DISEASES INCIDENCE AND FUNGICIDE COST REDUCTION WITH OVERHEAD COVERED GRAPES

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: ALMANÇA,MARCUS ANDRÉ KURTZ
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: FRIGHETTO,NATÁLIA SARTORI, TONELLO,JÚLIO CÉSAR, LERIN,SABRINA
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452017000400402
Resumo: ABSTRACT An alternative to control diseases on the grapevine is the use of plastic overhead cover. The cost of developing a vineyard is a relevant factor in the use of plastic overhead cover and will be directly linked to the cost of pest control. The aim of this study was to establish criteria for the use of fungicides in vine plants with plastic overhead cover compared to conventional farming in order to reduce the number and cost of application. The experiment was conducted in the 2010/2011 crop year in Viamão - RS, using the Cabernet Sauvignon cultivar grafted on Paulsen 1103 in “Y Shape” trained, with 1.80 x 2.50 m spacing. The following treatments were evaluated: Treatment 1: plastic overhead cover: phytosanitary treatment applied when leaf wetting was observed; Treatment 2: plastic overhead cover: curative treatment, when there were symptoms of disease in shoots; Treatment 3: plastic overhead cover: conventional calendar treatment every 15 days, with reapplication after leaf wetting and Treatment 4: without plastic overhead cover: conventional calendar treatment every 15 days, with reapplication after leaf wetting. The lowest number of applications was observed in treatment where the criteria for fungicide applications was only when symptoms were visualized and the greater number of applications was in the area without plastic overhead cover with conventional treatment, affecting the application cost, but without reflecting in higher productivity. The highest incidence of downy mildew was observed in treatment 4. It was concluded that it is possible to reduce the number of applications and the fungicide cost for disease control using plastic overhead cover. Moreover, this management may provide less contact with chemicals during crop and reduce chemical wastes in the environment and in the harvested product.
id SBFRU-1_7765eb4a91fed1e8cf06a433b87ac77c
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-29452017000400402
network_acronym_str SBFRU-1
network_name_str Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling DISEASES INCIDENCE AND FUNGICIDE COST REDUCTION WITH OVERHEAD COVERED GRAPESPlasticultureVitis viniferafungal diseasesABSTRACT An alternative to control diseases on the grapevine is the use of plastic overhead cover. The cost of developing a vineyard is a relevant factor in the use of plastic overhead cover and will be directly linked to the cost of pest control. The aim of this study was to establish criteria for the use of fungicides in vine plants with plastic overhead cover compared to conventional farming in order to reduce the number and cost of application. The experiment was conducted in the 2010/2011 crop year in Viamão - RS, using the Cabernet Sauvignon cultivar grafted on Paulsen 1103 in “Y Shape” trained, with 1.80 x 2.50 m spacing. The following treatments were evaluated: Treatment 1: plastic overhead cover: phytosanitary treatment applied when leaf wetting was observed; Treatment 2: plastic overhead cover: curative treatment, when there were symptoms of disease in shoots; Treatment 3: plastic overhead cover: conventional calendar treatment every 15 days, with reapplication after leaf wetting and Treatment 4: without plastic overhead cover: conventional calendar treatment every 15 days, with reapplication after leaf wetting. The lowest number of applications was observed in treatment where the criteria for fungicide applications was only when symptoms were visualized and the greater number of applications was in the area without plastic overhead cover with conventional treatment, affecting the application cost, but without reflecting in higher productivity. The highest incidence of downy mildew was observed in treatment 4. It was concluded that it is possible to reduce the number of applications and the fungicide cost for disease control using plastic overhead cover. Moreover, this management may provide less contact with chemicals during crop and reduce chemical wastes in the environment and in the harvested product.Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452017000400402Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura v.39 n.4 2017reponame:Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)instacron:SBFRU10.1590/0100-29452017020info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessALMANÇA,MARCUS ANDRÉ KURTZFRIGHETTO,NATÁLIA SARTORITONELLO,JÚLIO CÉSARLERIN,SABRINAeng2017-10-31T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-29452017000400402Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbfhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprbf@fcav.unesp.br||http://rbf.org.br/1806-99670100-2945opendoar:2017-10-31T00:00Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv DISEASES INCIDENCE AND FUNGICIDE COST REDUCTION WITH OVERHEAD COVERED GRAPES
title DISEASES INCIDENCE AND FUNGICIDE COST REDUCTION WITH OVERHEAD COVERED GRAPES
spellingShingle DISEASES INCIDENCE AND FUNGICIDE COST REDUCTION WITH OVERHEAD COVERED GRAPES
ALMANÇA,MARCUS ANDRÉ KURTZ
Plasticulture
Vitis vinifera
fungal diseases
title_short DISEASES INCIDENCE AND FUNGICIDE COST REDUCTION WITH OVERHEAD COVERED GRAPES
title_full DISEASES INCIDENCE AND FUNGICIDE COST REDUCTION WITH OVERHEAD COVERED GRAPES
title_fullStr DISEASES INCIDENCE AND FUNGICIDE COST REDUCTION WITH OVERHEAD COVERED GRAPES
title_full_unstemmed DISEASES INCIDENCE AND FUNGICIDE COST REDUCTION WITH OVERHEAD COVERED GRAPES
title_sort DISEASES INCIDENCE AND FUNGICIDE COST REDUCTION WITH OVERHEAD COVERED GRAPES
author ALMANÇA,MARCUS ANDRÉ KURTZ
author_facet ALMANÇA,MARCUS ANDRÉ KURTZ
FRIGHETTO,NATÁLIA SARTORI
TONELLO,JÚLIO CÉSAR
LERIN,SABRINA
author_role author
author2 FRIGHETTO,NATÁLIA SARTORI
TONELLO,JÚLIO CÉSAR
LERIN,SABRINA
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv ALMANÇA,MARCUS ANDRÉ KURTZ
FRIGHETTO,NATÁLIA SARTORI
TONELLO,JÚLIO CÉSAR
LERIN,SABRINA
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Plasticulture
Vitis vinifera
fungal diseases
topic Plasticulture
Vitis vinifera
fungal diseases
description ABSTRACT An alternative to control diseases on the grapevine is the use of plastic overhead cover. The cost of developing a vineyard is a relevant factor in the use of plastic overhead cover and will be directly linked to the cost of pest control. The aim of this study was to establish criteria for the use of fungicides in vine plants with plastic overhead cover compared to conventional farming in order to reduce the number and cost of application. The experiment was conducted in the 2010/2011 crop year in Viamão - RS, using the Cabernet Sauvignon cultivar grafted on Paulsen 1103 in “Y Shape” trained, with 1.80 x 2.50 m spacing. The following treatments were evaluated: Treatment 1: plastic overhead cover: phytosanitary treatment applied when leaf wetting was observed; Treatment 2: plastic overhead cover: curative treatment, when there were symptoms of disease in shoots; Treatment 3: plastic overhead cover: conventional calendar treatment every 15 days, with reapplication after leaf wetting and Treatment 4: without plastic overhead cover: conventional calendar treatment every 15 days, with reapplication after leaf wetting. The lowest number of applications was observed in treatment where the criteria for fungicide applications was only when symptoms were visualized and the greater number of applications was in the area without plastic overhead cover with conventional treatment, affecting the application cost, but without reflecting in higher productivity. The highest incidence of downy mildew was observed in treatment 4. It was concluded that it is possible to reduce the number of applications and the fungicide cost for disease control using plastic overhead cover. Moreover, this management may provide less contact with chemicals during crop and reduce chemical wastes in the environment and in the harvested product.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452017000400402
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452017000400402
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0100-29452017020
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura v.39 n.4 2017
reponame:Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)
instacron:SBFRU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)
instacron_str SBFRU
institution SBFRU
reponame_str Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
collection Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbf@fcav.unesp.br||http://rbf.org.br/
_version_ 1752122494676893696