Headspace analysis and characterisation of South African propolis volatile compounds using GCxGC–ToF–MS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kamatou,Guy
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Sandasi,Maxleene, Tankeu,Sidonie, Vuuren,Sandy van, Viljoen,Alvaro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-695X2019000300351
Resumo: ABSTRACT Propolis also known as "bee glue or bee resin" is a resinous mixture of bee saliva or bee wax and exudate from tree trunks and flowers, produced by honeybees. The composition of propolis varies depending on the vegetation the bees can access. It is therefore expected that propolis obtained from various localities may have different chemical profiles. In this study, the headspace volatiles of propolis (n = 39) collected from various locations in South Africa (Gauteng, Northern Cape and Western Cape Provinces) were explored for the first time using GCxGC–ToF–MS. Several GCxGC parameters were optimised including; incubation time, temperature and modulation period. Multivariate data analysis techniques (principal component and hierarchical cluster analyses) were applied on the GCxGC–ToF–MS data to investigate trends and clustering patterns within propolis samples. The results demonstrated that headspace volatiles of propolis varied between locations. The volatile profiles were dominated by monoterpenes such as α-pinene (1.2–46.5%), β-pinene (2.0–21.8%), dihydrosabinene (trace-17.8%), limonene (trace-11.6%), p-cymene (0.1–5.3%), 1,8-cineole (0.1–11.0%), 2,7-dimethyl-3-octen-5-yne (trace-11.7%), E-β-ocimene (trace-17.8%), octanal (trace-12.9%), styrene (trace-13.5%) and α-thujene (trace-11.0%). Principal component analysis revealed chemical variation within propolis from the various locations. The heatmap of the averages revealed dehydrosabinene, isopropentyltoluene, p-cymene, acetophenone and α-thujene as chemical markers for the Northern Cape propolis, while λ-terpinene, propanoic acid, furfural, 2-methoxy benzyl alcohol and hexanoic acid methylester were filtered out as markers for Gauteng propolis. The propolis samples originating from the Western Cape Province were dominated by prenal, cinnamaldehyde styrene, 1,8-cineole, decanal, prenyl acetate and butanoic acid. Using GCxGC–ToF–MS in combination with chemometrics, it was possible to profile headspace volatile constituents of propolis and further identify marker compounds that differentiate propolis from various provinces in South Africa.
id SBFGNOSIA-1_c3e25b95b1ae6baf776e9313281b2e8b
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-695X2019000300351
network_acronym_str SBFGNOSIA-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Headspace analysis and characterisation of South African propolis volatile compounds using GCxGC–ToF–MSGCxGC–ToF–MSHeadspacePropolisChemometricsSouth AfricaABSTRACT Propolis also known as "bee glue or bee resin" is a resinous mixture of bee saliva or bee wax and exudate from tree trunks and flowers, produced by honeybees. The composition of propolis varies depending on the vegetation the bees can access. It is therefore expected that propolis obtained from various localities may have different chemical profiles. In this study, the headspace volatiles of propolis (n = 39) collected from various locations in South Africa (Gauteng, Northern Cape and Western Cape Provinces) were explored for the first time using GCxGC–ToF–MS. Several GCxGC parameters were optimised including; incubation time, temperature and modulation period. Multivariate data analysis techniques (principal component and hierarchical cluster analyses) were applied on the GCxGC–ToF–MS data to investigate trends and clustering patterns within propolis samples. The results demonstrated that headspace volatiles of propolis varied between locations. The volatile profiles were dominated by monoterpenes such as α-pinene (1.2–46.5%), β-pinene (2.0–21.8%), dihydrosabinene (trace-17.8%), limonene (trace-11.6%), p-cymene (0.1–5.3%), 1,8-cineole (0.1–11.0%), 2,7-dimethyl-3-octen-5-yne (trace-11.7%), E-β-ocimene (trace-17.8%), octanal (trace-12.9%), styrene (trace-13.5%) and α-thujene (trace-11.0%). Principal component analysis revealed chemical variation within propolis from the various locations. The heatmap of the averages revealed dehydrosabinene, isopropentyltoluene, p-cymene, acetophenone and α-thujene as chemical markers for the Northern Cape propolis, while λ-terpinene, propanoic acid, furfural, 2-methoxy benzyl alcohol and hexanoic acid methylester were filtered out as markers for Gauteng propolis. The propolis samples originating from the Western Cape Province were dominated by prenal, cinnamaldehyde styrene, 1,8-cineole, decanal, prenyl acetate and butanoic acid. Using GCxGC–ToF–MS in combination with chemometrics, it was possible to profile headspace volatile constituents of propolis and further identify marker compounds that differentiate propolis from various provinces in South Africa.Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia2019-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-695X2019000300351Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia v.29 n.3 2019reponame:Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia (SBFgnosia)instacron:SBFGNOSIA10.1016/j.bjp.2018.12.002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKamatou,GuySandasi,MaxleeneTankeu,SidonieVuuren,Sandy vanViljoen,Alvaroeng2019-08-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-695X2019000300351Revistahttp://www.sbfgnosia.org.br/revista/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprbgnosia@ltf.ufpb.br1981-528X0102-695Xopendoar:2019-08-22T00:00Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia (SBFgnosia)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Headspace analysis and characterisation of South African propolis volatile compounds using GCxGC–ToF–MS
title Headspace analysis and characterisation of South African propolis volatile compounds using GCxGC–ToF–MS
spellingShingle Headspace analysis and characterisation of South African propolis volatile compounds using GCxGC–ToF–MS
Kamatou,Guy
GCxGC–ToF–MS
Headspace
Propolis
Chemometrics
South Africa
title_short Headspace analysis and characterisation of South African propolis volatile compounds using GCxGC–ToF–MS
title_full Headspace analysis and characterisation of South African propolis volatile compounds using GCxGC–ToF–MS
title_fullStr Headspace analysis and characterisation of South African propolis volatile compounds using GCxGC–ToF–MS
title_full_unstemmed Headspace analysis and characterisation of South African propolis volatile compounds using GCxGC–ToF–MS
title_sort Headspace analysis and characterisation of South African propolis volatile compounds using GCxGC–ToF–MS
author Kamatou,Guy
author_facet Kamatou,Guy
Sandasi,Maxleene
Tankeu,Sidonie
Vuuren,Sandy van
Viljoen,Alvaro
author_role author
author2 Sandasi,Maxleene
Tankeu,Sidonie
Vuuren,Sandy van
Viljoen,Alvaro
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kamatou,Guy
Sandasi,Maxleene
Tankeu,Sidonie
Vuuren,Sandy van
Viljoen,Alvaro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv GCxGC–ToF–MS
Headspace
Propolis
Chemometrics
South Africa
topic GCxGC–ToF–MS
Headspace
Propolis
Chemometrics
South Africa
description ABSTRACT Propolis also known as "bee glue or bee resin" is a resinous mixture of bee saliva or bee wax and exudate from tree trunks and flowers, produced by honeybees. The composition of propolis varies depending on the vegetation the bees can access. It is therefore expected that propolis obtained from various localities may have different chemical profiles. In this study, the headspace volatiles of propolis (n = 39) collected from various locations in South Africa (Gauteng, Northern Cape and Western Cape Provinces) were explored for the first time using GCxGC–ToF–MS. Several GCxGC parameters were optimised including; incubation time, temperature and modulation period. Multivariate data analysis techniques (principal component and hierarchical cluster analyses) were applied on the GCxGC–ToF–MS data to investigate trends and clustering patterns within propolis samples. The results demonstrated that headspace volatiles of propolis varied between locations. The volatile profiles were dominated by monoterpenes such as α-pinene (1.2–46.5%), β-pinene (2.0–21.8%), dihydrosabinene (trace-17.8%), limonene (trace-11.6%), p-cymene (0.1–5.3%), 1,8-cineole (0.1–11.0%), 2,7-dimethyl-3-octen-5-yne (trace-11.7%), E-β-ocimene (trace-17.8%), octanal (trace-12.9%), styrene (trace-13.5%) and α-thujene (trace-11.0%). Principal component analysis revealed chemical variation within propolis from the various locations. The heatmap of the averages revealed dehydrosabinene, isopropentyltoluene, p-cymene, acetophenone and α-thujene as chemical markers for the Northern Cape propolis, while λ-terpinene, propanoic acid, furfural, 2-methoxy benzyl alcohol and hexanoic acid methylester were filtered out as markers for Gauteng propolis. The propolis samples originating from the Western Cape Province were dominated by prenal, cinnamaldehyde styrene, 1,8-cineole, decanal, prenyl acetate and butanoic acid. Using GCxGC–ToF–MS in combination with chemometrics, it was possible to profile headspace volatile constituents of propolis and further identify marker compounds that differentiate propolis from various provinces in South Africa.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-695X2019000300351
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-695X2019000300351
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjp.2018.12.002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia v.29 n.3 2019
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia (SBFgnosia)
instacron:SBFGNOSIA
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia (SBFgnosia)
instacron_str SBFGNOSIA
institution SBFGNOSIA
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia (SBFgnosia)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbgnosia@ltf.ufpb.br
_version_ 1752122471156285440