Brazilian consensus of potentially inappropriate medication for elderly people

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira,Márcio Galvão
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Amorim,Welma Wildes, Oliveira,Caroline Ribeiro Borja, Coqueiro,Hérica Lima, Gusmão,Letícia Cruz, Passos,Luiz Carlos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ggaging.com/details/397
Resumo: <p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To validate the 2012 Beers criteria and the 2006 STOPP contents, in order to elaborate a national classification criteria of potentially inappropriate medication for the elderly.<br> <b>METHODS:</b> A two-round modified Delphi technique was employed to establish the Brazilian Consensus of Potentially Inappropriate Medications in the elderly, based on the 2012 Beers criteria and 2006 STOPP. The expert panel was composed of ten individuals. An electronic questionnaire was used, in which each expert scored the criteria through a 5-points Likert scale. In the first round, the participants were asked to assess the potential inadequacy of a preliminary list of medicines and propose suggestions. Then, for each criterion, the scores mean was calculated and its respective 95% CI. The criteria with a 95% CI &gt; 4,0 upper limit were submitted to the second round. All medicines in the criteria with a 95% CI <u>&gt;</u> 4,0 lower limit, in the second round, were classified as potentially inappropriate.<br> <b>RESULTS:</b> The criteria that did not reach consensus were: aspirin use for primary prevention of cardiovascular events, sliding scale insulin prescription and the use of alpha-blockers, oral or transdermal estrogens and tricyclic antidepressants for the elderly with urinary tract incontinence. At the end, there were 118 criteria, in which 43 were independent from clinical conditions and 75 were dependent from clinical conditions/disease of the elderly.<br> <b>CONCLUSION:</b> It was validated a criteria of medicines that should be avoided in the elderly. These data can optimize the medicines prescription in this population.</p>
id SBGG_c6c1ed51c3671fcffc9f2f3e4401788a
oai_identifier_str oai:ggaging.com:397
network_acronym_str SBGG
network_name_str Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Brazilian consensus of potentially inappropriate medication for elderly peoplepotentially inappropriate medications list aged Brazil.<p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To validate the 2012 Beers criteria and the 2006 STOPP contents, in order to elaborate a national classification criteria of potentially inappropriate medication for the elderly.<br> <b>METHODS:</b> A two-round modified Delphi technique was employed to establish the Brazilian Consensus of Potentially Inappropriate Medications in the elderly, based on the 2012 Beers criteria and 2006 STOPP. The expert panel was composed of ten individuals. An electronic questionnaire was used, in which each expert scored the criteria through a 5-points Likert scale. In the first round, the participants were asked to assess the potential inadequacy of a preliminary list of medicines and propose suggestions. Then, for each criterion, the scores mean was calculated and its respective 95% CI. The criteria with a 95% CI &gt; 4,0 upper limit were submitted to the second round. All medicines in the criteria with a 95% CI <u>&gt;</u> 4,0 lower limit, in the second round, were classified as potentially inappropriate.<br> <b>RESULTS:</b> The criteria that did not reach consensus were: aspirin use for primary prevention of cardiovascular events, sliding scale insulin prescription and the use of alpha-blockers, oral or transdermal estrogens and tricyclic antidepressants for the elderly with urinary tract incontinence. At the end, there were 118 criteria, in which 43 were independent from clinical conditions and 75 were dependent from clinical conditions/disease of the elderly.<br> <b>CONCLUSION:</b> It was validated a criteria of medicines that should be avoided in the elderly. These data can optimize the medicines prescription in this population.</p>Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia2016-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttps://ggaging.com/details/397Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging v.10 n.4 2016reponame:Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologiainstacron:SBGGinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Oliveira,Márcio Galvão Amorim,Welma Wildes Oliveira,Caroline Ribeiro Borja Coqueiro,Hérica Lima Gusmão,Letícia Cruz Passos,Luiz Carloseng2016-10-01T00:00:00Zoai:ggaging.com:397Revistahttp://sbgg.org.br/publicacoes-cientificas/revista-geriatria-gerontologia/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpexecutiveditors@ggaging.com||nacional@sbgg.org.br2447-21232447-2115opendoar:2016-10-01T00:00Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian consensus of potentially inappropriate medication for elderly people
title Brazilian consensus of potentially inappropriate medication for elderly people
spellingShingle Brazilian consensus of potentially inappropriate medication for elderly people
Oliveira,Márcio Galvão
potentially inappropriate medications list
aged
Brazil.
title_short Brazilian consensus of potentially inappropriate medication for elderly people
title_full Brazilian consensus of potentially inappropriate medication for elderly people
title_fullStr Brazilian consensus of potentially inappropriate medication for elderly people
title_full_unstemmed Brazilian consensus of potentially inappropriate medication for elderly people
title_sort Brazilian consensus of potentially inappropriate medication for elderly people
author Oliveira,Márcio Galvão
author_facet Oliveira,Márcio Galvão
Amorim,Welma Wildes
Oliveira,Caroline Ribeiro Borja
Coqueiro,Hérica Lima
Gusmão,Letícia Cruz
Passos,Luiz Carlos
author_role author
author2 Amorim,Welma Wildes
Oliveira,Caroline Ribeiro Borja
Coqueiro,Hérica Lima
Gusmão,Letícia Cruz
Passos,Luiz Carlos
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira,Márcio Galvão
Amorim,Welma Wildes
Oliveira,Caroline Ribeiro Borja
Coqueiro,Hérica Lima
Gusmão,Letícia Cruz
Passos,Luiz Carlos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv potentially inappropriate medications list
aged
Brazil.
topic potentially inappropriate medications list
aged
Brazil.
description <p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To validate the 2012 Beers criteria and the 2006 STOPP contents, in order to elaborate a national classification criteria of potentially inappropriate medication for the elderly.<br> <b>METHODS:</b> A two-round modified Delphi technique was employed to establish the Brazilian Consensus of Potentially Inappropriate Medications in the elderly, based on the 2012 Beers criteria and 2006 STOPP. The expert panel was composed of ten individuals. An electronic questionnaire was used, in which each expert scored the criteria through a 5-points Likert scale. In the first round, the participants were asked to assess the potential inadequacy of a preliminary list of medicines and propose suggestions. Then, for each criterion, the scores mean was calculated and its respective 95% CI. The criteria with a 95% CI &gt; 4,0 upper limit were submitted to the second round. All medicines in the criteria with a 95% CI <u>&gt;</u> 4,0 lower limit, in the second round, were classified as potentially inappropriate.<br> <b>RESULTS:</b> The criteria that did not reach consensus were: aspirin use for primary prevention of cardiovascular events, sliding scale insulin prescription and the use of alpha-blockers, oral or transdermal estrogens and tricyclic antidepressants for the elderly with urinary tract incontinence. At the end, there were 118 criteria, in which 43 were independent from clinical conditions and 75 were dependent from clinical conditions/disease of the elderly.<br> <b>CONCLUSION:</b> It was validated a criteria of medicines that should be avoided in the elderly. These data can optimize the medicines prescription in this population.</p>
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ggaging.com/details/397
url https://ggaging.com/details/397
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging v.10 n.4 2016
reponame:Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
instacron:SBGG
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
instacron_str SBGG
institution SBGG
reponame_str Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
collection Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv executiveditors@ggaging.com||nacional@sbgg.org.br
_version_ 1797174502036078592