Mites fluctuation population on peach tree (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) and in associated plants

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Eichelberger,Carla Rosana
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Johann,Liana, Majolo,Fernanda, Ferla,Noeli Juarez
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452011000300010
Resumo: Despite the importance of peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) in Rio Grande do Sul, little is known about mites fluctuation population considered important to this crop. The objective of this study was to know the population diversity and fluctuation of mite species associated with Premier and Eldorado varieties in Roca Sales and Venâncio Aires counties, Rio Grande do Sul. The study was conducted from July 2008 to June 2009 when 15 plants were randomly chosen in each area. The plants were divided in quadrants and from each one a branch was chosen from which three leaves were removed: one collected in the apical region, another in the medium and the other in the basal region, totalizing 180 leaves/area. Five of the most abundant associated plants were collected monthly in enough amounts for the screening under the stereoscopic microscope during an hour. A total of 1,124 mites were found belonging to 14 families and 28 species. Tetranychus ludeni Zacher, 1913, Panonychus ulmi (Koch, 1836) and Mononychellus planki (McGregor, 1950) were the most abundant phytophagous mites, whereas Typhlodromalus aripo Deleon, 1967 and Phytoseiulus macropilis (Banks, 1904) the most common predatory mites. The period of one hour under stereoscopic microscope was enough to get a representative sample. In both places evaluated the ecologic indices were low, but little higherin Premier (H' 0.56; EqJ: 0.43) when compared to Eldorado (H' 0.53; EqJ 0.40). In Premier constant species were not observed and accessory only Brevipalpus phoenicis (Geijskes, 1939), T. ludeni and T. aripo. Higher abundance was observed in December and January and bigger amount in April. Already in Eldorado, T. ludeni and P. ulmi were constants. Greater abundance was observed in November and December, whereas grater richness in December and January. In both orchards were not found mites in buds. Tetranychus ludeni is the most abundant phytophagous mites with outbreak population in November, December and January and high predator diversity was observed on associated plants and on peach plants, indicating the existence of species mobility in peach orchard.
id SBFRU-1_038f042249975ed3c74181c8ea674c56
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-29452011000300010
network_acronym_str SBFRU-1
network_name_str Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Mites fluctuation population on peach tree (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) and in associated plantsAcaribiological controlPanonychus ulmiTetranychus ludeniTyphlodromalus aripoDespite the importance of peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) in Rio Grande do Sul, little is known about mites fluctuation population considered important to this crop. The objective of this study was to know the population diversity and fluctuation of mite species associated with Premier and Eldorado varieties in Roca Sales and Venâncio Aires counties, Rio Grande do Sul. The study was conducted from July 2008 to June 2009 when 15 plants were randomly chosen in each area. The plants were divided in quadrants and from each one a branch was chosen from which three leaves were removed: one collected in the apical region, another in the medium and the other in the basal region, totalizing 180 leaves/area. Five of the most abundant associated plants were collected monthly in enough amounts for the screening under the stereoscopic microscope during an hour. A total of 1,124 mites were found belonging to 14 families and 28 species. Tetranychus ludeni Zacher, 1913, Panonychus ulmi (Koch, 1836) and Mononychellus planki (McGregor, 1950) were the most abundant phytophagous mites, whereas Typhlodromalus aripo Deleon, 1967 and Phytoseiulus macropilis (Banks, 1904) the most common predatory mites. The period of one hour under stereoscopic microscope was enough to get a representative sample. In both places evaluated the ecologic indices were low, but little higherin Premier (H' 0.56; EqJ: 0.43) when compared to Eldorado (H' 0.53; EqJ 0.40). In Premier constant species were not observed and accessory only Brevipalpus phoenicis (Geijskes, 1939), T. ludeni and T. aripo. Higher abundance was observed in December and January and bigger amount in April. Already in Eldorado, T. ludeni and P. ulmi were constants. Greater abundance was observed in November and December, whereas grater richness in December and January. In both orchards were not found mites in buds. Tetranychus ludeni is the most abundant phytophagous mites with outbreak population in November, December and January and high predator diversity was observed on associated plants and on peach plants, indicating the existence of species mobility in peach orchard.Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura2011-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452011000300010Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura v.33 n.3 2011reponame:Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)instacron:SBFRU10.1590/S0100-29452011005000102info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEichelberger,Carla RosanaJohann,LianaMajolo,FernandaFerla,Noeli Juarezeng2012-01-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-29452011000300010Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbfhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprbf@fcav.unesp.br||http://rbf.org.br/1806-99670100-2945opendoar:2012-01-12T00:00Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mites fluctuation population on peach tree (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) and in associated plants
title Mites fluctuation population on peach tree (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) and in associated plants
spellingShingle Mites fluctuation population on peach tree (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) and in associated plants
Eichelberger,Carla Rosana
Acari
biological control
Panonychus ulmi
Tetranychus ludeni
Typhlodromalus aripo
title_short Mites fluctuation population on peach tree (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) and in associated plants
title_full Mites fluctuation population on peach tree (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) and in associated plants
title_fullStr Mites fluctuation population on peach tree (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) and in associated plants
title_full_unstemmed Mites fluctuation population on peach tree (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) and in associated plants
title_sort Mites fluctuation population on peach tree (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) and in associated plants
author Eichelberger,Carla Rosana
author_facet Eichelberger,Carla Rosana
Johann,Liana
Majolo,Fernanda
Ferla,Noeli Juarez
author_role author
author2 Johann,Liana
Majolo,Fernanda
Ferla,Noeli Juarez
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Eichelberger,Carla Rosana
Johann,Liana
Majolo,Fernanda
Ferla,Noeli Juarez
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Acari
biological control
Panonychus ulmi
Tetranychus ludeni
Typhlodromalus aripo
topic Acari
biological control
Panonychus ulmi
Tetranychus ludeni
Typhlodromalus aripo
description Despite the importance of peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) in Rio Grande do Sul, little is known about mites fluctuation population considered important to this crop. The objective of this study was to know the population diversity and fluctuation of mite species associated with Premier and Eldorado varieties in Roca Sales and Venâncio Aires counties, Rio Grande do Sul. The study was conducted from July 2008 to June 2009 when 15 plants were randomly chosen in each area. The plants were divided in quadrants and from each one a branch was chosen from which three leaves were removed: one collected in the apical region, another in the medium and the other in the basal region, totalizing 180 leaves/area. Five of the most abundant associated plants were collected monthly in enough amounts for the screening under the stereoscopic microscope during an hour. A total of 1,124 mites were found belonging to 14 families and 28 species. Tetranychus ludeni Zacher, 1913, Panonychus ulmi (Koch, 1836) and Mononychellus planki (McGregor, 1950) were the most abundant phytophagous mites, whereas Typhlodromalus aripo Deleon, 1967 and Phytoseiulus macropilis (Banks, 1904) the most common predatory mites. The period of one hour under stereoscopic microscope was enough to get a representative sample. In both places evaluated the ecologic indices were low, but little higherin Premier (H' 0.56; EqJ: 0.43) when compared to Eldorado (H' 0.53; EqJ 0.40). In Premier constant species were not observed and accessory only Brevipalpus phoenicis (Geijskes, 1939), T. ludeni and T. aripo. Higher abundance was observed in December and January and bigger amount in April. Already in Eldorado, T. ludeni and P. ulmi were constants. Greater abundance was observed in November and December, whereas grater richness in December and January. In both orchards were not found mites in buds. Tetranychus ludeni is the most abundant phytophagous mites with outbreak population in November, December and January and high predator diversity was observed on associated plants and on peach plants, indicating the existence of species mobility in peach orchard.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452011000300010
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452011000300010
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0100-29452011005000102
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura v.33 n.3 2011
reponame:Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)
instacron:SBFRU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)
instacron_str SBFRU
institution SBFRU
reponame_str Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
collection Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbf@fcav.unesp.br||http://rbf.org.br/
_version_ 1752122490578010112