Comparision of the BAX® System with an in-house MSRV method for the detection of Salmonella in chicken carcasses and pork meat

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Franchin,Paulo R.
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Ogliari,Paulo J., Andrade,Dalton F., Chiapinoto,Maura, Lemos,Giovana, Rebelatto,Marina, Silva,Ivair G. da, Batista,Cleide R.V.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822006000400022
Resumo: A study was performed to compare the analytical procedure of the BAX® System for Salmonella PCR assay with the Modified Semi-Solid Rappaport-Vassiliadis (MSRV) method, for the detection of Salmonella in naturally contaminated chicken carcass samples (n = 762) and raw pork meat (n = 566). The chicken carcasses samples were collected during slaughtering after defeathering or immediately after evisceration and the raw pork meat collected from the deboned head of recently slaughtered pigs and others deboned raw fresh pork meat. The BAX® System detected 134 Salmonella-positive samples in chicken carcasses and 145 samples in pork meat, while the MSRV method isolated 142 and 144 Salmonella-positive samples, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the two methods for chicken carcasses and pork meat, according to McNemar test at the 5% level.
id SBM-1_2ee5b91275b5095a89c712c70b259ab7
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1517-83822006000400022
network_acronym_str SBM-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
repository_id_str
spelling Comparision of the BAX® System with an in-house MSRV method for the detection of Salmonella in chicken carcasses and pork meatBAX® SystemMSRV methodSalmonellachickenpork meatA study was performed to compare the analytical procedure of the BAX® System for Salmonella PCR assay with the Modified Semi-Solid Rappaport-Vassiliadis (MSRV) method, for the detection of Salmonella in naturally contaminated chicken carcass samples (n = 762) and raw pork meat (n = 566). The chicken carcasses samples were collected during slaughtering after defeathering or immediately after evisceration and the raw pork meat collected from the deboned head of recently slaughtered pigs and others deboned raw fresh pork meat. The BAX® System detected 134 Salmonella-positive samples in chicken carcasses and 145 samples in pork meat, while the MSRV method isolated 142 and 144 Salmonella-positive samples, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the two methods for chicken carcasses and pork meat, according to McNemar test at the 5% level.Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia2006-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822006000400022Brazilian Journal of Microbiology v.37 n.4 2006reponame:Brazilian Journal of Microbiologyinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM)instacron:SBM10.1590/S1517-83822006000400022info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFranchin,Paulo R.Ogliari,Paulo J.Andrade,Dalton F.Chiapinoto,MauraLemos,GiovanaRebelatto,MarinaSilva,Ivair G. daBatista,Cleide R.V.eng2007-03-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1517-83822006000400022Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bjm/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjm@sbmicrobiologia.org.br||mbmartin@usp.br1678-44051517-8382opendoar:2007-03-01T00:00Brazilian Journal of Microbiology - Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparision of the BAX® System with an in-house MSRV method for the detection of Salmonella in chicken carcasses and pork meat
title Comparision of the BAX® System with an in-house MSRV method for the detection of Salmonella in chicken carcasses and pork meat
spellingShingle Comparision of the BAX® System with an in-house MSRV method for the detection of Salmonella in chicken carcasses and pork meat
Franchin,Paulo R.
BAX® System
MSRV method
Salmonella
chicken
pork meat
title_short Comparision of the BAX® System with an in-house MSRV method for the detection of Salmonella in chicken carcasses and pork meat
title_full Comparision of the BAX® System with an in-house MSRV method for the detection of Salmonella in chicken carcasses and pork meat
title_fullStr Comparision of the BAX® System with an in-house MSRV method for the detection of Salmonella in chicken carcasses and pork meat
title_full_unstemmed Comparision of the BAX® System with an in-house MSRV method for the detection of Salmonella in chicken carcasses and pork meat
title_sort Comparision of the BAX® System with an in-house MSRV method for the detection of Salmonella in chicken carcasses and pork meat
author Franchin,Paulo R.
author_facet Franchin,Paulo R.
Ogliari,Paulo J.
Andrade,Dalton F.
Chiapinoto,Maura
Lemos,Giovana
Rebelatto,Marina
Silva,Ivair G. da
Batista,Cleide R.V.
author_role author
author2 Ogliari,Paulo J.
Andrade,Dalton F.
Chiapinoto,Maura
Lemos,Giovana
Rebelatto,Marina
Silva,Ivair G. da
Batista,Cleide R.V.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Franchin,Paulo R.
Ogliari,Paulo J.
Andrade,Dalton F.
Chiapinoto,Maura
Lemos,Giovana
Rebelatto,Marina
Silva,Ivair G. da
Batista,Cleide R.V.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv BAX® System
MSRV method
Salmonella
chicken
pork meat
topic BAX® System
MSRV method
Salmonella
chicken
pork meat
description A study was performed to compare the analytical procedure of the BAX® System for Salmonella PCR assay with the Modified Semi-Solid Rappaport-Vassiliadis (MSRV) method, for the detection of Salmonella in naturally contaminated chicken carcass samples (n = 762) and raw pork meat (n = 566). The chicken carcasses samples were collected during slaughtering after defeathering or immediately after evisceration and the raw pork meat collected from the deboned head of recently slaughtered pigs and others deboned raw fresh pork meat. The BAX® System detected 134 Salmonella-positive samples in chicken carcasses and 145 samples in pork meat, while the MSRV method isolated 142 and 144 Salmonella-positive samples, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the two methods for chicken carcasses and pork meat, according to McNemar test at the 5% level.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822006000400022
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822006000400022
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1517-83822006000400022
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Microbiology v.37 n.4 2006
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM)
instacron:SBM
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM)
instacron_str SBM
institution SBM
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
collection Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Microbiology - Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjm@sbmicrobiologia.org.br||mbmartin@usp.br
_version_ 1752122200922521600