Cost-effectiveness of Xpert®MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of tuberculosis: pragmatic study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822021000100311 |
Resumo: | Abstract INTRODUCTION: The intensification of research and innovation with the creation of networks of rapid and effective molecular tests as strategies for the end of tuberculosis are essential to avoid late diagnosis and for the eradication of the disease. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Xpert®MTB/RIF (Xpert) in the diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis in reference units, in scenarios with and without subsidies, and the respective cost adjustment for today. METHODS: The analyses were performed considering as criterion of effectiveness, negative culture or clinical improvement in the sixth month of follow-up. The comparison was performed using two diagnostic strategies for the drug susceptibility test (DST), BactecTMMGITTM960 System, versus Xpert. The cost effectiveness and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated and dollar-corrected for American inflation (US$ 1.00 = R$ 5,29). RESULTS: Subsidized Xpert had the lowest cost of US$ 33.48 (R$67,52) and the highest incremental average efficiency (13.57), thus being a dominated analysis. After the inflation was calculated, the mean cost was DST-MGIT=US$ 74.85 (R$ 396,73) and Xpert = US$ 37.33 (R$197,86) with subsidies. CONCLUSIONS: The Xpert in the diagnosis of TB-DR in these reference units was cost-effective with subsidies. In the absence of a subsidy, Xpert in TB-DR is not characterized as cost effective. This factor reveals the vulnerability of countries dependent on international organizations’ subsidy policies. |
id |
SBMT-1_04409245d0050a18fd767d747068b8af |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0037-86822021000100311 |
network_acronym_str |
SBMT-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Cost-effectiveness of Xpert®MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of tuberculosis: pragmatic studyMultidrug-resistant tuberculosisCost-effectivenessNew diagnosticsXpert MTB/RIFInnovationAbstract INTRODUCTION: The intensification of research and innovation with the creation of networks of rapid and effective molecular tests as strategies for the end of tuberculosis are essential to avoid late diagnosis and for the eradication of the disease. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Xpert®MTB/RIF (Xpert) in the diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis in reference units, in scenarios with and without subsidies, and the respective cost adjustment for today. METHODS: The analyses were performed considering as criterion of effectiveness, negative culture or clinical improvement in the sixth month of follow-up. The comparison was performed using two diagnostic strategies for the drug susceptibility test (DST), BactecTMMGITTM960 System, versus Xpert. The cost effectiveness and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated and dollar-corrected for American inflation (US$ 1.00 = R$ 5,29). RESULTS: Subsidized Xpert had the lowest cost of US$ 33.48 (R$67,52) and the highest incremental average efficiency (13.57), thus being a dominated analysis. After the inflation was calculated, the mean cost was DST-MGIT=US$ 74.85 (R$ 396,73) and Xpert = US$ 37.33 (R$197,86) with subsidies. CONCLUSIONS: The Xpert in the diagnosis of TB-DR in these reference units was cost-effective with subsidies. In the absence of a subsidy, Xpert in TB-DR is not characterized as cost effective. This factor reveals the vulnerability of countries dependent on international organizations’ subsidy policies.Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822021000100311Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical v.54 2021reponame:Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropicalinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)instacron:SBMT10.1590/0037-8682-0755-2020info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Suely Conceição Alves daVater,Maria ClaudiaRamalho,Daniela Maria de PaulaAlmeida,Isabela Neves deMiranda,Silvana Spíndola deKritski,Afrânioeng2021-04-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0037-86822021000100311Revistahttps://www.sbmt.org.br/portal/revista/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||dalmo@rsbmt.uftm.edu.br|| rsbmt@rsbmt.uftm.edu.br1678-98490037-8682opendoar:2021-04-08T00:00Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Cost-effectiveness of Xpert®MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of tuberculosis: pragmatic study |
title |
Cost-effectiveness of Xpert®MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of tuberculosis: pragmatic study |
spellingShingle |
Cost-effectiveness of Xpert®MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of tuberculosis: pragmatic study Silva,Suely Conceição Alves da Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis Cost-effectiveness New diagnostics Xpert MTB/RIF Innovation |
title_short |
Cost-effectiveness of Xpert®MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of tuberculosis: pragmatic study |
title_full |
Cost-effectiveness of Xpert®MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of tuberculosis: pragmatic study |
title_fullStr |
Cost-effectiveness of Xpert®MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of tuberculosis: pragmatic study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cost-effectiveness of Xpert®MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of tuberculosis: pragmatic study |
title_sort |
Cost-effectiveness of Xpert®MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of tuberculosis: pragmatic study |
author |
Silva,Suely Conceição Alves da |
author_facet |
Silva,Suely Conceição Alves da Vater,Maria Claudia Ramalho,Daniela Maria de Paula Almeida,Isabela Neves de Miranda,Silvana Spíndola de Kritski,Afrânio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vater,Maria Claudia Ramalho,Daniela Maria de Paula Almeida,Isabela Neves de Miranda,Silvana Spíndola de Kritski,Afrânio |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva,Suely Conceição Alves da Vater,Maria Claudia Ramalho,Daniela Maria de Paula Almeida,Isabela Neves de Miranda,Silvana Spíndola de Kritski,Afrânio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis Cost-effectiveness New diagnostics Xpert MTB/RIF Innovation |
topic |
Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis Cost-effectiveness New diagnostics Xpert MTB/RIF Innovation |
description |
Abstract INTRODUCTION: The intensification of research and innovation with the creation of networks of rapid and effective molecular tests as strategies for the end of tuberculosis are essential to avoid late diagnosis and for the eradication of the disease. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Xpert®MTB/RIF (Xpert) in the diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis in reference units, in scenarios with and without subsidies, and the respective cost adjustment for today. METHODS: The analyses were performed considering as criterion of effectiveness, negative culture or clinical improvement in the sixth month of follow-up. The comparison was performed using two diagnostic strategies for the drug susceptibility test (DST), BactecTMMGITTM960 System, versus Xpert. The cost effectiveness and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated and dollar-corrected for American inflation (US$ 1.00 = R$ 5,29). RESULTS: Subsidized Xpert had the lowest cost of US$ 33.48 (R$67,52) and the highest incremental average efficiency (13.57), thus being a dominated analysis. After the inflation was calculated, the mean cost was DST-MGIT=US$ 74.85 (R$ 396,73) and Xpert = US$ 37.33 (R$197,86) with subsidies. CONCLUSIONS: The Xpert in the diagnosis of TB-DR in these reference units was cost-effective with subsidies. In the absence of a subsidy, Xpert in TB-DR is not characterized as cost effective. This factor reveals the vulnerability of countries dependent on international organizations’ subsidy policies. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822021000100311 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822021000100311 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0037-8682-0755-2020 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical v.54 2021 reponame:Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT) instacron:SBMT |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT) |
instacron_str |
SBMT |
institution |
SBMT |
reponame_str |
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical |
collection |
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||dalmo@rsbmt.uftm.edu.br|| rsbmt@rsbmt.uftm.edu.br |
_version_ |
1752122162572951552 |