Reprogenetics: preimplantational genetics diagnosis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Genetics and Molecular Biology |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-47572014000200013 |
Resumo: | Preimplantational Genetics Diagnosis (PGD) is requested by geneticists and reproductive specialists. Usually geneticists ask for PGD because one or both members of the couple have an increased genetic risk for having an affected offspring. On the other hand, reproductive specialists ask for embryo aneuploidy screening (PGS) to assures an euploid embryo transfer, with the purpose to achieve an ongoing pregnancy, although the couple have normal karyotypes. As embryonic aneuploidies are responsible for pre and post implantation abortions, it is logical to considerer that the screening of the embryonic aneuploidies prior to embryo transfer could improve the efficiency of the in vitro fertilization procedures. Nevertheless, it is still premature to affirm this until well-designed clinical trials were done, especially in women of advanced age where the rate of embryos with aneuploidies is much greater. Although the indications of PGD are similar to conventional prenatal diagnosis (PND), PGD has less ethical objections than the PND. As with the PGD/PGS results only unaffected embryos are transferred, both methods can avoid the decision to interrupt the pregnancy due to a genetic problem; this makes an important difference when compared to conventional prenatal diagnosis. |
id |
SBG-1_8e7aefabc22e004f5f1058e7fb4a982a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1415-47572014000200013 |
network_acronym_str |
SBG-1 |
network_name_str |
Genetics and Molecular Biology |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Reprogenetics: preimplantational genetics diagnosisPGDPGSPGSSembryo biopsytrophectoderm biopsyPreimplantational Genetics Diagnosis (PGD) is requested by geneticists and reproductive specialists. Usually geneticists ask for PGD because one or both members of the couple have an increased genetic risk for having an affected offspring. On the other hand, reproductive specialists ask for embryo aneuploidy screening (PGS) to assures an euploid embryo transfer, with the purpose to achieve an ongoing pregnancy, although the couple have normal karyotypes. As embryonic aneuploidies are responsible for pre and post implantation abortions, it is logical to considerer that the screening of the embryonic aneuploidies prior to embryo transfer could improve the efficiency of the in vitro fertilization procedures. Nevertheless, it is still premature to affirm this until well-designed clinical trials were done, especially in women of advanced age where the rate of embryos with aneuploidies is much greater. Although the indications of PGD are similar to conventional prenatal diagnosis (PND), PGD has less ethical objections than the PND. As with the PGD/PGS results only unaffected embryos are transferred, both methods can avoid the decision to interrupt the pregnancy due to a genetic problem; this makes an important difference when compared to conventional prenatal diagnosis.Sociedade Brasileira de Genética2014-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-47572014000200013Genetics and Molecular Biology v.37 n.1 suppl.1 2014reponame:Genetics and Molecular Biologyinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Genética (SBG)instacron:SBG10.1590/S1415-47572014000200013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCoco,Robertoeng2014-05-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1415-47572014000200013Revistahttp://www.gmb.org.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||editor@gmb.org.br1678-46851415-4757opendoar:2014-05-21T00:00Genetics and Molecular Biology - Sociedade Brasileira de Genética (SBG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Reprogenetics: preimplantational genetics diagnosis |
title |
Reprogenetics: preimplantational genetics diagnosis |
spellingShingle |
Reprogenetics: preimplantational genetics diagnosis Coco,Roberto PGD PGS PGSS embryo biopsy trophectoderm biopsy |
title_short |
Reprogenetics: preimplantational genetics diagnosis |
title_full |
Reprogenetics: preimplantational genetics diagnosis |
title_fullStr |
Reprogenetics: preimplantational genetics diagnosis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reprogenetics: preimplantational genetics diagnosis |
title_sort |
Reprogenetics: preimplantational genetics diagnosis |
author |
Coco,Roberto |
author_facet |
Coco,Roberto |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Coco,Roberto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
PGD PGS PGSS embryo biopsy trophectoderm biopsy |
topic |
PGD PGS PGSS embryo biopsy trophectoderm biopsy |
description |
Preimplantational Genetics Diagnosis (PGD) is requested by geneticists and reproductive specialists. Usually geneticists ask for PGD because one or both members of the couple have an increased genetic risk for having an affected offspring. On the other hand, reproductive specialists ask for embryo aneuploidy screening (PGS) to assures an euploid embryo transfer, with the purpose to achieve an ongoing pregnancy, although the couple have normal karyotypes. As embryonic aneuploidies are responsible for pre and post implantation abortions, it is logical to considerer that the screening of the embryonic aneuploidies prior to embryo transfer could improve the efficiency of the in vitro fertilization procedures. Nevertheless, it is still premature to affirm this until well-designed clinical trials were done, especially in women of advanced age where the rate of embryos with aneuploidies is much greater. Although the indications of PGD are similar to conventional prenatal diagnosis (PND), PGD has less ethical objections than the PND. As with the PGD/PGS results only unaffected embryos are transferred, both methods can avoid the decision to interrupt the pregnancy due to a genetic problem; this makes an important difference when compared to conventional prenatal diagnosis. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-47572014000200013 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-47572014000200013 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1415-47572014000200013 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Genética |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Genética |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Genetics and Molecular Biology v.37 n.1 suppl.1 2014 reponame:Genetics and Molecular Biology instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Genética (SBG) instacron:SBG |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Genética (SBG) |
instacron_str |
SBG |
institution |
SBG |
reponame_str |
Genetics and Molecular Biology |
collection |
Genetics and Molecular Biology |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Genetics and Molecular Biology - Sociedade Brasileira de Genética (SBG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||editor@gmb.org.br |
_version_ |
1752122385863016448 |