Cost-effectiveness of Xpert®MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of tuberculosis: pragmatic study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva,Suely Conceição Alves da
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Vater,Maria Claudia, Ramalho,Daniela Maria de Paula, Almeida,Isabela Neves de, Miranda,Silvana Spíndola de, Kritski,Afrânio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822021000100311
Resumo: Abstract INTRODUCTION: The intensification of research and innovation with the creation of networks of rapid and effective molecular tests as strategies for the end of tuberculosis are essential to avoid late diagnosis and for the eradication of the disease. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Xpert®MTB/RIF (Xpert) in the diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis in reference units, in scenarios with and without subsidies, and the respective cost adjustment for today. METHODS: The analyses were performed considering as criterion of effectiveness, negative culture or clinical improvement in the sixth month of follow-up. The comparison was performed using two diagnostic strategies for the drug susceptibility test (DST), BactecTMMGITTM960 System, versus Xpert. The cost effectiveness and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated and dollar-corrected for American inflation (US$ 1.00 = R$ 5,29). RESULTS: Subsidized Xpert had the lowest cost of US$ 33.48 (R$67,52) and the highest incremental average efficiency (13.57), thus being a dominated analysis. After the inflation was calculated, the mean cost was DST-MGIT=US$ 74.85 (R$ 396,73) and Xpert = US$ 37.33 (R$197,86) with subsidies. CONCLUSIONS: The Xpert in the diagnosis of TB-DR in these reference units was cost-effective with subsidies. In the absence of a subsidy, Xpert in TB-DR is not characterized as cost effective. This factor reveals the vulnerability of countries dependent on international organizations’ subsidy policies.
id SBMT-1_04409245d0050a18fd767d747068b8af
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0037-86822021000100311
network_acronym_str SBMT-1
network_name_str Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
repository_id_str
spelling Cost-effectiveness of Xpert®MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of tuberculosis: pragmatic studyMultidrug-resistant tuberculosisCost-effectivenessNew diagnosticsXpert MTB/RIFInnovationAbstract INTRODUCTION: The intensification of research and innovation with the creation of networks of rapid and effective molecular tests as strategies for the end of tuberculosis are essential to avoid late diagnosis and for the eradication of the disease. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Xpert®MTB/RIF (Xpert) in the diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis in reference units, in scenarios with and without subsidies, and the respective cost adjustment for today. METHODS: The analyses were performed considering as criterion of effectiveness, negative culture or clinical improvement in the sixth month of follow-up. The comparison was performed using two diagnostic strategies for the drug susceptibility test (DST), BactecTMMGITTM960 System, versus Xpert. The cost effectiveness and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated and dollar-corrected for American inflation (US$ 1.00 = R$ 5,29). RESULTS: Subsidized Xpert had the lowest cost of US$ 33.48 (R$67,52) and the highest incremental average efficiency (13.57), thus being a dominated analysis. After the inflation was calculated, the mean cost was DST-MGIT=US$ 74.85 (R$ 396,73) and Xpert = US$ 37.33 (R$197,86) with subsidies. CONCLUSIONS: The Xpert in the diagnosis of TB-DR in these reference units was cost-effective with subsidies. In the absence of a subsidy, Xpert in TB-DR is not characterized as cost effective. This factor reveals the vulnerability of countries dependent on international organizations’ subsidy policies.Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822021000100311Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical v.54 2021reponame:Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropicalinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)instacron:SBMT10.1590/0037-8682-0755-2020info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Suely Conceição Alves daVater,Maria ClaudiaRamalho,Daniela Maria de PaulaAlmeida,Isabela Neves deMiranda,Silvana Spíndola deKritski,Afrânioeng2021-04-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0037-86822021000100311Revistahttps://www.sbmt.org.br/portal/revista/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||dalmo@rsbmt.uftm.edu.br|| rsbmt@rsbmt.uftm.edu.br1678-98490037-8682opendoar:2021-04-08T00:00Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cost-effectiveness of Xpert®MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of tuberculosis: pragmatic study
title Cost-effectiveness of Xpert®MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of tuberculosis: pragmatic study
spellingShingle Cost-effectiveness of Xpert®MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of tuberculosis: pragmatic study
Silva,Suely Conceição Alves da
Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis
Cost-effectiveness
New diagnostics
Xpert MTB/RIF
Innovation
title_short Cost-effectiveness of Xpert®MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of tuberculosis: pragmatic study
title_full Cost-effectiveness of Xpert®MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of tuberculosis: pragmatic study
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of Xpert®MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of tuberculosis: pragmatic study
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of Xpert®MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of tuberculosis: pragmatic study
title_sort Cost-effectiveness of Xpert®MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of tuberculosis: pragmatic study
author Silva,Suely Conceição Alves da
author_facet Silva,Suely Conceição Alves da
Vater,Maria Claudia
Ramalho,Daniela Maria de Paula
Almeida,Isabela Neves de
Miranda,Silvana Spíndola de
Kritski,Afrânio
author_role author
author2 Vater,Maria Claudia
Ramalho,Daniela Maria de Paula
Almeida,Isabela Neves de
Miranda,Silvana Spíndola de
Kritski,Afrânio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva,Suely Conceição Alves da
Vater,Maria Claudia
Ramalho,Daniela Maria de Paula
Almeida,Isabela Neves de
Miranda,Silvana Spíndola de
Kritski,Afrânio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis
Cost-effectiveness
New diagnostics
Xpert MTB/RIF
Innovation
topic Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis
Cost-effectiveness
New diagnostics
Xpert MTB/RIF
Innovation
description Abstract INTRODUCTION: The intensification of research and innovation with the creation of networks of rapid and effective molecular tests as strategies for the end of tuberculosis are essential to avoid late diagnosis and for the eradication of the disease. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Xpert®MTB/RIF (Xpert) in the diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis in reference units, in scenarios with and without subsidies, and the respective cost adjustment for today. METHODS: The analyses were performed considering as criterion of effectiveness, negative culture or clinical improvement in the sixth month of follow-up. The comparison was performed using two diagnostic strategies for the drug susceptibility test (DST), BactecTMMGITTM960 System, versus Xpert. The cost effectiveness and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated and dollar-corrected for American inflation (US$ 1.00 = R$ 5,29). RESULTS: Subsidized Xpert had the lowest cost of US$ 33.48 (R$67,52) and the highest incremental average efficiency (13.57), thus being a dominated analysis. After the inflation was calculated, the mean cost was DST-MGIT=US$ 74.85 (R$ 396,73) and Xpert = US$ 37.33 (R$197,86) with subsidies. CONCLUSIONS: The Xpert in the diagnosis of TB-DR in these reference units was cost-effective with subsidies. In the absence of a subsidy, Xpert in TB-DR is not characterized as cost effective. This factor reveals the vulnerability of countries dependent on international organizations’ subsidy policies.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822021000100311
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822021000100311
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0037-8682-0755-2020
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical v.54 2021
reponame:Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)
instacron:SBMT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)
instacron_str SBMT
institution SBMT
reponame_str Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
collection Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||dalmo@rsbmt.uftm.edu.br|| rsbmt@rsbmt.uftm.edu.br
_version_ 1752122162572951552