Comparison and Combination of Techniques for Determining the Parameters of a Magnetic Hysteresis Model

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mendes,Filomena B. R.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Leite,Jean V., Batistela,Nelson J., Sadowski,Nelson, Suárez,Fredy M. S., Barros Neto,João P. de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of Microwaves. Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic Applications
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-10742019000300408
Resumo: Abstract The Jiles-Atherton scalar hysteresis model presents five parameters used to represent the material tested and used to calculate the magnetic losses. This article presents a comparative analysis of the performance of two methods of identifying these parameters. In the first method, the equations of Jiles-Atherton were assembled into a single non-linear ordinary differential equation as a function of the variables of interest. An algebraic system of five equations with five unknowns is obtained by evaluating the non-linear ordinary differential equation in five points belonging to the branch of the experimental hysteresis loop. The parameters are obtained by solving this system of equations using the method of Non-Linear Least Squares (NLLS). In the second method, the inverse model of Jiles-Atherton is used to calculate the magnetic field H from the experimental values of magnetic induction B. Using the method of genetic algorithms (MGA), the objective function given by the sum of the relative error of calculated magnetic field and experimental magnetic field along the hysteresis loop is minimized. To validate methods the experimental curves were compared with calculated ones. When applying the methods, it was verified that NLLS besides providing more accurate results, it is faster when compared to MGA. In the MGA the convergence of the calculated magnitudes to the experimental magnitudes improves when one of the chromosomes of the initial population is the solution obtained applying NLLS.
id SBMO-1_5321d3ba2d6a947b4db0cd7fcbb87b22
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2179-10742019000300408
network_acronym_str SBMO-1
network_name_str Journal of Microwaves. Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic Applications
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison and Combination of Techniques for Determining the Parameters of a Magnetic Hysteresis ModelMagnetic hysteresismagnetic materialsmethod of genetic algorithmsnon-linear least squares methodAbstract The Jiles-Atherton scalar hysteresis model presents five parameters used to represent the material tested and used to calculate the magnetic losses. This article presents a comparative analysis of the performance of two methods of identifying these parameters. In the first method, the equations of Jiles-Atherton were assembled into a single non-linear ordinary differential equation as a function of the variables of interest. An algebraic system of five equations with five unknowns is obtained by evaluating the non-linear ordinary differential equation in five points belonging to the branch of the experimental hysteresis loop. The parameters are obtained by solving this system of equations using the method of Non-Linear Least Squares (NLLS). In the second method, the inverse model of Jiles-Atherton is used to calculate the magnetic field H from the experimental values of magnetic induction B. Using the method of genetic algorithms (MGA), the objective function given by the sum of the relative error of calculated magnetic field and experimental magnetic field along the hysteresis loop is minimized. To validate methods the experimental curves were compared with calculated ones. When applying the methods, it was verified that NLLS besides providing more accurate results, it is faster when compared to MGA. In the MGA the convergence of the calculated magnitudes to the experimental magnitudes improves when one of the chromosomes of the initial population is the solution obtained applying NLLS.Sociedade Brasileira de Microondas e Optoeletrônica e Sociedade Brasileira de Eletromagnetismo2019-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-10742019000300408Journal of Microwaves, Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic Applications v.18 n.3 2019reponame:Journal of Microwaves. Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic Applicationsinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Microondas e Optoeletrônica (SBMO)instacron:SBMO10.1590/2179-10742019v18i31513info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMendes,Filomena B. R.Leite,Jean V.Batistela,Nelson J.Sadowski,NelsonSuárez,Fredy M. S.Barros Neto,João P. deeng2019-09-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2179-10742019000300408Revistahttp://www.jmoe.org/index.php/jmoe/indexONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||editor_jmoe@sbmo.org.br2179-10742179-1074opendoar:2019-09-09T00:00Journal of Microwaves. Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic Applications - Sociedade Brasileira de Microondas e Optoeletrônica (SBMO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison and Combination of Techniques for Determining the Parameters of a Magnetic Hysteresis Model
title Comparison and Combination of Techniques for Determining the Parameters of a Magnetic Hysteresis Model
spellingShingle Comparison and Combination of Techniques for Determining the Parameters of a Magnetic Hysteresis Model
Mendes,Filomena B. R.
Magnetic hysteresis
magnetic materials
method of genetic algorithms
non-linear least squares method
title_short Comparison and Combination of Techniques for Determining the Parameters of a Magnetic Hysteresis Model
title_full Comparison and Combination of Techniques for Determining the Parameters of a Magnetic Hysteresis Model
title_fullStr Comparison and Combination of Techniques for Determining the Parameters of a Magnetic Hysteresis Model
title_full_unstemmed Comparison and Combination of Techniques for Determining the Parameters of a Magnetic Hysteresis Model
title_sort Comparison and Combination of Techniques for Determining the Parameters of a Magnetic Hysteresis Model
author Mendes,Filomena B. R.
author_facet Mendes,Filomena B. R.
Leite,Jean V.
Batistela,Nelson J.
Sadowski,Nelson
Suárez,Fredy M. S.
Barros Neto,João P. de
author_role author
author2 Leite,Jean V.
Batistela,Nelson J.
Sadowski,Nelson
Suárez,Fredy M. S.
Barros Neto,João P. de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mendes,Filomena B. R.
Leite,Jean V.
Batistela,Nelson J.
Sadowski,Nelson
Suárez,Fredy M. S.
Barros Neto,João P. de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Magnetic hysteresis
magnetic materials
method of genetic algorithms
non-linear least squares method
topic Magnetic hysteresis
magnetic materials
method of genetic algorithms
non-linear least squares method
description Abstract The Jiles-Atherton scalar hysteresis model presents five parameters used to represent the material tested and used to calculate the magnetic losses. This article presents a comparative analysis of the performance of two methods of identifying these parameters. In the first method, the equations of Jiles-Atherton were assembled into a single non-linear ordinary differential equation as a function of the variables of interest. An algebraic system of five equations with five unknowns is obtained by evaluating the non-linear ordinary differential equation in five points belonging to the branch of the experimental hysteresis loop. The parameters are obtained by solving this system of equations using the method of Non-Linear Least Squares (NLLS). In the second method, the inverse model of Jiles-Atherton is used to calculate the magnetic field H from the experimental values of magnetic induction B. Using the method of genetic algorithms (MGA), the objective function given by the sum of the relative error of calculated magnetic field and experimental magnetic field along the hysteresis loop is minimized. To validate methods the experimental curves were compared with calculated ones. When applying the methods, it was verified that NLLS besides providing more accurate results, it is faster when compared to MGA. In the MGA the convergence of the calculated magnitudes to the experimental magnitudes improves when one of the chromosomes of the initial population is the solution obtained applying NLLS.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-07-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-10742019000300408
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-10742019000300408
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2179-10742019v18i31513
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Microondas e Optoeletrônica e Sociedade Brasileira de Eletromagnetismo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Microondas e Optoeletrônica e Sociedade Brasileira de Eletromagnetismo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Microwaves, Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic Applications v.18 n.3 2019
reponame:Journal of Microwaves. Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic Applications
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Microondas e Optoeletrônica (SBMO)
instacron:SBMO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Microondas e Optoeletrônica (SBMO)
instacron_str SBMO
institution SBMO
reponame_str Journal of Microwaves. Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic Applications
collection Journal of Microwaves. Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic Applications
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of Microwaves. Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic Applications - Sociedade Brasileira de Microondas e Optoeletrônica (SBMO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||editor_jmoe@sbmo.org.br
_version_ 1752122126649786368