Accretionary models for the Neoproterozoic evolution of the Borborema Province: advances and open questions
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Geology |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-48892021000200301 |
Resumo: | Abstract The current knowledge on the accretionary evolution of the Borborema Province is evaluated considering recently published data and interpretations. Early to late Neoproterozoic eclogite, ophiolite, and magmatic arc remnants have been documented and point to oceanic crust consumption. Isotopic contrasts as well as geophysical anomalies across the major domain boundaries are suggestive of collisional sutures and a speculative model of terrane accretion is presented here. On the other hand, the lack of concise evidence for some of the proposed deep-seated structures as well as putative lithospheric continuity in both sides of it suggest reworking of previously continuous lithosphere through intracontinental deformation in localized sectors of the province interior. It is patent that one model does not preclude the other and available evidence so far has triggered the emergence of conciliatory proposals for the Neoporterozoic history the Borborema Province. |
id |
SBGEO-1_f6b2ca80c9c8953d3e58bda468509cea |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2317-48892021000200301 |
network_acronym_str |
SBGEO-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Geology |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Accretionary models for the Neoproterozoic evolution of the Borborema Province: advances and open questionsaccretion tectonicsNeoproterozoic terrane assemblyBorborema ProvinceAbstract The current knowledge on the accretionary evolution of the Borborema Province is evaluated considering recently published data and interpretations. Early to late Neoproterozoic eclogite, ophiolite, and magmatic arc remnants have been documented and point to oceanic crust consumption. Isotopic contrasts as well as geophysical anomalies across the major domain boundaries are suggestive of collisional sutures and a speculative model of terrane accretion is presented here. On the other hand, the lack of concise evidence for some of the proposed deep-seated structures as well as putative lithospheric continuity in both sides of it suggest reworking of previously continuous lithosphere through intracontinental deformation in localized sectors of the province interior. It is patent that one model does not preclude the other and available evidence so far has triggered the emergence of conciliatory proposals for the Neoporterozoic history the Borborema Province.Sociedade Brasileira de Geologia2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-48892021000200301Brazilian Journal of Geology v.51 n.2 2021reponame:Brazilian Journal of Geologyinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Geologia (SBGEO)instacron:SBGEO10.1590/2317-4889202120200104info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos,Lauro Cézar Montefalco de LiraCaxito,Fabricioeng2021-03-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2317-48892021000200301Revistahttp://bjg.siteoficial.ws/index.htmhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpsbgsede@sbgeo.org.br||claudio.riccomini@gmail.com2317-46922317-4692opendoar:2021-03-09T00:00Brazilian Journal of Geology - Sociedade Brasileira de Geologia (SBGEO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Accretionary models for the Neoproterozoic evolution of the Borborema Province: advances and open questions |
title |
Accretionary models for the Neoproterozoic evolution of the Borborema Province: advances and open questions |
spellingShingle |
Accretionary models for the Neoproterozoic evolution of the Borborema Province: advances and open questions Santos,Lauro Cézar Montefalco de Lira accretion tectonics Neoproterozoic terrane assembly Borborema Province |
title_short |
Accretionary models for the Neoproterozoic evolution of the Borborema Province: advances and open questions |
title_full |
Accretionary models for the Neoproterozoic evolution of the Borborema Province: advances and open questions |
title_fullStr |
Accretionary models for the Neoproterozoic evolution of the Borborema Province: advances and open questions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Accretionary models for the Neoproterozoic evolution of the Borborema Province: advances and open questions |
title_sort |
Accretionary models for the Neoproterozoic evolution of the Borborema Province: advances and open questions |
author |
Santos,Lauro Cézar Montefalco de Lira |
author_facet |
Santos,Lauro Cézar Montefalco de Lira Caxito,Fabricio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Caxito,Fabricio |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos,Lauro Cézar Montefalco de Lira Caxito,Fabricio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
accretion tectonics Neoproterozoic terrane assembly Borborema Province |
topic |
accretion tectonics Neoproterozoic terrane assembly Borborema Province |
description |
Abstract The current knowledge on the accretionary evolution of the Borborema Province is evaluated considering recently published data and interpretations. Early to late Neoproterozoic eclogite, ophiolite, and magmatic arc remnants have been documented and point to oceanic crust consumption. Isotopic contrasts as well as geophysical anomalies across the major domain boundaries are suggestive of collisional sutures and a speculative model of terrane accretion is presented here. On the other hand, the lack of concise evidence for some of the proposed deep-seated structures as well as putative lithospheric continuity in both sides of it suggest reworking of previously continuous lithosphere through intracontinental deformation in localized sectors of the province interior. It is patent that one model does not preclude the other and available evidence so far has triggered the emergence of conciliatory proposals for the Neoporterozoic history the Borborema Province. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-48892021000200301 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-48892021000200301 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/2317-4889202120200104 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Geologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Geologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Geology v.51 n.2 2021 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Geology instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Geologia (SBGEO) instacron:SBGEO |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Geologia (SBGEO) |
instacron_str |
SBGEO |
institution |
SBGEO |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Geology |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Geology |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Geology - Sociedade Brasileira de Geologia (SBGEO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
sbgsede@sbgeo.org.br||claudio.riccomini@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1752122399434735616 |