Applicability of diet quality assessment instruments in the oldest-old: ampal study of diet quality assessment

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ianiski,Valéria Baccarin
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Gheno,Flávia Picoli, Bós,Ângelo José Gonçalves
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ggaging.com/details/531
Resumo: <p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To compare the applicability of the 2006 Brazilian Ministry of Health food guide questionnaire <i>Como ter uma alimentação saudável</i> (QGAS — How to have a healthy diet) and the 2013 National Health Survey healthy eating questionnaire (QA-PNS) for determining quality of life among the oldest-old (85 years and older).<br> <b>METHODS:</b> This descriptive, quantitative, cross-sectional and analytical study included 44 oldest-old participants from a multi-professional care project (AMPAL) in Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, who were evaluated at home. Eating habits were assessed using two questionnaires applied by nutritionists and other health professionals. The QA-PNS score was adapted to the QGAS score to facilitate comparison.<br> <b>RESULTS:</b> Applying the QA-PNS was easier for non-nutritionists and was significantly related to the QGAS, with a correlation coefficient (r2) of 0.67. The women’s diet quality was better according to the QGAS (10 out of 18 items evaluated), but the men’s was better according to the QA-PNS (8 out of 15 items evaluated).<br> <b>CONCLUSION:</b> There was good correlation between the QA-PNS and QGAS questionnaires for evaluating diet quality in the oldest-old.</p>
id SBGG_96cf25a71911ca9457923a8a193fe3b6
oai_identifier_str oai:ggaging.com:531
network_acronym_str SBGG
network_name_str Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Applicability of diet quality assessment instruments in the oldest-old: ampal study of diet quality assessmentlongevity surveys and questionnaires healthy diet aged, 80 and over.<p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To compare the applicability of the 2006 Brazilian Ministry of Health food guide questionnaire <i>Como ter uma alimentação saudável</i> (QGAS — How to have a healthy diet) and the 2013 National Health Survey healthy eating questionnaire (QA-PNS) for determining quality of life among the oldest-old (85 years and older).<br> <b>METHODS:</b> This descriptive, quantitative, cross-sectional and analytical study included 44 oldest-old participants from a multi-professional care project (AMPAL) in Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, who were evaluated at home. Eating habits were assessed using two questionnaires applied by nutritionists and other health professionals. The QA-PNS score was adapted to the QGAS score to facilitate comparison.<br> <b>RESULTS:</b> Applying the QA-PNS was easier for non-nutritionists and was significantly related to the QGAS, with a correlation coefficient (r2) of 0.67. The women’s diet quality was better according to the QGAS (10 out of 18 items evaluated), but the men’s was better according to the QA-PNS (8 out of 15 items evaluated).<br> <b>CONCLUSION:</b> There was good correlation between the QA-PNS and QGAS questionnaires for evaluating diet quality in the oldest-old.</p>Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia2019-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttps://ggaging.com/details/531Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging v.13 n.2 2019reponame:Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologiainstacron:SBGG10.5327/Z2447-211520191900023info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Ianiski,Valéria Baccarin Gheno,Flávia Picoli Bós,Ângelo José Gonçalveseng2019-04-01T00:00:00Zoai:ggaging.com:531Revistahttp://sbgg.org.br/publicacoes-cientificas/revista-geriatria-gerontologia/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpexecutiveditors@ggaging.com||nacional@sbgg.org.br2447-21232447-2115opendoar:2019-04-01T00:00Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Applicability of diet quality assessment instruments in the oldest-old: ampal study of diet quality assessment
title Applicability of diet quality assessment instruments in the oldest-old: ampal study of diet quality assessment
spellingShingle Applicability of diet quality assessment instruments in the oldest-old: ampal study of diet quality assessment
Ianiski,Valéria Baccarin
longevity
surveys and questionnaires
healthy diet
aged, 80 and over.
title_short Applicability of diet quality assessment instruments in the oldest-old: ampal study of diet quality assessment
title_full Applicability of diet quality assessment instruments in the oldest-old: ampal study of diet quality assessment
title_fullStr Applicability of diet quality assessment instruments in the oldest-old: ampal study of diet quality assessment
title_full_unstemmed Applicability of diet quality assessment instruments in the oldest-old: ampal study of diet quality assessment
title_sort Applicability of diet quality assessment instruments in the oldest-old: ampal study of diet quality assessment
author Ianiski,Valéria Baccarin
author_facet Ianiski,Valéria Baccarin
Gheno,Flávia Picoli
Bós,Ângelo José Gonçalves
author_role author
author2 Gheno,Flávia Picoli
Bós,Ângelo José Gonçalves
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ianiski,Valéria Baccarin
Gheno,Flávia Picoli
Bós,Ângelo José Gonçalves
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv longevity
surveys and questionnaires
healthy diet
aged, 80 and over.
topic longevity
surveys and questionnaires
healthy diet
aged, 80 and over.
description <p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To compare the applicability of the 2006 Brazilian Ministry of Health food guide questionnaire <i>Como ter uma alimentação saudável</i> (QGAS — How to have a healthy diet) and the 2013 National Health Survey healthy eating questionnaire (QA-PNS) for determining quality of life among the oldest-old (85 years and older).<br> <b>METHODS:</b> This descriptive, quantitative, cross-sectional and analytical study included 44 oldest-old participants from a multi-professional care project (AMPAL) in Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, who were evaluated at home. Eating habits were assessed using two questionnaires applied by nutritionists and other health professionals. The QA-PNS score was adapted to the QGAS score to facilitate comparison.<br> <b>RESULTS:</b> Applying the QA-PNS was easier for non-nutritionists and was significantly related to the QGAS, with a correlation coefficient (r2) of 0.67. The women’s diet quality was better according to the QGAS (10 out of 18 items evaluated), but the men’s was better according to the QA-PNS (8 out of 15 items evaluated).<br> <b>CONCLUSION:</b> There was good correlation between the QA-PNS and QGAS questionnaires for evaluating diet quality in the oldest-old.</p>
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ggaging.com/details/531
url https://ggaging.com/details/531
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5327/Z2447-211520191900023
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging v.13 n.2 2019
reponame:Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
instacron:SBGG
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
instacron_str SBGG
institution SBGG
reponame_str Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
collection Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv executiveditors@ggaging.com||nacional@sbgg.org.br
_version_ 1797174502461800448