QUADRICEPS AUTOGRAFT IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista brasileira de medicina do esporte (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-86922020000100058 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament injury is one of the most prevalent musculoskeletal injuries. Therefore, several surgical techniques and graft types have been described for its reconstruction. Autologous hamstring tendon graft is one of the most frequently used, but use of the quadriceps tendon graft has gained prominence in recent years. Objective: To review the literature to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft versus hamstring tendon (HT) autograft. Methods: A literature review was conducted through PubMed to locate studies (Level of evidence I-III) comparing the outcomes of the QT autograft vs. the HT autograft in patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction. Patients were assessed on the basis of re-rupture rate, ligament instability, patient-reported outcome scores, previous pain, and isokinetic tests. Results: Six studies were selected according to inclusion criteria. A total of 481 patients were evaluated, 243 in the QT group and 238 in the HT group. The total re-rupture rate was 1.6% (8 of 481), with 6 in the HT group and 2 in the QT group, but with no statistical difference between groups. One study found increased ligament instability in the HT group and another study found greater instability in the QT group, both with statistical significance. Regarding the patient-reported functional scores, only 01 study found statistical difference, with better results in the QT group. There was no difference in previous pain between groups in the selected studies. Regarding the isokinetic test, one study found a difference in flexor force in the HT group (p <0.01), with no difference in extensor force, while another two studies found an increased extensor force deficit in the QT group within up to 01 year of follow-up. The flexor/ extensor muscle strength ratio was higher in the QT group in both studies. Conclusion: ACL reconstruction with QT graft presents re-rupture rates, ligament instability, functional scores and donor site morbidity that are similar to the HT graft, in addition to preserving greater flexor force in proportion to extensor force. Level of evidence: IV; Review study. |
id |
SBMEE-1_f91a11654201497a0bda0f6d3dca3fe8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1517-86922020000100058 |
network_acronym_str |
SBMEE-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista brasileira de medicina do esporte (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
QUADRICEPS AUTOGRAFT IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEWAnterior cruciate ligament reconstructionQuadriceps muscleHamstring tendonsTransplantation autologousABSTRACT Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament injury is one of the most prevalent musculoskeletal injuries. Therefore, several surgical techniques and graft types have been described for its reconstruction. Autologous hamstring tendon graft is one of the most frequently used, but use of the quadriceps tendon graft has gained prominence in recent years. Objective: To review the literature to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft versus hamstring tendon (HT) autograft. Methods: A literature review was conducted through PubMed to locate studies (Level of evidence I-III) comparing the outcomes of the QT autograft vs. the HT autograft in patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction. Patients were assessed on the basis of re-rupture rate, ligament instability, patient-reported outcome scores, previous pain, and isokinetic tests. Results: Six studies were selected according to inclusion criteria. A total of 481 patients were evaluated, 243 in the QT group and 238 in the HT group. The total re-rupture rate was 1.6% (8 of 481), with 6 in the HT group and 2 in the QT group, but with no statistical difference between groups. One study found increased ligament instability in the HT group and another study found greater instability in the QT group, both with statistical significance. Regarding the patient-reported functional scores, only 01 study found statistical difference, with better results in the QT group. There was no difference in previous pain between groups in the selected studies. Regarding the isokinetic test, one study found a difference in flexor force in the HT group (p <0.01), with no difference in extensor force, while another two studies found an increased extensor force deficit in the QT group within up to 01 year of follow-up. The flexor/ extensor muscle strength ratio was higher in the QT group in both studies. Conclusion: ACL reconstruction with QT graft presents re-rupture rates, ligament instability, functional scores and donor site morbidity that are similar to the HT graft, in addition to preserving greater flexor force in proportion to extensor force. Level of evidence: IV; Review study.Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do Esporte2020-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-86922020000100058Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte v.26 n.1 2020reponame:Revista brasileira de medicina do esporte (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do Esporte (SBMEE)instacron:SBMEE10.1590/1517-869220202601214002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSalas,Victor Eduardo RomanOliveira,Diego Escudeiro deLima,Marcos Vaz deDuarte Junior,AiresGuglielmetti,Luiz Gabriel BetoniCury,Ricardo de Paula LeiteJorge,Pedro Bacheseng2020-01-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1517-86922020000100058Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbmeONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista@medicinadoesporte.org.br1806-99401517-8692opendoar:2020-01-09T00:00Revista brasileira de medicina do esporte (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do Esporte (SBMEE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
