Accuracy of survival prediction instruments in older patients undergoing home-based palliative care in Curitiba, Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moretti,Ricardo Papp
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Cechinel,Clovis, Espindola,Rafaela
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ggaging.com/details/568
Resumo: <p><b>INTRODUCTION:</b> Prognostic scores are crucial to avoid unnecessary measures in palliative care, although their use in non-cancer patients undergoing home care in low-income countries lacks evidence.<br> <b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To compare the accuracy of the survival prediction instruments Palliative Performance Scale (PPS), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI), and Palliative Prognostic Score (PaP) in the older population treated by a Home Care Service (HCS) program in Curitiba, southern Brazil.<br> <b>METHODS:</b> This is a prospective, observational, diagnostic accuracy study evaluating older adults undergoing HCS-provided palliative care. PPS, The PPS, KPS, PaP, and PPI scores were administered, and after 90 days the patients were evaluated for the outcomes death and hospital admission. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 53 patients aged &ge; 60 years; 28.3% (n = 15) of those had age &ge; 85 years. In the binary analysis, PaP had the best accuracy (79.2%). In the ordinal analysis, PPI had the best accuracy (58.5%), but all prognostic scales evaluated the sample similarly, with no significant differences. In both analyses, the patients aged &ge; 85 years had similar results compared to the total sample. Although the HCS program is a distinct setting, the study results were similar to those of studies conducted in hospices and hospitals.<br> <b>CONCLUSION:</b> The prognostic scores showed better accuracy when predicting only the outcome death but are less accurate when admission is included. There was no superior scale neither any difference in accuracy regarding age range.</p>
id SBGG_d0a72e0b3d1cc646c3d18247b83b6114
oai_identifier_str oai:ggaging.com:568
network_acronym_str SBGG
network_name_str Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Accuracy of survival prediction instruments in older patients undergoing home-based palliative care in Curitiba, Brazilaged home care services palliative care palliative medicine prognosis survival.<p><b>INTRODUCTION:</b> Prognostic scores are crucial to avoid unnecessary measures in palliative care, although their use in non-cancer patients undergoing home care in low-income countries lacks evidence.<br> <b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To compare the accuracy of the survival prediction instruments Palliative Performance Scale (PPS), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI), and Palliative Prognostic Score (PaP) in the older population treated by a Home Care Service (HCS) program in Curitiba, southern Brazil.<br> <b>METHODS:</b> This is a prospective, observational, diagnostic accuracy study evaluating older adults undergoing HCS-provided palliative care. PPS, The PPS, KPS, PaP, and PPI scores were administered, and after 90 days the patients were evaluated for the outcomes death and hospital admission. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 53 patients aged &ge; 60 years; 28.3% (n = 15) of those had age &ge; 85 years. In the binary analysis, PaP had the best accuracy (79.2%). In the ordinal analysis, PPI had the best accuracy (58.5%), but all prognostic scales evaluated the sample similarly, with no significant differences. In both analyses, the patients aged &ge; 85 years had similar results compared to the total sample. Although the HCS program is a distinct setting, the study results were similar to those of studies conducted in hospices and hospitals.<br> <b>CONCLUSION:</b> The prognostic scores showed better accuracy when predicting only the outcome death but are less accurate when admission is included. There was no superior scale neither any difference in accuracy regarding age range.</p>Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia2019-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttps://ggaging.com/details/568Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging v.13 n.4 2019reponame:Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologiainstacron:SBGG10.5327/Z2447-211520191900064info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Moretti,Ricardo Papp Cechinel,Clovis Espindola,Rafaelaeng2019-10-01T00:00:00Zoai:ggaging.com:568Revistahttp://sbgg.org.br/publicacoes-cientificas/revista-geriatria-gerontologia/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpexecutiveditors@ggaging.com||nacional@sbgg.org.br2447-21232447-2115opendoar:2019-10-01T00:00Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Accuracy of survival prediction instruments in older patients undergoing home-based palliative care in Curitiba, Brazil
title Accuracy of survival prediction instruments in older patients undergoing home-based palliative care in Curitiba, Brazil
spellingShingle Accuracy of survival prediction instruments in older patients undergoing home-based palliative care in Curitiba, Brazil
Moretti,Ricardo Papp
aged
home care services
palliative care
palliative medicine
prognosis
survival.
title_short Accuracy of survival prediction instruments in older patients undergoing home-based palliative care in Curitiba, Brazil
title_full Accuracy of survival prediction instruments in older patients undergoing home-based palliative care in Curitiba, Brazil
title_fullStr Accuracy of survival prediction instruments in older patients undergoing home-based palliative care in Curitiba, Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of survival prediction instruments in older patients undergoing home-based palliative care in Curitiba, Brazil
title_sort Accuracy of survival prediction instruments in older patients undergoing home-based palliative care in Curitiba, Brazil
author Moretti,Ricardo Papp
author_facet Moretti,Ricardo Papp
Cechinel,Clovis
Espindola,Rafaela
author_role author
author2 Cechinel,Clovis
Espindola,Rafaela
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moretti,Ricardo Papp
Cechinel,Clovis
Espindola,Rafaela
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv aged
home care services
palliative care
palliative medicine
prognosis
survival.
topic aged
home care services
palliative care
palliative medicine
prognosis
survival.
description <p><b>INTRODUCTION:</b> Prognostic scores are crucial to avoid unnecessary measures in palliative care, although their use in non-cancer patients undergoing home care in low-income countries lacks evidence.<br> <b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To compare the accuracy of the survival prediction instruments Palliative Performance Scale (PPS), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI), and Palliative Prognostic Score (PaP) in the older population treated by a Home Care Service (HCS) program in Curitiba, southern Brazil.<br> <b>METHODS:</b> This is a prospective, observational, diagnostic accuracy study evaluating older adults undergoing HCS-provided palliative care. PPS, The PPS, KPS, PaP, and PPI scores were administered, and after 90 days the patients were evaluated for the outcomes death and hospital admission. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 53 patients aged &ge; 60 years; 28.3% (n = 15) of those had age &ge; 85 years. In the binary analysis, PaP had the best accuracy (79.2%). In the ordinal analysis, PPI had the best accuracy (58.5%), but all prognostic scales evaluated the sample similarly, with no significant differences. In both analyses, the patients aged &ge; 85 years had similar results compared to the total sample. Although the HCS program is a distinct setting, the study results were similar to those of studies conducted in hospices and hospitals.<br> <b>CONCLUSION:</b> The prognostic scores showed better accuracy when predicting only the outcome death but are less accurate when admission is included. There was no superior scale neither any difference in accuracy regarding age range.</p>
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ggaging.com/details/568
url https://ggaging.com/details/568
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5327/Z2447-211520191900064
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging v.13 n.4 2019
reponame:Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
instacron:SBGG
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
instacron_str SBGG
institution SBGG
reponame_str Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
collection Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv executiveditors@ggaging.com||nacional@sbgg.org.br
_version_ 1797174502496403456