Influence of spawning procedure on gametes fertilization success in Salminus hilarii Valenciennes, 1850 (Teleostei: Characidae): Implications for the conservation of this species

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Honji,Renato M.
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Mello,Paulo H., Araújo,Bruno C., Rodrigues-Filho,Jandyr A., Hilsdorf,Alexandre W. S., Moreira,Renata G.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Neotropical ichthyology (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-62252011000200014
Resumo: Artificial reproduction and gamete fertilization were evaluated in Salminus hilarii wild and domesticated broodstocks. Wild and domesticated broodstocks were artificially induced to reproduction using a carp pituitary treatment. Four groups were considered: Group 1 (G1), fish caught in the wild maintained for three years in the same conditions as the domesticated broodstocks and spawned naturally; Group 2 (G2), broodstock born and raised in captivity and spawned naturally; Group 3 (G3), wild broodstocks, which were manually stripped for gamete collection and dry fertilization; and Group 4 (G4), domesticated males and females, also manually stripped. Oocytes, eggs, and larvae were sampled at different time intervals throughout embryonic development. Yolk sac absorption occurred approximately 24-29 h after hatching. Twenty-six h after hatching, the larvae mouths opened. Cannibalism was identified just 28-30 h after hatching. There was no morphological difference in embryonic development among all groups. The number of released eggs per gram of female was: G1: 83.3 ± 24.5 and G2: 103.8 ± 37.4; however, the fertilization success was lower in G2 (42.0 ± 6.37 %) compared with G1 (54.7 ± 3.02%) (P = 0.011). Hand-stripping of oocytes was not successful and the fertilization rate was zero. The reproduction of this species in captivity is viable, but it is necessary to improve broodstock management to enhance fertilization rates and obtain better fingerling production for restocking programs.
id SBI-1_3c2d72ac4e86bad037ca6584d859a459
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1679-62252011000200014
network_acronym_str SBI-1
network_name_str Neotropical ichthyology (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Influence of spawning procedure on gametes fertilization success in Salminus hilarii Valenciennes, 1850 (Teleostei: Characidae): Implications for the conservation of this speciesEarly developmentGrowthReproductionTabaranaArtificial reproduction and gamete fertilization were evaluated in Salminus hilarii wild and domesticated broodstocks. Wild and domesticated broodstocks were artificially induced to reproduction using a carp pituitary treatment. Four groups were considered: Group 1 (G1), fish caught in the wild maintained for three years in the same conditions as the domesticated broodstocks and spawned naturally; Group 2 (G2), broodstock born and raised in captivity and spawned naturally; Group 3 (G3), wild broodstocks, which were manually stripped for gamete collection and dry fertilization; and Group 4 (G4), domesticated males and females, also manually stripped. Oocytes, eggs, and larvae were sampled at different time intervals throughout embryonic development. Yolk sac absorption occurred approximately 24-29 h after hatching. Twenty-six h after hatching, the larvae mouths opened. Cannibalism was identified just 28-30 h after hatching. There was no morphological difference in embryonic development among all groups. The number of released eggs per gram of female was: G1: 83.3 ± 24.5 and G2: 103.8 ± 37.4; however, the fertilization success was lower in G2 (42.0 ± 6.37 %) compared with G1 (54.7 ± 3.02%) (P = 0.011). Hand-stripping of oocytes was not successful and the fertilization rate was zero. The reproduction of this species in captivity is viable, but it is necessary to improve broodstock management to enhance fertilization rates and obtain better fingerling production for restocking programs.Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia2011-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-62252011000200014Neotropical Ichthyology v.9 n.2 2011reponame:Neotropical ichthyology (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia (SBI)instacron:SBI10.1590/S1679-62252011005000012info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHonji,Renato M.Mello,Paulo H.Araújo,Bruno C.Rodrigues-Filho,Jandyr A.Hilsdorf,Alexandre W. S.Moreira,Renata G.eng2011-07-11T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1679-62252011000200014Revistahttp://www.ufrgs.br/ni/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||neoichth@nupelia.uem.br1982-02241679-6225opendoar:2011-07-11T00:00Neotropical ichthyology (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia (SBI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of spawning procedure on gametes fertilization success in Salminus hilarii Valenciennes, 1850 (Teleostei: Characidae): Implications for the conservation of this species
title Influence of spawning procedure on gametes fertilization success in Salminus hilarii Valenciennes, 1850 (Teleostei: Characidae): Implications for the conservation of this species
spellingShingle Influence of spawning procedure on gametes fertilization success in Salminus hilarii Valenciennes, 1850 (Teleostei: Characidae): Implications for the conservation of this species
Honji,Renato M.
