Comparison of breeding value prediction for two traits in a Nellore-Angus crossbred population using different Bayesian modeling methodologies
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Genetics and Molecular Biology |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-47572014000500005 |
Resumo: | The objectives of this study were to 1) compare four models for breeding value prediction using genomic or pedigree information and 2) evaluate the impact of fixed effects that account for family structure. Comparisons were made in a Nellore-Angus population comprising F2, F3 and half-siblings to embryo transfer F2 calves with records for overall temperament at weaning (TEMP; n = 769) and Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF; n = 387). After quality control, there were 34,913 whole genome SNP markers remaining. Bayesian methods employed were BayesB ( π = 0.995 or 0.997 for WBSF or TEMP, respectively) and BayesC (π = 0 and π), where π is the ideal proportion of markers not included. Direct genomic values (DGV) from single trait Bayesian analyses were compared to conventional pedigree-based animal model breeding values. Numerically, BayesC procedures (using π) had the highest accuracy of all models for WBSF and TEMP ( ρgg = 0.843 and 0.923, respectively), but BayesB had the least bias (regression of performance on prediction closest to 1, βy,x = 2.886 and 1.755, respectively). Accounting for family structure decreased accuracy and increased bias in prediction of DGV indicating a detrimental impact when used in these prediction methods that simultaneously fit many markers. |
id |
SBG-1_2a3dee1b6be8574903c38419face21f0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1415-47572014000500005 |
network_acronym_str |
SBG-1 |
network_name_str |
Genetics and Molecular Biology |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of breeding value prediction for two traits in a Nellore-Angus crossbred population using different Bayesian modeling methodologiesBayesian inferencecrossbred cattlegenomic predictionmodel comparisonThe objectives of this study were to 1) compare four models for breeding value prediction using genomic or pedigree information and 2) evaluate the impact of fixed effects that account for family structure. Comparisons were made in a Nellore-Angus population comprising F2, F3 and half-siblings to embryo transfer F2 calves with records for overall temperament at weaning (TEMP; n = 769) and Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF; n = 387). After quality control, there were 34,913 whole genome SNP markers remaining. Bayesian methods employed were BayesB ( π = 0.995 or 0.997 for WBSF or TEMP, respectively) and BayesC (π = 0 and π), where π is the ideal proportion of markers not included. Direct genomic values (DGV) from single trait Bayesian analyses were compared to conventional pedigree-based animal model breeding values. Numerically, BayesC procedures (using π) had the highest accuracy of all models for WBSF and TEMP ( ρgg = 0.843 and 0.923, respectively), but BayesB had the least bias (regression of performance on prediction closest to 1, βy,x = 2.886 and 1.755, respectively). Accounting for family structure decreased accuracy and increased bias in prediction of DGV indicating a detrimental impact when used in these prediction methods that simultaneously fit many markers.Sociedade Brasileira de Genética2014-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-47572014000500005Genetics and Molecular Biology v.37 n.4 2014reponame:Genetics and Molecular Biologyinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Genética (SBG)instacron:SBG10.1590/S1415-47572014005000021info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHanna,Lauren L. HulsmanGarrick,Dorian J.Gill,Clare A.Herring,Andy D.Sanders,James O.Riley,David G.eng2014-11-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1415-47572014000500005Revistahttp://www.gmb.org.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||editor@gmb.org.br1678-46851415-4757opendoar:2014-11-27T00:00Genetics and Molecular Biology - Sociedade Brasileira de Genética (SBG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of breeding value prediction for two traits in a Nellore-Angus crossbred population using different Bayesian modeling methodologies |
title |
Comparison of breeding value prediction for two traits in a Nellore-Angus crossbred population using different Bayesian modeling methodologies |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of breeding value prediction for two traits in a Nellore-Angus crossbred population using different Bayesian modeling methodologies Hanna,Lauren L. Hulsman Bayesian inference crossbred cattle genomic prediction model comparison |
title_short |
Comparison of breeding value prediction for two traits in a Nellore-Angus crossbred population using different Bayesian modeling methodologies |
title_full |
Comparison of breeding value prediction for two traits in a Nellore-Angus crossbred population using different Bayesian modeling methodologies |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of breeding value prediction for two traits in a Nellore-Angus crossbred population using different Bayesian modeling methodologies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of breeding value prediction for two traits in a Nellore-Angus crossbred population using different Bayesian modeling methodologies |
title_sort |
Comparison of breeding value prediction for two traits in a Nellore-Angus crossbred population using different Bayesian modeling methodologies |
author |
Hanna,Lauren L. Hulsman |
author_facet |
Hanna,Lauren L. Hulsman Garrick,Dorian J. Gill,Clare A. Herring,Andy D. Sanders,James O. Riley,David G. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Garrick,Dorian J. Gill,Clare A. Herring,Andy D. Sanders,James O. Riley,David G. |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Hanna,Lauren L. Hulsman Garrick,Dorian J. Gill,Clare A. Herring,Andy D. Sanders,James O. Riley,David G. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bayesian inference crossbred cattle genomic prediction model comparison |
topic |
Bayesian inference crossbred cattle genomic prediction model comparison |
description |
The objectives of this study were to 1) compare four models for breeding value prediction using genomic or pedigree information and 2) evaluate the impact of fixed effects that account for family structure. Comparisons were made in a Nellore-Angus population comprising F2, F3 and half-siblings to embryo transfer F2 calves with records for overall temperament at weaning (TEMP; n = 769) and Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF; n = 387). After quality control, there were 34,913 whole genome SNP markers remaining. Bayesian methods employed were BayesB ( π = 0.995 or 0.997 for WBSF or TEMP, respectively) and BayesC (π = 0 and π), where π is the ideal proportion of markers not included. Direct genomic values (DGV) from single trait Bayesian analyses were compared to conventional pedigree-based animal model breeding values. Numerically, BayesC procedures (using π) had the highest accuracy of all models for WBSF and TEMP ( ρgg = 0.843 and 0.923, respectively), but BayesB had the least bias (regression of performance on prediction closest to 1, βy,x = 2.886 and 1.755, respectively). Accounting for family structure decreased accuracy and increased bias in prediction of DGV indicating a detrimental impact when used in these prediction methods that simultaneously fit many markers. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-47572014000500005 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-47572014000500005 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1415-47572014005000021 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Genética |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Genética |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Genetics and Molecular Biology v.37 n.4 2014 reponame:Genetics and Molecular Biology instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Genética (SBG) instacron:SBG |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Genética (SBG) |
instacron_str |
SBG |
institution |
SBG |
reponame_str |
Genetics and Molecular Biology |
collection |
Genetics and Molecular Biology |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Genetics and Molecular Biology - Sociedade Brasileira de Genética (SBG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||editor@gmb.org.br |
_version_ |
1752122386241552384 |