Polypharmacy and the use of potentially inappropriate medications among aged inpatients

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira,Marcus Vinicius Palmeira
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Buarque,David Costa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ggaging.com/details/456
Resumo: <p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> In Brazil, 70% of older adults have at least one chronic disease and, of these, 60% use more than four medications regularly, characterizing polypharmacy. Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are used by 40% of this population. Both polypharmacy and PIM use are associated with negative outcomes, such as increased frequency of drug interactions, falls, frailty, malnutrition, and in some cases, death.<br> <b>METHOD:</b> This was a cross-sectional study with retrospective data collection of all older patients admitted for clinical reasons to a tertiary care hospital in Brazil from March 2015 to February 2016. We evaluated patients for the presence of polypharmacy and PIM use, correlating these findings with other variables of interest.<br> <b>RESULTS:</b> The medical records of 456 patients were analyzed. Mean patient age was 83 years, and 71.3% were women. The mean Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was 2.38, and dementia was the most prevalent comorbidity (36.6%). Polypharmacy was present in 56.5% of patients, and 46.4% of them used at least one PIM. Antipsychotics were the most frequently used PIM (46.2%), followed by benzodiazepines (33.0%). Drug interactions were detected in 53.5% of patients. The presence of polypharmacy was associated with the use of PIMs (p &lt; 0.001). Additionally, both polypharmacy and PIM use were associated with drug interactions (p &lt; 0.01), poorer functional status (p &lt; 0.01), and higher CCI (p = 0.015).<br> <b>CONCLUSION:</b> In this study population, the prevalence of polypharmacy was 56.5%, and 46.5% of cases included the use of PIMs. Both conditions were associated with drug interactions, poorer functional status, and higher CCl.</p>
id SBGG_8db739ef515007abcac042ea597d6503
oai_identifier_str oai:ggaging.com:456
network_acronym_str SBGG
network_name_str Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Polypharmacy and the use of potentially inappropriate medications among aged inpatientshealth of the elderly inappropriate prescribing polypharmacy<p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> In Brazil, 70% of older adults have at least one chronic disease and, of these, 60% use more than four medications regularly, characterizing polypharmacy. Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are used by 40% of this population. Both polypharmacy and PIM use are associated with negative outcomes, such as increased frequency of drug interactions, falls, frailty, malnutrition, and in some cases, death.<br> <b>METHOD:</b> This was a cross-sectional study with retrospective data collection of all older patients admitted for clinical reasons to a tertiary care hospital in Brazil from March 2015 to February 2016. We evaluated patients for the presence of polypharmacy and PIM use, correlating these findings with other variables of interest.<br> <b>RESULTS:</b> The medical records of 456 patients were analyzed. Mean patient age was 83 years, and 71.3% were women. The mean Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was 2.38, and dementia was the most prevalent comorbidity (36.6%). Polypharmacy was present in 56.5% of patients, and 46.4% of them used at least one PIM. Antipsychotics were the most frequently used PIM (46.2%), followed by benzodiazepines (33.0%). Drug interactions were detected in 53.5% of patients. The presence of polypharmacy was associated with the use of PIMs (p &lt; 0.001). Additionally, both polypharmacy and PIM use were associated with drug interactions (p &lt; 0.01), poorer functional status (p &lt; 0.01), and higher CCI (p = 0.015).<br> <b>CONCLUSION:</b> In this study population, the prevalence of polypharmacy was 56.5%, and 46.5% of cases included the use of PIMs. Both conditions were associated with drug interactions, poorer functional status, and higher CCl.</p>Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttps://ggaging.com/details/456Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging v.12 n.1 2018reponame:Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologiainstacron:SBGG10.5327/Z2447-211520181800001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Oliveira,Marcus Vinicius Palmeira Buarque,David Costaeng2018-01-01T00:00:00Zoai:ggaging.com:456Revistahttp://sbgg.org.br/publicacoes-cientificas/revista-geriatria-gerontologia/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpexecutiveditors@ggaging.com||nacional@sbgg.org.br2447-21232447-2115opendoar:2018-01-01T00:00Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Polypharmacy and the use of potentially inappropriate medications among aged inpatients
title Polypharmacy and the use of potentially inappropriate medications among aged inpatients
spellingShingle Polypharmacy and the use of potentially inappropriate medications among aged inpatients
Oliveira,Marcus Vinicius Palmeira
health of the elderly
inappropriate prescribing
polypharmacy
title_short Polypharmacy and the use of potentially inappropriate medications among aged inpatients
title_full Polypharmacy and the use of potentially inappropriate medications among aged inpatients
title_fullStr Polypharmacy and the use of potentially inappropriate medications among aged inpatients
title_full_unstemmed Polypharmacy and the use of potentially inappropriate medications among aged inpatients
title_sort Polypharmacy and the use of potentially inappropriate medications among aged inpatients
author Oliveira,Marcus Vinicius Palmeira
author_facet Oliveira,Marcus Vinicius Palmeira
Buarque,David Costa
author_role author
author2 Buarque,David Costa
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira,Marcus Vinicius Palmeira
Buarque,David Costa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv health of the elderly
inappropriate prescribing
polypharmacy
topic health of the elderly
inappropriate prescribing
polypharmacy
description <p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> In Brazil, 70% of older adults have at least one chronic disease and, of these, 60% use more than four medications regularly, characterizing polypharmacy. Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are used by 40% of this population. Both polypharmacy and PIM use are associated with negative outcomes, such as increased frequency of drug interactions, falls, frailty, malnutrition, and in some cases, death.<br> <b>METHOD:</b> This was a cross-sectional study with retrospective data collection of all older patients admitted for clinical reasons to a tertiary care hospital in Brazil from March 2015 to February 2016. We evaluated patients for the presence of polypharmacy and PIM use, correlating these findings with other variables of interest.<br> <b>RESULTS:</b> The medical records of 456 patients were analyzed. Mean patient age was 83 years, and 71.3% were women. The mean Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was 2.38, and dementia was the most prevalent comorbidity (36.6%). Polypharmacy was present in 56.5% of patients, and 46.4% of them used at least one PIM. Antipsychotics were the most frequently used PIM (46.2%), followed by benzodiazepines (33.0%). Drug interactions were detected in 53.5% of patients. The presence of polypharmacy was associated with the use of PIMs (p &lt; 0.001). Additionally, both polypharmacy and PIM use were associated with drug interactions (p &lt; 0.01), poorer functional status (p &lt; 0.01), and higher CCI (p = 0.015).<br> <b>CONCLUSION:</b> In this study population, the prevalence of polypharmacy was 56.5%, and 46.5% of cases included the use of PIMs. Both conditions were associated with drug interactions, poorer functional status, and higher CCl.</p>
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ggaging.com/details/456
url https://ggaging.com/details/456
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5327/Z2447-211520181800001
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging v.12 n.1 2018
reponame:Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
instacron:SBGG
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
instacron_str SBGG
institution SBGG
reponame_str Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
collection Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv executiveditors@ggaging.com||nacional@sbgg.org.br
_version_ 1797174502112624640