Comparision of the BAX® System with an in-house MSRV method for the detection of Salmonella in chicken carcasses and pork meat
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2006 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Microbiology |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822006000400022 |
Resumo: | A study was performed to compare the analytical procedure of the BAX® System for Salmonella PCR assay with the Modified Semi-Solid Rappaport-Vassiliadis (MSRV) method, for the detection of Salmonella in naturally contaminated chicken carcass samples (n = 762) and raw pork meat (n = 566). The chicken carcasses samples were collected during slaughtering after defeathering or immediately after evisceration and the raw pork meat collected from the deboned head of recently slaughtered pigs and others deboned raw fresh pork meat. The BAX® System detected 134 Salmonella-positive samples in chicken carcasses and 145 samples in pork meat, while the MSRV method isolated 142 and 144 Salmonella-positive samples, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the two methods for chicken carcasses and pork meat, according to McNemar test at the 5% level. |
id |
SBM-1_2ee5b91275b5095a89c712c70b259ab7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1517-83822006000400022 |
network_acronym_str |
SBM-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparision of the BAX® System with an in-house MSRV method for the detection of Salmonella in chicken carcasses and pork meatBAX® SystemMSRV methodSalmonellachickenpork meatA study was performed to compare the analytical procedure of the BAX® System for Salmonella PCR assay with the Modified Semi-Solid Rappaport-Vassiliadis (MSRV) method, for the detection of Salmonella in naturally contaminated chicken carcass samples (n = 762) and raw pork meat (n = 566). The chicken carcasses samples were collected during slaughtering after defeathering or immediately after evisceration and the raw pork meat collected from the deboned head of recently slaughtered pigs and others deboned raw fresh pork meat. The BAX® System detected 134 Salmonella-positive samples in chicken carcasses and 145 samples in pork meat, while the MSRV method isolated 142 and 144 Salmonella-positive samples, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the two methods for chicken carcasses and pork meat, according to McNemar test at the 5% level.Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia2006-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822006000400022Brazilian Journal of Microbiology v.37 n.4 2006reponame:Brazilian Journal of Microbiologyinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM)instacron:SBM10.1590/S1517-83822006000400022info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFranchin,Paulo R.Ogliari,Paulo J.Andrade,Dalton F.Chiapinoto,MauraLemos,GiovanaRebelatto,MarinaSilva,Ivair G. daBatista,Cleide R.V.eng2007-03-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1517-83822006000400022Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bjm/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjm@sbmicrobiologia.org.br||mbmartin@usp.br1678-44051517-8382opendoar:2007-03-01T00:00Brazilian Journal of Microbiology - Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparision of the BAX® System with an in-house MSRV method for the detection of Salmonella in chicken carcasses and pork meat |
title |
Comparision of the BAX® System with an in-house MSRV method for the detection of Salmonella in chicken carcasses and pork meat |
spellingShingle |
Comparision of the BAX® System with an in-house MSRV method for the detection of Salmonella in chicken carcasses and pork meat Franchin,Paulo R. BAX® System MSRV method Salmonella chicken pork meat |
title_short |
Comparision of the BAX® System with an in-house MSRV method for the detection of Salmonella in chicken carcasses and pork meat |
title_full |
Comparision of the BAX® System with an in-house MSRV method for the detection of Salmonella in chicken carcasses and pork meat |
title_fullStr |
Comparision of the BAX® System with an in-house MSRV method for the detection of Salmonella in chicken carcasses and pork meat |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparision of the BAX® System with an in-house MSRV method for the detection of Salmonella in chicken carcasses and pork meat |
title_sort |
Comparision of the BAX® System with an in-house MSRV method for the detection of Salmonella in chicken carcasses and pork meat |
author |
Franchin,Paulo R. |
author_facet |
Franchin,Paulo R. Ogliari,Paulo J. Andrade,Dalton F. Chiapinoto,Maura Lemos,Giovana Rebelatto,Marina Silva,Ivair G. da Batista,Cleide R.V. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ogliari,Paulo J. Andrade,Dalton F. Chiapinoto,Maura Lemos,Giovana Rebelatto,Marina Silva,Ivair G. da Batista,Cleide R.V. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Franchin,Paulo R. Ogliari,Paulo J. Andrade,Dalton F. Chiapinoto,Maura Lemos,Giovana Rebelatto,Marina Silva,Ivair G. da Batista,Cleide R.V. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
BAX® System MSRV method Salmonella chicken pork meat |
topic |
BAX® System MSRV method Salmonella chicken pork meat |
description |
A study was performed to compare the analytical procedure of the BAX® System for Salmonella PCR assay with the Modified Semi-Solid Rappaport-Vassiliadis (MSRV) method, for the detection of Salmonella in naturally contaminated chicken carcass samples (n = 762) and raw pork meat (n = 566). The chicken carcasses samples were collected during slaughtering after defeathering or immediately after evisceration and the raw pork meat collected from the deboned head of recently slaughtered pigs and others deboned raw fresh pork meat. The BAX® System detected 134 Salmonella-positive samples in chicken carcasses and 145 samples in pork meat, while the MSRV method isolated 142 and 144 Salmonella-positive samples, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the two methods for chicken carcasses and pork meat, according to McNemar test at the 5% level. |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822006000400022 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822006000400022 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1517-83822006000400022 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology v.37 n.4 2006 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Microbiology instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM) instacron:SBM |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM) |
instacron_str |
SBM |
institution |
SBM |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology - Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bjm@sbmicrobiologia.org.br||mbmartin@usp.br |
_version_ |
1752122200922521600 |