PROTOCOL FOR ASSESSING THE PRECISION OF PARALYMPIC BOCCIA PLAYERS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista brasileira de medicina do esporte (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-86922021000600616 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Introduction: Although Paralympic boccia is an up-and-coming sport, demanding more and requiring higher levels of performance from athletes, protocols are not available for evaluating its indicators. Objective: To develop and verify the applicability of a new protocol for assessing the precision of athletes of the sport. Methods: Two targets with two different resolutions (0.5 [RES-0.5] and 1.0 [RES-1.0] points) were developed, graduated from 1 to 7. The protocol consists of placing the targets at 6 locations on the court, and each athlete makes two shots for each target. The best results are considered, from which total precision (TotalP), short precision (SP), medium precision (MP) and long precision (LP) are extracted. Nine players participated in the application of the protocol. The indicators of both targets were compared and verified using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEm), bias (Bland-Altman) and minimum detectable difference (MDD). Results: Only for LP were there differences between targets (RES-0.5: 9.111 versus RES-1.0: 7.167; p <0.05), while TotalP, SP and MP did not show any significant differences (RES-0.5: 23.11 versus RES-1.0: 25.39; RES-0.5: 18.22 versus RES-1.0: 17.78; RES-0.5: 9.11 versus RES-1.0: 12.44, respectively). In addition, the RES-0.5 target obtained better concordance results (ICC = 0.73; SEm = 3.45; bias = -0.5938; MDD = 8.00), while the RES-1.0 target obtained lower values (CCI = 0.53; SEm = 6.28; bias = 0.3750; MDD = 14.56). Conclusions: The proposed protocol presents excellent applicability results. However, a larger sample of athletes including more details on specific precision indicators should be performed. Level of evidence II; Prospective comparative study. |
id |
SBMEE-1_b1e5fc0733e9c2c46a0e3bd600ad409a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1517-86922021000600616 |
network_acronym_str |
SBMEE-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista brasileira de medicina do esporte (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
PROTOCOL FOR ASSESSING THE PRECISION OF PARALYMPIC BOCCIA PLAYERSDisabled personsPhysical education and trainingAthletic performanceSports medicineABSTRACT Introduction: Although Paralympic boccia is an up-and-coming sport, demanding more and requiring higher levels of performance from athletes, protocols are not available for evaluating its indicators. Objective: To develop and verify the applicability of a new protocol for assessing the precision of athletes of the sport. Methods: Two targets with two different resolutions (0.5 [RES-0.5] and 1.0 [RES-1.0] points) were developed, graduated from 1 to 7. The protocol consists of placing the targets at 6 locations on the court, and each athlete makes two shots for each target. The best results are considered, from which total precision (TotalP), short precision (SP), medium precision (MP) and long precision (LP) are extracted. Nine players participated in the application of the protocol. The indicators of both targets were compared and verified using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEm), bias (Bland-Altman) and minimum detectable difference (MDD). Results: Only for LP were there differences between targets (RES-0.5: 9.111 versus RES-1.0: 7.167; p <0.05), while TotalP, SP and MP did not show any significant differences (RES-0.5: 23.11 versus RES-1.0: 25.39; RES-0.5: 18.22 versus RES-1.0: 17.78; RES-0.5: 9.11 versus RES-1.0: 12.44, respectively). In addition, the RES-0.5 target obtained better concordance results (ICC = 0.73; SEm = 3.45; bias = -0.5938; MDD = 8.00), while the RES-1.0 target obtained lower values (CCI = 0.53; SEm = 6.28; bias = 0.3750; MDD = 14.56). Conclusions: The proposed protocol presents excellent applicability results. However, a larger sample of athletes including more details on specific precision indicators should be performed. Level of evidence II; Prospective comparative study.Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do Esporte2021-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-86922021000600616Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte v.27 n.6 2021reponame:Revista brasileira de medicina do esporte (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do Esporte (SBMEE)instacron:SBMEE10.1590/1517-8692202127062020_0039info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira,José Igor Vasconcelos deOliveira,Lúcia Inês Guedes Leite deCosta,Manoel da CunhaArruda,Sidcley Félix deOliveira,Saulo Fernandes Melo deeng2021-11-11T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1517-86922021000600616Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbmeONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista@medicinadoesporte.org.br1806-99401517-8692opendoar:2021-11-11T00:00Revista brasileira de medicina do esporte (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do Esporte (SBMEE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