QUADRICEPS AUTOGRAFT IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW |
title |
QUADRICEPS AUTOGRAFT IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW |
spellingShingle |
QUADRICEPS AUTOGRAFT IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW Salas,Victor Eduardo Roman Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Quadriceps muscle Hamstring tendons Transplantation autologous |
title_short |
QUADRICEPS AUTOGRAFT IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW |
title_full |
QUADRICEPS AUTOGRAFT IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW |
title_fullStr |
QUADRICEPS AUTOGRAFT IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW |
title_full_unstemmed |
QUADRICEPS AUTOGRAFT IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW |
title_sort |
QUADRICEPS AUTOGRAFT IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW |
author |
Salas,Victor Eduardo Roman |
author_facet |
Salas,Victor Eduardo Roman Oliveira,Diego Escudeiro de Lima,Marcos Vaz de Duarte Junior,Aires Guglielmetti,Luiz Gabriel Betoni Cury,Ricardo de Paula Leite Jorge,Pedro Baches |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira,Diego Escudeiro de Lima,Marcos Vaz de Duarte Junior,Aires Guglielmetti,Luiz Gabriel Betoni Cury,Ricardo de Paula Leite Jorge,Pedro Baches |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Salas,Victor Eduardo Roman Oliveira,Diego Escudeiro de Lima,Marcos Vaz de Duarte Junior,Aires Guglielmetti,Luiz Gabriel Betoni Cury,Ricardo de Paula Leite Jorge,Pedro Baches |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Quadriceps muscle Hamstring tendons Transplantation autologous |
topic |
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Quadriceps muscle Hamstring tendons Transplantation autologous |
description |
ABSTRACT Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament injury is one of the most prevalent musculoskeletal injuries. Therefore, several surgical techniques and graft types have been described for its reconstruction. Autologous hamstring tendon graft is one of the most frequently used, but use of the quadriceps tendon graft has gained prominence in recent years. Objective: To review the literature to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft versus hamstring tendon (HT) autograft. Methods: A literature review was conducted through PubMed to locate studies (Level of evidence I-III) comparing the outcomes of the QT autograft vs. the HT autograft in patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction. Patients were assessed on the basis of re-rupture rate, ligament instability, patient-reported outcome scores, previous pain, and isokinetic tests. Results: Six studies were selected according to inclusion criteria. A total of 481 patients were evaluated, 243 in the QT group and 238 in the HT group. The total re-rupture rate was 1.6% (8 of 481), with 6 in the HT group and 2 in the QT group, but with no statistical difference between groups. One study found increased ligament instability in the HT group and another study found greater instability in the QT group, both with statistical significance. Regarding the patient-reported functional scores, only 01 study found statistical difference, with better results in the QT group. There was no difference in previous pain between groups in the selected studies. Regarding the isokinetic test, one study found a difference in flexor force in the HT group (p <0.01), with no difference in extensor force, while another two studies found an increased extensor force deficit in the QT group within up to 01 year of follow-up. The flexor/ extensor muscle strength ratio was higher in the QT group in both studies. Conclusion: ACL reconstruction with QT graft presents re-rupture rates, ligament instability, functional scores and donor site morbidity that are similar to the HT graft, in addition to preserving greater flexor force in proportion to extensor force. Level of evidence: IV; Review study. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-02-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-86922020000100058 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-86922020000100058 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1517-869220202601214002 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do Esporte |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do Esporte |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte v.26 n.1 2020 reponame:Revista brasileira de medicina do esporte (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do Esporte (SBMEE) instacron:SBMEE |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do Esporte (SBMEE) |
instacron_str |
SBMEE |
institution |
SBMEE |
reponame_str |
Revista brasileira de medicina do esporte (Online) |
collection |
Revista brasileira de medicina do esporte (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista brasileira de medicina do esporte (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do Esporte (SBMEE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revista@medicinadoesporte.org.br |
_version_ |
1752122237103636480 |