Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility of commonly clinically significant isolates before and after the interventions on surgical prophylactic antibiotics (SPAs) in Shanghai

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Wang,Su
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Han,Li-Zhong, Ni,Yu-Xing, Zhang,Yi-Bo, Wang,Qun, Shi,Da-Ke, Li,Wen-Hui, Wang,Yi-Chen, Mi,Chen-Rong
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822018000300552
Resumo: Abstract Surveillances and interventions on antibiotics use have been suggested to improve serious drug-resistance worldwide. Since 2007, our hospital have proposed many measures for regulating surgical prophylactic antibiotics (carbapenems, third gen. cephalosporins, vancomycin, etc.) prescribing practices, like formulary restriction or replacement for surgical prophylactic antibiotics and timely feedback. To assess the impacts on drug-resistance after interventions, we enrolled infected patients in 2006 (pre-intervention period) and 2014 (post-intervention period) in a tertiary hospital in Shanghai. Proportions of targeted pathogens were analyzed: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. (VRE), imipenem-resistant Escherichia coli (IREC), imipenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (IRKP), imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (IRAB) and imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (IRPA) isolates. Rates of them were estimated and compared between Surgical Department, ICU and Internal Department during two periods. The total proportions of targeted isolates in Surgical Department (62.44%, 2006; 64.09%, 2014) were more than those in ICU (46.13%, 2006; 50.99%, 2014) and in Internal Department (44.54%, 2006; 51.20%, 2014). Only MRSA has decreased significantly (80.48%, 2006; 55.97%, 2014) (p < 0.0001). The percentages of VRE and IREC in 3 departments were all <15%, and the slightest change were also both observed in Surgical Department (VRE: 0.76%, 2006; 2.03%, 2014) (IREC: 2.69%, 2006; 2.63%, 2014). The interventions on surgical prophylactic antibiotics can be effective for improving resistance; antimicrobial stewardship must be combined with infection control practices.
id SBM-1_7ee435df91275a7a2c76c33740ea880e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1517-83822018000300552
network_acronym_str SBM-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
repository_id_str
spelling Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility of commonly clinically significant isolates before and after the interventions on surgical prophylactic antibiotics (SPAs) in ShanghaiSurgical prophylactic antibioticsInterventionResistanceNosocomial infectionAbstract Surveillances and interventions on antibiotics use have been suggested to improve serious drug-resistance worldwide. Since 2007, our hospital have proposed many measures for regulating surgical prophylactic antibiotics (carbapenems, third gen. cephalosporins, vancomycin, etc.) prescribing practices, like formulary restriction or replacement for surgical prophylactic antibiotics and timely feedback. To assess the impacts on drug-resistance after interventions, we enrolled infected patients in 2006 (pre-intervention period) and 2014 (post-intervention period) in a tertiary hospital in Shanghai. Proportions of targeted pathogens were analyzed: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. (VRE), imipenem-resistant Escherichia coli (IREC), imipenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (IRKP), imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (IRAB) and imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (IRPA) isolates. Rates of them were estimated and compared between Surgical Department, ICU and Internal Department during two periods. The total proportions of targeted isolates in Surgical Department (62.44%, 2006; 64.09%, 2014) were more than those in ICU (46.13%, 2006; 50.99%, 2014) and in Internal Department (44.54%, 2006; 51.20%, 2014). Only MRSA has decreased significantly (80.48%, 2006; 55.97%, 2014) (p < 0.0001). The percentages of VRE and IREC in 3 departments were all <15%, and the slightest change were also both observed in Surgical Department (VRE: 0.76%, 2006; 2.03%, 2014) (IREC: 2.69%, 2006; 2.63%, 2014). The interventions on surgical prophylactic antibiotics can be effective for improving resistance; antimicrobial stewardship must be combined with infection control practices.Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia2018-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822018000300552Brazilian Journal of Microbiology v.49 n.3 2018reponame:Brazilian Journal of Microbiologyinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM)instacron:SBM10.1016/j.bjm.2017.12.004info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWang,SuHan,Li-ZhongNi,Yu-XingZhang,Yi-BoWang,QunShi,Da-KeLi,Wen-HuiWang,Yi-ChenMi,Chen-Rongeng2018-08-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1517-83822018000300552Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bjm/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjm@sbmicrobiologia.org.br||mbmartin@usp.br1678-44051517-8382opendoar:2018-08-03T00:00Brazilian Journal of Microbiology - Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility of commonly clinically significant isolates before and after the interventions on surgical prophylactic antibiotics (SPAs) in Shanghai
title Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility of commonly clinically significant isolates before and after the interventions on surgical prophylactic antibiotics (SPAs) in Shanghai
spellingShingle Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility of commonly clinically significant isolates before and after the interventions on surgical prophylactic antibiotics (SPAs) in Shanghai
Wang,Su
Surgical prophylactic antibiotics
Intervention
Resistance
Nosocomial infection
title_short Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility of commonly clinically significant isolates before and after the interventions on surgical prophylactic antibiotics (SPAs) in Shanghai
title_full Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility of commonly clinically significant isolates before and after the interventions on surgical prophylactic antibiotics (SPAs) in Shanghai
title_fullStr Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility of commonly clinically significant isolates before and after the interventions on surgical prophylactic antibiotics (SPAs) in Shanghai
title_full_unstemmed Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility of commonly clinically significant isolates before and after the interventions on surgical prophylactic antibiotics (SPAs) in Shanghai
title_sort Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility of commonly clinically significant isolates before and after the interventions on surgical prophylactic antibiotics (SPAs) in Shanghai
author Wang,Su
author_facet Wang,Su
Han,Li-Zhong
Ni,Yu-Xing
Zhang,Yi-Bo
Wang,Qun
Shi,Da-Ke
Li,Wen-Hui
Wang,Yi-Chen
Mi,Chen-Rong
author_role author
author2 Han,Li-Zhong
Ni,Yu-Xing
Zhang,Yi-Bo
Wang,Qun
Shi,Da-Ke
Li,Wen-Hui
Wang,Yi-Chen
Mi,Chen-Rong
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Wang,Su
Han,Li-Zhong
Ni,Yu-Xing
Zhang,Yi-Bo
Wang,Qun
Shi,Da-Ke
Li,Wen-Hui
Wang,Yi-Chen
Mi,Chen-Rong
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Surgical prophylactic antibiotics
Intervention
Resistance
Nosocomial infection
topic Surgical prophylactic antibiotics
Intervention
Resistance
Nosocomial infection
description Abstract Surveillances and interventions on antibiotics use have been suggested to improve serious drug-resistance worldwide. Since 2007, our hospital have proposed many measures for regulating surgical prophylactic antibiotics (carbapenems, third gen. cephalosporins, vancomycin, etc.) prescribing practices, like formulary restriction or replacement for surgical prophylactic antibiotics and timely feedback. To assess the impacts on drug-resistance after interventions, we enrolled infected patients in 2006 (pre-intervention period) and 2014 (post-intervention period) in a tertiary hospital in Shanghai. Proportions of targeted pathogens were analyzed: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. (VRE), imipenem-resistant Escherichia coli (IREC), imipenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (IRKP), imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (IRAB) and imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (IRPA) isolates. Rates of them were estimated and compared between Surgical Department, ICU and Internal Department during two periods. The total proportions of targeted isolates in Surgical Department (62.44%, 2006; 64.09%, 2014) were more than those in ICU (46.13%, 2006; 50.99%, 2014) and in Internal Department (44.54%, 2006; 51.20%, 2014). Only MRSA has decreased significantly (80.48%, 2006; 55.97%, 2014) (p < 0.0001). The percentages of VRE and IREC in 3 departments were all <15%, and the slightest change were also both observed in Surgical Department (VRE: 0.76%, 2006; 2.03%, 2014) (IREC: 2.69%, 2006; 2.63%, 2014). The interventions on surgical prophylactic antibiotics can be effective for improving resistance; antimicrobial stewardship must be combined with infection control practices.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822018000300552
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822018000300552
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjm.2017.12.004
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Microbiology v.49 n.3 2018
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM)
instacron:SBM
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM)
instacron_str SBM
institution SBM
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
collection Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Microbiology - Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjm@sbmicrobiologia.org.br||mbmartin@usp.br
_version_ 1752122209706442752