PROTOCOL FOR ASSESSING THE PRECISION OF PARALYMPIC BOCCIA PLAYERS |
title |
PROTOCOL FOR ASSESSING THE PRECISION OF PARALYMPIC BOCCIA PLAYERS |
spellingShingle |
PROTOCOL FOR ASSESSING THE PRECISION OF PARALYMPIC BOCCIA PLAYERS Oliveira,José Igor Vasconcelos de Disabled persons Physical education and training Athletic performance Sports medicine |
title_short |
PROTOCOL FOR ASSESSING THE PRECISION OF PARALYMPIC BOCCIA PLAYERS |
title_full |
PROTOCOL FOR ASSESSING THE PRECISION OF PARALYMPIC BOCCIA PLAYERS |
title_fullStr |
PROTOCOL FOR ASSESSING THE PRECISION OF PARALYMPIC BOCCIA PLAYERS |
title_full_unstemmed |
PROTOCOL FOR ASSESSING THE PRECISION OF PARALYMPIC BOCCIA PLAYERS |
title_sort |
PROTOCOL FOR ASSESSING THE PRECISION OF PARALYMPIC BOCCIA PLAYERS |
author |
Oliveira,José Igor Vasconcelos de |
author_facet |
Oliveira,José Igor Vasconcelos de Oliveira,Lúcia Inês Guedes Leite de Costa,Manoel da Cunha Arruda,Sidcley Félix de Oliveira,Saulo Fernandes Melo de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira,Lúcia Inês Guedes Leite de Costa,Manoel da Cunha Arruda,Sidcley Félix de Oliveira,Saulo Fernandes Melo de |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira,José Igor Vasconcelos de Oliveira,Lúcia Inês Guedes Leite de Costa,Manoel da Cunha Arruda,Sidcley Félix de Oliveira,Saulo Fernandes Melo de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Disabled persons Physical education and training Athletic performance Sports medicine |
topic |
Disabled persons Physical education and training Athletic performance Sports medicine |
description |
ABSTRACT Introduction: Although Paralympic boccia is an up-and-coming sport, demanding more and requiring higher levels of performance from athletes, protocols are not available for evaluating its indicators. Objective: To develop and verify the applicability of a new protocol for assessing the precision of athletes of the sport. Methods: Two targets with two different resolutions (0.5 [RES-0.5] and 1.0 [RES-1.0] points) were developed, graduated from 1 to 7. The protocol consists of placing the targets at 6 locations on the court, and each athlete makes two shots for each target. The best results are considered, from which total precision (TotalP), short precision (SP), medium precision (MP) and long precision (LP) are extracted. Nine players participated in the application of the protocol. The indicators of both targets were compared and verified using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEm), bias (Bland-Altman) and minimum detectable difference (MDD). Results: Only for LP were there differences between targets (RES-0.5: 9.111 versus RES-1.0: 7.167; p <0.05), while TotalP, SP and MP did not show any significant differences (RES-0.5: 23.11 versus RES-1.0: 25.39; RES-0.5: 18.22 versus RES-1.0: 17.78; RES-0.5: 9.11 versus RES-1.0: 12.44, respectively). In addition, the RES-0.5 target obtained better concordance results (ICC = 0.73; SEm = 3.45; bias = -0.5938; MDD = 8.00), while the RES-1.0 target obtained lower values (CCI = 0.53; SEm = 6.28; bias = 0.3750; MDD = 14.56). Conclusions: The proposed protocol presents excellent applicability results. However, a larger sample of athletes including more details on specific precision indicators should be performed. Level of evidence II; Prospective comparative study. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-86922021000600616 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-86922021000600616 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1517-8692202127062020_0039 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do Esporte |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do Esporte |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte v.27 n.6 2021 reponame:Revista brasileira de medicina do esporte (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do Esporte (SBMEE) instacron:SBMEE |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do Esporte (SBMEE) |
instacron_str |
SBMEE |
institution |
SBMEE |
reponame_str |
Revista brasileira de medicina do esporte (Online) |
collection |
Revista brasileira de medicina do esporte (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista brasileira de medicina do esporte (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do Esporte (SBMEE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revista@medicinadoesporte.org.br |
_version_ |
1752122237995974656 |