Comparison between different cut-off points in the classification of frailty profile in community-living elderly

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva,Silvia Lanziotti Azevedo da
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Silva,Vanessa Gomes da, Máximo,Leani Sousa, Dias,João Marcos Domingues, Dias,Rosangela Correa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ggaging.com/details/234
Resumo: <p><b>INTRODUCTION:</b> The diagnosis of frailty in complex and difficult. The phenotype of Fried is a tool used to classify the elderly according to his or her profile of frailty. Among its five items, the reduction of grip strength, level of physical activity and slow gait speed may suffer influence of anthropometric characteristics of the population.<br> <b>OBJECTIVE:</b> Compare the frequency of frailty using cutoff points of Fried <i>et al.</i> (2001) and others adjusted for this sample.<br> <b>METHODS:</b> 125 elderly community (70.4% women, average age 73.77 ± 5.65 years) were assessed by the Phenotype of Frailty. After application of the phenotype, the elderly were classified as frail, pre-frail and non-frail, initially using the cutoff points used by Fried <i>et al.</i> (2001) in CHS. After that, they were reclassified using cutoffs adjusted by samples percentil 20, for grip strength, physical activity level and slow gait speed. We analyzed the frequency of frailty in each classification and the comparison made by the chi-square test (X<sup>2</sup>), using &#945; = 0.05.<br> <b>RESULTS:</b> The distributions of frailty were distinct when used different cutoff points, but the pre-frail group was the biggest in both situations. The exhaustion criterion was score positive for 28% of the elderly in both classifications. There was no significant difference between the distributions according to X<sup>2</sup> test (p = 0.356).<br> <b>CONCLUSION:</b> There was not significant difference in the distribution of frailty using the two cutoff points proposed. Exhaustion criterion was frequent and does not change its cutoff point, justifying the result.</p>
id SBGG_1171bd4f47aaec4462d9e70a8a6b3f5e
oai_identifier_str oai:ggaging.com:234
network_acronym_str SBGG
network_name_str Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison between different cut-off points in the classification of frailty profile in community-living elderlyFrail elderly, phenotype, diagnose criteria.<p><b>INTRODUCTION:</b> The diagnosis of frailty in complex and difficult. The phenotype of Fried is a tool used to classify the elderly according to his or her profile of frailty. Among its five items, the reduction of grip strength, level of physical activity and slow gait speed may suffer influence of anthropometric characteristics of the population.<br> <b>OBJECTIVE:</b> Compare the frequency of frailty using cutoff points of Fried <i>et al.</i> (2001) and others adjusted for this sample.<br> <b>METHODS:</b> 125 elderly community (70.4% women, average age 73.77 ± 5.65 years) were assessed by the Phenotype of Frailty. After application of the phenotype, the elderly were classified as frail, pre-frail and non-frail, initially using the cutoff points used by Fried <i>et al.</i> (2001) in CHS. After that, they were reclassified using cutoffs adjusted by samples percentil 20, for grip strength, physical activity level and slow gait speed. We analyzed the frequency of frailty in each classification and the comparison made by the chi-square test (X<sup>2</sup>), using &#945; = 0.05.<br> <b>RESULTS:</b> The distributions of frailty were distinct when used different cutoff points, but the pre-frail group was the biggest in both situations. The exhaustion criterion was score positive for 28% of the elderly in both classifications. There was no significant difference between the distributions according to X<sup>2</sup> test (p = 0.356).<br> <b>CONCLUSION:</b> There was not significant difference in the distribution of frailty using the two cutoff points proposed. Exhaustion criterion was frequent and does not change its cutoff point, justifying the result.</p>Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia2011-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttps://ggaging.com/details/234Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging v.5 n.3 2011reponame:Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologiainstacron:SBGGinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Silva,Silvia Lanziotti Azevedo da Silva,Vanessa Gomes da Máximo,Leani Sousa Dias,João Marcos Domingues Dias,Rosangela Correaeng2011-07-01T00:00:00Zoai:ggaging.com:234Revistahttp://sbgg.org.br/publicacoes-cientificas/revista-geriatria-gerontologia/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpexecutiveditors@ggaging.com||nacional@sbgg.org.br2447-21232447-2115opendoar:2011-07-01T00:00Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison between different cut-off points in the classification of frailty profile in community-living elderly
title Comparison between different cut-off points in the classification of frailty profile in community-living elderly
spellingShingle Comparison between different cut-off points in the classification of frailty profile in community-living elderly
Silva,Silvia Lanziotti Azevedo da
Frail elderly, phenotype, diagnose criteria.
title_short Comparison between different cut-off points in the classification of frailty profile in community-living elderly
title_full Comparison between different cut-off points in the classification of frailty profile in community-living elderly
title_fullStr Comparison between different cut-off points in the classification of frailty profile in community-living elderly
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between different cut-off points in the classification of frailty profile in community-living elderly
title_sort Comparison between different cut-off points in the classification of frailty profile in community-living elderly
author Silva,Silvia Lanziotti Azevedo da
author_facet Silva,Silvia Lanziotti Azevedo da
Silva,Vanessa Gomes da
Máximo,Leani Sousa
Dias,João Marcos Domingues
Dias,Rosangela Correa
author_role author
author2 Silva,Vanessa Gomes da
Máximo,Leani Sousa
Dias,João Marcos Domingues
Dias,Rosangela Correa
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva,Silvia Lanziotti Azevedo da
Silva,Vanessa Gomes da
Máximo,Leani Sousa
Dias,João Marcos Domingues
Dias,Rosangela Correa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Frail elderly, phenotype, diagnose criteria.
topic Frail elderly, phenotype, diagnose criteria.
description <p><b>INTRODUCTION:</b> The diagnosis of frailty in complex and difficult. The phenotype of Fried is a tool used to classify the elderly according to his or her profile of frailty. Among its five items, the reduction of grip strength, level of physical activity and slow gait speed may suffer influence of anthropometric characteristics of the population.<br> <b>OBJECTIVE:</b> Compare the frequency of frailty using cutoff points of Fried <i>et al.</i> (2001) and others adjusted for this sample.<br> <b>METHODS:</b> 125 elderly community (70.4% women, average age 73.77 ± 5.65 years) were assessed by the Phenotype of Frailty. After application of the phenotype, the elderly were classified as frail, pre-frail and non-frail, initially using the cutoff points used by Fried <i>et al.</i> (2001) in CHS. After that, they were reclassified using cutoffs adjusted by samples percentil 20, for grip strength, physical activity level and slow gait speed. We analyzed the frequency of frailty in each classification and the comparison made by the chi-square test (X<sup>2</sup>), using &#945; = 0.05.<br> <b>RESULTS:</b> The distributions of frailty were distinct when used different cutoff points, but the pre-frail group was the biggest in both situations. The exhaustion criterion was score positive for 28% of the elderly in both classifications. There was no significant difference between the distributions according to X<sup>2</sup> test (p = 0.356).<br> <b>CONCLUSION:</b> There was not significant difference in the distribution of frailty using the two cutoff points proposed. Exhaustion criterion was frequent and does not change its cutoff point, justifying the result.</p>
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-07-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ggaging.com/details/234
url https://ggaging.com/details/234
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging v.5 n.3 2011
reponame:Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
instacron:SBGG
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
instacron_str SBGG
institution SBGG
reponame_str Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
collection Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv executiveditors@ggaging.com||nacional@sbgg.org.br
_version_ 1797174501288443904