Brazilian consensus of potentially inappropriate medication for elderly people
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ggaging.com/details/397 |
Resumo: | <p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To validate the 2012 Beers criteria and the 2006 STOPP contents, in order to elaborate a national classification criteria of potentially inappropriate medication for the elderly.<br> <b>METHODS:</b> A two-round modified Delphi technique was employed to establish the Brazilian Consensus of Potentially Inappropriate Medications in the elderly, based on the 2012 Beers criteria and 2006 STOPP. The expert panel was composed of ten individuals. An electronic questionnaire was used, in which each expert scored the criteria through a 5-points Likert scale. In the first round, the participants were asked to assess the potential inadequacy of a preliminary list of medicines and propose suggestions. Then, for each criterion, the scores mean was calculated and its respective 95% CI. The criteria with a 95% CI > 4,0 upper limit were submitted to the second round. All medicines in the criteria with a 95% CI <u>></u> 4,0 lower limit, in the second round, were classified as potentially inappropriate.<br> <b>RESULTS:</b> The criteria that did not reach consensus were: aspirin use for primary prevention of cardiovascular events, sliding scale insulin prescription and the use of alpha-blockers, oral or transdermal estrogens and tricyclic antidepressants for the elderly with urinary tract incontinence. At the end, there were 118 criteria, in which 43 were independent from clinical conditions and 75 were dependent from clinical conditions/disease of the elderly.<br> <b>CONCLUSION:</b> It was validated a criteria of medicines that should be avoided in the elderly. These data can optimize the medicines prescription in this population.</p> |
id |
SBGG_c6c1ed51c3671fcffc9f2f3e4401788a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ggaging.com:397 |
network_acronym_str |
SBGG |
network_name_str |
Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Brazilian consensus of potentially inappropriate medication for elderly peoplepotentially inappropriate medications list aged Brazil.<p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To validate the 2012 Beers criteria and the 2006 STOPP contents, in order to elaborate a national classification criteria of potentially inappropriate medication for the elderly.<br> <b>METHODS:</b> A two-round modified Delphi technique was employed to establish the Brazilian Consensus of Potentially Inappropriate Medications in the elderly, based on the 2012 Beers criteria and 2006 STOPP. The expert panel was composed of ten individuals. An electronic questionnaire was used, in which each expert scored the criteria through a 5-points Likert scale. In the first round, the participants were asked to assess the potential inadequacy of a preliminary list of medicines and propose suggestions. Then, for each criterion, the scores mean was calculated and its respective 95% CI. The criteria with a 95% CI > 4,0 upper limit were submitted to the second round. All medicines in the criteria with a 95% CI <u>></u> 4,0 lower limit, in the second round, were classified as potentially inappropriate.<br> <b>RESULTS:</b> The criteria that did not reach consensus were: aspirin use for primary prevention of cardiovascular events, sliding scale insulin prescription and the use of alpha-blockers, oral or transdermal estrogens and tricyclic antidepressants for the elderly with urinary tract incontinence. At the end, there were 118 criteria, in which 43 were independent from clinical conditions and 75 were dependent from clinical conditions/disease of the elderly.<br> <b>CONCLUSION:</b> It was validated a criteria of medicines that should be avoided in the elderly. These data can optimize the medicines prescription in this population.</p>Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia2016-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttps://ggaging.com/details/397Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging v.10 n.4 2016reponame:Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologiainstacron:SBGGinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Oliveira,Márcio Galvão Amorim,Welma Wildes Oliveira,Caroline Ribeiro Borja Coqueiro,Hérica Lima Gusmão,Letícia Cruz Passos,Luiz Carloseng2016-10-01T00:00:00Zoai:ggaging.com:397Revistahttp://sbgg.org.br/publicacoes-cientificas/revista-geriatria-gerontologia/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpexecutiveditors@ggaging.com||nacional@sbgg.org.br2447-21232447-2115opendoar:2016-10-01T00:00Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian consensus of potentially inappropriate medication for elderly people |
title |
Brazilian consensus of potentially inappropriate medication for elderly people |
spellingShingle |
Brazilian consensus of potentially inappropriate medication for elderly people Oliveira,Márcio Galvão potentially inappropriate medications list aged Brazil. |
title_short |
Brazilian consensus of potentially inappropriate medication for elderly people |
title_full |
Brazilian consensus of potentially inappropriate medication for elderly people |
title_fullStr |
Brazilian consensus of potentially inappropriate medication for elderly people |
title_full_unstemmed |
Brazilian consensus of potentially inappropriate medication for elderly people |
title_sort |
Brazilian consensus of potentially inappropriate medication for elderly people |
author |
Oliveira,Márcio Galvão |
author_facet |
Oliveira,Márcio Galvão Amorim,Welma Wildes Oliveira,Caroline Ribeiro Borja Coqueiro,Hérica Lima Gusmão,Letícia Cruz Passos,Luiz Carlos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Amorim,Welma Wildes Oliveira,Caroline Ribeiro Borja Coqueiro,Hérica Lima Gusmão,Letícia Cruz Passos,Luiz Carlos |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira,Márcio Galvão Amorim,Welma Wildes Oliveira,Caroline Ribeiro Borja Coqueiro,Hérica Lima Gusmão,Letícia Cruz Passos,Luiz Carlos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
potentially inappropriate medications list aged Brazil. |
topic |
potentially inappropriate medications list aged Brazil. |
description |
<p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To validate the 2012 Beers criteria and the 2006 STOPP contents, in order to elaborate a national classification criteria of potentially inappropriate medication for the elderly.<br> <b>METHODS:</b> A two-round modified Delphi technique was employed to establish the Brazilian Consensus of Potentially Inappropriate Medications in the elderly, based on the 2012 Beers criteria and 2006 STOPP. The expert panel was composed of ten individuals. An electronic questionnaire was used, in which each expert scored the criteria through a 5-points Likert scale. In the first round, the participants were asked to assess the potential inadequacy of a preliminary list of medicines and propose suggestions. Then, for each criterion, the scores mean was calculated and its respective 95% CI. The criteria with a 95% CI > 4,0 upper limit were submitted to the second round. All medicines in the criteria with a 95% CI <u>></u> 4,0 lower limit, in the second round, were classified as potentially inappropriate.<br> <b>RESULTS:</b> The criteria that did not reach consensus were: aspirin use for primary prevention of cardiovascular events, sliding scale insulin prescription and the use of alpha-blockers, oral or transdermal estrogens and tricyclic antidepressants for the elderly with urinary tract incontinence. At the end, there were 118 criteria, in which 43 were independent from clinical conditions and 75 were dependent from clinical conditions/disease of the elderly.<br> <b>CONCLUSION:</b> It was validated a criteria of medicines that should be avoided in the elderly. These data can optimize the medicines prescription in this population.</p> |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ggaging.com/details/397 |
url |
https://ggaging.com/details/397 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging v.10 n.4 2016 reponame:Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia instacron:SBGG |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia |
instacron_str |
SBGG |
institution |
SBGG |
reponame_str |
Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) |
collection |
Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
executiveditors@ggaging.com||nacional@sbgg.org.br |
_version_ |
1797174502036078592 |