljoen,Alvaro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
GCxGC–ToF–MS Headspace Propolis Chemometrics South Africa |
topic |
GCxGC–ToF–MS Headspace Propolis Chemometrics South Africa |
description |
ABSTRACT Propolis also known as "bee glue or bee resin" is a resinous mixture of bee saliva or bee wax and exudate from tree trunks and flowers, produced by honeybees. The composition of propolis varies depending on the vegetation the bees can access. It is therefore expected that propolis obtained from various localities may have different chemical profiles. In this study, the headspace volatiles of propolis (n = 39) collected from various locations in South Africa (Gauteng, Northern Cape and Western Cape Provinces) were explored for the first time using GCxGC–ToF–MS. Several GCxGC parameters were optimised including; incubation time, temperature and modulation period. Multivariate data analysis techniques (principal component and hierarchical cluster analyses) were applied on the GCxGC–ToF–MS data to investigate trends and clustering patterns within propolis samples. The results demonstrated that headspace volatiles of propolis varied between locations. The volatile profiles were dominated by monoterpenes such as α-pinene (1.2–46.5%), β-pinene (2.0–21.8%), dihydrosabinene (trace-17.8%), limonene (trace-11.6%), p-cymene (0.1–5.3%), 1,8-cineole (0.1–11.0%), 2,7-dimethyl-3-octen-5-yne (trace-11.7%), E-β-ocimene (trace-17.8%), octanal (trace-12.9%), styrene (trace-13.5%) and α-thujene (trace-11.0%). Principal component analysis revealed chemical variation within propolis from the various locations. The heatmap of the averages revealed dehydrosabinene, isopropentyltoluene, p-cymene, acetophenone and α-thujene as chemical markers for the Northern Cape propolis, while λ-terpinene, propanoic acid, furfural, 2-methoxy benzyl alcohol and hexanoic acid methylester were filtered out as markers for Gauteng propolis. The propolis samples originating from the Western Cape Province were dominated by prenal, cinnamaldehyde styrene, 1,8-cineole, decanal, prenyl acetate and butanoic acid. Using GCxGC–ToF–MS in combination with chemometrics, it was possible to profile headspace volatile constituents of propolis and further identify marker compounds that differentiate propolis from various provinces in South Africa. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-695X2019000300351 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-695X2019000300351 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1016/j.bjp.2018.12.002 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia v.29 n.3 2019 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia (SBFgnosia) instacron:SBFGNOSIA |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia (SBFgnosia) |
instacron_str |
SBFGNOSIA |
institution |
SBFGNOSIA |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia (SBFgnosia) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rbgnosia@ltf.ufpb.br |
_version_ |
1752122471156285440 |