How to drive phloem gene expression? A case study with preferentially expressed citrus gene promoters

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bezerra,Yane Caroline dos Anjos
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Marques,João Paulo Rodrigues, Stipp,Liliane Cristina Liborio, Attílio,Lísia Borges, Freitas-Astúa,Juliana, Mourão Filho,Francisco de Assis Alves
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452021000400801
Resumo: Abstract New approaches for developing disease-resistant genetically modified organisms have included specific targets for gene expression to enhance the chances for pathogen control. Gene expression driven by phloem-derived Citrus sinensis gene promoters could be evaluated and compared with the expression induced by a strong constitutive promoter in the same tissue, leading to the production of transgenic sweet oranges potentially more resistant to diseases caused by phloem-limited bacteria. ‘Carrizo’ citrange [ (Poncirus trifoliataL.) Raf. x Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck] was transformed, via Agrobacterium tumefaciens, with the binary vector pCAMBIA2301 bearing the uidA gene (ß-glucuronidase) driven by the CaMV35S constitutive promoter (CaMV35S::uidA) or by the CsPP2.B1 (CsPP2.B1::uidA) or by the CsVTE2 (CsVTE2::uidA) citrus promoters. In vitro regenerated shoots were grafted onto ‘Rangpur’ lime (C. limonia Osbeck). The genetic transformation was confirmed by Southern blot analyses. uidA gene expression was evaluated by RT-qPCR, and gene histolocalization controlled by these three promoters was accessed by X-GLUC treated stem sections. uidA gene expression exhibited by tissue-specific promoters was overall lower than from the constitutive promoter CaMV35; however, constructs driven by tissue-specific promoters may lead to expression in restricted tissues. CsPP2.B1 and CsVTE2 promoters can be considered adequate for the utilization in gene constructs aiming disease resistance.
id SBFRU-1_06ca0603d9dc8f4a961479aea8b10cbd
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-29452021000400801
network_acronym_str SBFRU-1
network_name_str Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling How to drive phloem gene expression? A case study with preferentially expressed citrus gene promotersCandidatus Liberibacter spp.disease resistancegenetic transformationGUShistolocalizationAbstract New approaches for developing disease-resistant genetically modified organisms have included specific targets for gene expression to enhance the chances for pathogen control. Gene expression driven by phloem-derived Citrus sinensis gene promoters could be evaluated and compared with the expression induced by a strong constitutive promoter in the same tissue, leading to the production of transgenic sweet oranges potentially more resistant to diseases caused by phloem-limited bacteria. ‘Carrizo’ citrange [ (Poncirus trifoliataL.) Raf. x Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck] was transformed, via Agrobacterium tumefaciens, with the binary vector pCAMBIA2301 bearing the uidA gene (ß-glucuronidase) driven by the CaMV35S constitutive promoter (CaMV35S::uidA) or by the CsPP2.B1 (CsPP2.B1::uidA) or by the CsVTE2 (CsVTE2::uidA) citrus promoters. In vitro regenerated shoots were grafted onto ‘Rangpur’ lime (C. limonia Osbeck). The genetic transformation was confirmed by Southern blot analyses. uidA gene expression was evaluated by RT-qPCR, and gene histolocalization controlled by these three promoters was accessed by X-GLUC treated stem sections. uidA gene expression exhibited by tissue-specific promoters was overall lower than from the constitutive promoter CaMV35; however, constructs driven by tissue-specific promoters may lead to expression in restricted tissues. CsPP2.B1 and CsVTE2 promoters can be considered adequate for the utilization in gene constructs aiming disease resistance.Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452021000400801Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura v.43 n.4 2021reponame:Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)instacron:SBFRU10.1590/0100-29452021005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBezerra,Yane Caroline dos AnjosMarques,João Paulo RodriguesStipp,Liliane Cristina LiborioAttílio,Lísia BorgesFreitas-Astúa,JulianaMourão Filho,Francisco de Assis Alveseng2021-07-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-29452021000400801Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbfhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprbf@fcav.unesp.br||http://rbf.org.br/1806-99670100-2945opendoar:2021-07-20T00:00Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv How to drive phloem gene expression? A case study with preferentially expressed citrus gene promoters
title How to drive phloem gene expression? A case study with preferentially expressed citrus gene promoters
spellingShingle How to drive phloem gene expression? A case study with preferentially expressed citrus gene promoters
Bezerra,Yane Caroline dos Anjos
Candidatus Liberibacter spp.
disease resistance
genetic transformation
GUS
histolocalization
title_short How to drive phloem gene expression? A case study with preferentially expressed citrus gene promoters
title_full How to drive phloem gene expression? A case study with preferentially expressed citrus gene promoters
title_fullStr How to drive phloem gene expression? A case study with preferentially expressed citrus gene promoters
title_full_unstemmed How to drive phloem gene expression? A case study with preferentially expressed citrus gene promoters
title_sort How to drive phloem gene expression? A case study with preferentially expressed citrus gene promoters
author Bezerra,Yane Caroline dos Anjos
author_facet Bezerra,Yane Caroline dos Anjos
Marques,João Paulo Rodrigues
Stipp,Liliane Cristina Liborio
Attílio,Lísia Borges
Freitas-Astúa,Juliana
Mourão Filho,Francisco de Assis Alves
author_role author
author2 Marques,João Paulo Rodrigues
Stipp,Liliane Cristina Liborio
Attílio,Lísia Borges
Freitas-Astúa,Juliana
Mourão Filho,Francisco de Assis Alves
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bezerra,Yane Caroline dos Anjos
Marques,João Paulo Rodrigues
Stipp,Liliane Cristina Liborio
Attílio,Lísia Borges
Freitas-Astúa,Juliana
Mourão Filho,Francisco de Assis Alves
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Candidatus Liberibacter spp.
disease resistance
genetic transformation
GUS
histolocalization
topic Candidatus Liberibacter spp.
disease resistance
genetic transformation
GUS
histolocalization
description Abstract New approaches for developing disease-resistant genetically modified organisms have included specific targets for gene expression to enhance the chances for pathogen control. Gene expression driven by phloem-derived Citrus sinensis gene promoters could be evaluated and compared with the expression induced by a strong constitutive promoter in the same tissue, leading to the production of transgenic sweet oranges potentially more resistant to diseases caused by phloem-limited bacteria. ‘Carrizo’ citrange [ (Poncirus trifoliataL.) Raf. x Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck] was transformed, via Agrobacterium tumefaciens, with the binary vector pCAMBIA2301 bearing the uidA gene (ß-glucuronidase) driven by the CaMV35S constitutive promoter (CaMV35S::uidA) or by the CsPP2.B1 (CsPP2.B1::uidA) or by the CsVTE2 (CsVTE2::uidA) citrus promoters. In vitro regenerated shoots were grafted onto ‘Rangpur’ lime (C. limonia Osbeck). The genetic transformation was confirmed by Southern blot analyses. uidA gene expression was evaluated by RT-qPCR, and gene histolocalization controlled by these three promoters was accessed by X-GLUC treated stem sections. uidA gene expression exhibited by tissue-specific promoters was overall lower than from the constitutive promoter CaMV35; however, constructs driven by tissue-specific promoters may lead to expression in restricted tissues. CsPP2.B1 and CsVTE2 promoters can be considered adequate for the utilization in gene constructs aiming disease resistance.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452021000400801
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452021000400801
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0100-29452021005
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura v.43 n.4 2021
reponame:Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)
instacron:SBFRU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)
instacron_str SBFRU
institution SBFRU
reponame_str Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
collection Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbf@fcav.unesp.br||http://rbf.org.br/
_version_ 1752122496543358976