Early development
Growth
Reproduction
Tabarana
title_short Influence of spawning procedure on gametes fertilization success in Salminus hilarii Valenciennes, 1850 (Teleostei: Characidae): Implications for the conservation of this species
title_full Influence of spawning procedure on gametes fertilization success in Salminus hilarii Valenciennes, 1850 (Teleostei: Characidae): Implications for the conservation of this species
title_fullStr Influence of spawning procedure on gametes fertilization success in Salminus hilarii Valenciennes, 1850 (Teleostei: Characidae): Implications for the conservation of this species
title_full_unstemmed Influence of spawning procedure on gametes fertilization success in Salminus hilarii Valenciennes, 1850 (Teleostei: Characidae): Implications for the conservation of this species
title_sort Influence of spawning procedure on gametes fertilization success in Salminus hilarii Valenciennes, 1850 (Teleostei: Characidae): Implications for the conservation of this species
author Honji,Renato M.
author_facet Honji,Renato M.
Mello,Paulo H.
Araújo,Bruno C.
Rodrigues-Filho,Jandyr A.
Hilsdorf,Alexandre W. S.
Moreira,Renata G.
author_role author
author2 Mello,Paulo H.
Araújo,Bruno C.
Rodrigues-Filho,Jandyr A.
Hilsdorf,Alexandre W. S.
Moreira,Renata G.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Honji,Renato M.
Mello,Paulo H.
Araújo,Bruno C.
Rodrigues-Filho,Jandyr A.
Hilsdorf,Alexandre W. S.
Moreira,Renata G.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Early development
Growth
Reproduction
Tabarana
topic Early development
Growth
Reproduction
Tabarana
description Artificial reproduction and gamete fertilization were evaluated in Salminus hilarii wild and domesticated broodstocks. Wild and domesticated broodstocks were artificially induced to reproduction using a carp pituitary treatment. Four groups were considered: Group 1 (G1), fish caught in the wild maintained for three years in the same conditions as the domesticated broodstocks and spawned naturally; Group 2 (G2), broodstock born and raised in captivity and spawned naturally; Group 3 (G3), wild broodstocks, which were manually stripped for gamete collection and dry fertilization; and Group 4 (G4), domesticated males and females, also manually stripped. Oocytes, eggs, and larvae were sampled at different time intervals throughout embryonic development. Yolk sac absorption occurred approximately 24-29 h after hatching. Twenty-six h after hatching, the larvae mouths opened. Cannibalism was identified just 28-30 h after hatching. There was no morphological difference in embryonic development among all groups. The number of released eggs per gram of female was: G1: 83.3 ± 24.5 and G2: 103.8 ± 37.4; however, the fertilization success was lower in G2 (42.0 ± 6.37 %) compared with G1 (54.7 ± 3.02%) (P = 0.011). Hand-stripping of oocytes was not successful and the fertilization rate was zero. The reproduction of this species in captivity is viable, but it is necessary to improve broodstock management to enhance fertilization rates and obtain better fingerling production for restocking programs.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-62252011000200014
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-62252011000200014
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1679-62252011005000012
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Neotropical Ichthyology v.9 n.2 2011
reponame:Neotropical ichthyology (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia (SBI)
instacron:SBI
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia (SBI)
instacron_str SBI
institution SBI
reponame_str Neotropical ichthyology (Online)
collection Neotropical ichthyology (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Neotropical ichthyology (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia (SBI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||neoichth@nupelia.uem.br
_version_ 1752122180006576128