Rootstock-scion interaction:3. Effect on the composition of Cabernet Sauvignon wine

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Miele,Alberto
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Rizzon,Luiz Antenor
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452019000101004
Resumo: Abstract The interaction among rootstock, scion and environment may induce different responses to the grapevine physiology and consequently to the grape and wine composition. The vineyards of Serra Gaúcha, Brazil, are established in soils that may have different physicochemical attributes. Furthermore, the grapevines are grafted on a wide diversity of rootstocks. Therefore, this study aimed to determine their effect on the wine composition of the Cabernet Sauvignon (CS) grafted on Rupestris du Lot, 101-14 Mgt, 3309 C, 420A Mgt, 5BB K, 161-49 C, SO4, Solferino, 1103 P, 99 R, 110 R, Gravesac, Fercal, Dogridge and Isabel, featuring some genetic diversity altogether. The experimental design was in randomized blocks, with 15 treatments, three replicates and 10 vines per plot. The grapes were harvested at maturity for three years, and then wines were made in glass recipients of 20 L. When alcoholic and malolactic fermentations were over, the wine analyses were performed on twenty-five variables related to alcohol, acidity, dry extract, polyphenols and volatile compounds. The main results show that all variables were affected year by year, some of them by the rootstock and a few by the interaction between rootstock and year. The rootstock effect was observed mainly on variables related to alcohol, acidity and ashes. Results show that the CS/101-14 Mgt wine had higher alcohol content than CS/Dogridge and CS/Isabel wines, which was probably due to the 101-14 Mgt rootstock favoring an early grape ripening. However, higher pH values were observed in the CS/Rupestris du Lot, CS/5BB K and CS/Gravesac than CS/420A Mgt, CS/110 R and CS/Isabel wines. These results show that there is a diversity of rootstocks that can be used by the growers due to the Cabernet Sauvignon wine composition similarities.
id SBFRU-1_104fc35253ec51d60dc716174955b61d
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-29452019000101004
network_acronym_str SBFRU-1
network_name_str Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Rootstock-scion interaction:3. Effect on the composition of Cabernet Sauvignon wineVitis viniferagrapevinephenolic compoundsvolatile substancesAbstract The interaction among rootstock, scion and environment may induce different responses to the grapevine physiology and consequently to the grape and wine composition. The vineyards of Serra Gaúcha, Brazil, are established in soils that may have different physicochemical attributes. Furthermore, the grapevines are grafted on a wide diversity of rootstocks. Therefore, this study aimed to determine their effect on the wine composition of the Cabernet Sauvignon (CS) grafted on Rupestris du Lot, 101-14 Mgt, 3309 C, 420A Mgt, 5BB K, 161-49 C, SO4, Solferino, 1103 P, 99 R, 110 R, Gravesac, Fercal, Dogridge and Isabel, featuring some genetic diversity altogether. The experimental design was in randomized blocks, with 15 treatments, three replicates and 10 vines per plot. The grapes were harvested at maturity for three years, and then wines were made in glass recipients of 20 L. When alcoholic and malolactic fermentations were over, the wine analyses were performed on twenty-five variables related to alcohol, acidity, dry extract, polyphenols and volatile compounds. The main results show that all variables were affected year by year, some of them by the rootstock and a few by the interaction between rootstock and year. The rootstock effect was observed mainly on variables related to alcohol, acidity and ashes. Results show that the CS/101-14 Mgt wine had higher alcohol content than CS/Dogridge and CS/Isabel wines, which was probably due to the 101-14 Mgt rootstock favoring an early grape ripening. However, higher pH values were observed in the CS/Rupestris du Lot, CS/5BB K and CS/Gravesac than CS/420A Mgt, CS/110 R and CS/Isabel wines. These results show that there is a diversity of rootstocks that can be used by the growers due to the Cabernet Sauvignon wine composition similarities.Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452019000101004Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura v.41 n.1 2019reponame:Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)instacron:SBFRU10.1590/0100-29452019642info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMiele,AlbertoRizzon,Luiz Antenoreng2019-05-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-29452019000101004Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbfhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprbf@fcav.unesp.br||http://rbf.org.br/1806-99670100-2945opendoar:2019-05-15T00:00Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Rootstock-scion interaction:3. Effect on the composition of Cabernet Sauvignon wine
title Rootstock-scion interaction:3. Effect on the composition of Cabernet Sauvignon wine
spellingShingle Rootstock-scion interaction:3. Effect on the composition of Cabernet Sauvignon wine
Miele,Alberto
Vitis vinifera
grapevine
phenolic compounds
volatile substances
title_short Rootstock-scion interaction:3. Effect on the composition of Cabernet Sauvignon wine
title_full Rootstock-scion interaction:3. Effect on the composition of Cabernet Sauvignon wine
title_fullStr Rootstock-scion interaction:3. Effect on the composition of Cabernet Sauvignon wine
title_full_unstemmed Rootstock-scion interaction:3. Effect on the composition of Cabernet Sauvignon wine
title_sort Rootstock-scion interaction:3. Effect on the composition of Cabernet Sauvignon wine
author Miele,Alberto
author_facet Miele,Alberto
Rizzon,Luiz Antenor
author_role author
author2 Rizzon,Luiz Antenor
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Miele,Alberto
Rizzon,Luiz Antenor
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Vitis vinifera
grapevine
phenolic compounds
volatile substances
topic Vitis vinifera
grapevine
phenolic compounds
volatile substances
description Abstract The interaction among rootstock, scion and environment may induce different responses to the grapevine physiology and consequently to the grape and wine composition. The vineyards of Serra Gaúcha, Brazil, are established in soils that may have different physicochemical attributes. Furthermore, the grapevines are grafted on a wide diversity of rootstocks. Therefore, this study aimed to determine their effect on the wine composition of the Cabernet Sauvignon (CS) grafted on Rupestris du Lot, 101-14 Mgt, 3309 C, 420A Mgt, 5BB K, 161-49 C, SO4, Solferino, 1103 P, 99 R, 110 R, Gravesac, Fercal, Dogridge and Isabel, featuring some genetic diversity altogether. The experimental design was in randomized blocks, with 15 treatments, three replicates and 10 vines per plot. The grapes were harvested at maturity for three years, and then wines were made in glass recipients of 20 L. When alcoholic and malolactic fermentations were over, the wine analyses were performed on twenty-five variables related to alcohol, acidity, dry extract, polyphenols and volatile compounds. The main results show that all variables were affected year by year, some of them by the rootstock and a few by the interaction between rootstock and year. The rootstock effect was observed mainly on variables related to alcohol, acidity and ashes. Results show that the CS/101-14 Mgt wine had higher alcohol content than CS/Dogridge and CS/Isabel wines, which was probably due to the 101-14 Mgt rootstock favoring an early grape ripening. However, higher pH values were observed in the CS/Rupestris du Lot, CS/5BB K and CS/Gravesac than CS/420A Mgt, CS/110 R and CS/Isabel wines. These results show that there is a diversity of rootstocks that can be used by the growers due to the Cabernet Sauvignon wine composition similarities.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452019000101004
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452019000101004
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0100-29452019642
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura v.41 n.1 2019
reponame:Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)
instacron:SBFRU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)
instacron_str SBFRU
institution SBFRU
reponame_str Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
collection Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbf@fcav.unesp.br||http://rbf.org.br/
_version_ 1752122495501074432