Distribution of clinical isolates of Candida spp. and antifungal susceptibility of high biofilm-forming Candida isolates
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822018000500644 |
Resumo: | Abstract INTRODUCTION: The increase in the incidence of fungal infections, especially those caused by Candida albicans and other Candida species, necessitates the understanding and treatment of Candida-associated infections. In this study, we aimed to investigate the identification, distribution, and biofilm formation ability of different clinical Candida isolates and evaluate the distribution and antifungal susceptibilities of high biofilm-forming (HBF) Candida isolates. METHODS: For identification, carbohydrate fermentation, carbohydrate assimilation, and ChromAgar tests were used. Biofilm formation was assessed using crystal violet binding assay, while the susceptibility to antifungal agents was determined using ATBTM Fungus 3 test kits. RESULTS: The majority of Candida species were C. parapsilosis (31.3%; 31/99) and C. tropicalis (30.3%; 30/99). C. tropicalis was found to be the most frequently isolated species among all HBF Candida species. HBF Candida isolates were more frequently isolated from vaginal swab (35.7%; 10/28), tracheal aspirate (17.9%; 5/28), and urine (17.9%; 5/28). The majority of tested isolates were resistant to itraconazole and voriconazole, whereas no isolate was deemed resistant to 5-flucytosine. CONCLUSIONS: C. tropicalis displays the highest biofilm formation ability among all the Candida species evaluated, and HBF Candida isolates were more frequently seen in vaginal swab, tracheal aspirate, and urine samples. Our findings revealed that 5-flucytosine is the most efficient antifungal agent against HBF Candida isolates. |
id |
SBMT-1_0a7b94d7ecf7aa6efbbdd23fd5bfff2d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0037-86822018000500644 |
network_acronym_str |
SBMT-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Distribution of clinical isolates of Candida spp. and antifungal susceptibility of high biofilm-forming Candida isolatesAntifungal resistanceBiofilm formationCandida albicansNon-Candida albicansCandida Species5-FlucytosineAbstract INTRODUCTION: The increase in the incidence of fungal infections, especially those caused by Candida albicans and other Candida species, necessitates the understanding and treatment of Candida-associated infections. In this study, we aimed to investigate the identification, distribution, and biofilm formation ability of different clinical Candida isolates and evaluate the distribution and antifungal susceptibilities of high biofilm-forming (HBF) Candida isolates. METHODS: For identification, carbohydrate fermentation, carbohydrate assimilation, and ChromAgar tests were used. Biofilm formation was assessed using crystal violet binding assay, while the susceptibility to antifungal agents was determined using ATBTM Fungus 3 test kits. RESULTS: The majority of Candida species were C. parapsilosis (31.3%; 31/99) and C. tropicalis (30.3%; 30/99). C. tropicalis was found to be the most frequently isolated species among all HBF Candida species. HBF Candida isolates were more frequently isolated from vaginal swab (35.7%; 10/28), tracheal aspirate (17.9%; 5/28), and urine (17.9%; 5/28). The majority of tested isolates were resistant to itraconazole and voriconazole, whereas no isolate was deemed resistant to 5-flucytosine. CONCLUSIONS: C. tropicalis displays the highest biofilm formation ability among all the Candida species evaluated, and HBF Candida isolates were more frequently seen in vaginal swab, tracheal aspirate, and urine samples. Our findings revealed that 5-flucytosine is the most efficient antifungal agent against HBF Candida isolates.Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT2018-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822018000500644Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical v.51 n.5 2018reponame:Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropicalinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)instacron:SBMT10.1590/0037-8682-0136-2018info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSahal,GulcanBilkay,Isil Seyiseng2019-07-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0037-86822018000500644Revistahttps://www.sbmt.org.br/portal/revista/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||dalmo@rsbmt.uftm.edu.br|| rsbmt@rsbmt.uftm.edu.br1678-98490037-8682opendoar:2019-07-29T00:00Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Distribution of clinical isolates of Candida spp. and antifungal susceptibility of high biofilm-forming Candida isolates |
title |
Distribution of clinical isolates of Candida spp. and antifungal susceptibility of high biofilm-forming Candida isolates |
spellingShingle |
Distribution of clinical isolates of Candida spp. and antifungal susceptibility of high biofilm-forming Candida isolates Sahal,Gulcan Antifungal resistance Biofilm formation Candida albicans Non-Candida albicans Candida Species 5-Flucytosine |
title_short |
Distribution of clinical isolates of Candida spp. and antifungal susceptibility of high biofilm-forming Candida isolates |
title_full |
Distribution of clinical isolates of Candida spp. and antifungal susceptibility of high biofilm-forming Candida isolates |
title_fullStr |
Distribution of clinical isolates of Candida spp. and antifungal susceptibility of high biofilm-forming Candida isolates |
title_full_unstemmed |
Distribution of clinical isolates of Candida spp. and antifungal susceptibility of high biofilm-forming Candida isolates |
title_sort |
Distribution of clinical isolates of Candida spp. and antifungal susceptibility of high biofilm-forming Candida isolates |
author |
Sahal,Gulcan |
author_facet |
Sahal,Gulcan Bilkay,Isil Seyis |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bilkay,Isil Seyis |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sahal,Gulcan Bilkay,Isil Seyis |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Antifungal resistance Biofilm formation Candida albicans Non-Candida albicans Candida Species 5-Flucytosine |
topic |
Antifungal resistance Biofilm formation Candida albicans Non-Candida albicans Candida Species 5-Flucytosine |
description |
Abstract INTRODUCTION: The increase in the incidence of fungal infections, especially those caused by Candida albicans and other Candida species, necessitates the understanding and treatment of Candida-associated infections. In this study, we aimed to investigate the identification, distribution, and biofilm formation ability of different clinical Candida isolates and evaluate the distribution and antifungal susceptibilities of high biofilm-forming (HBF) Candida isolates. METHODS: For identification, carbohydrate fermentation, carbohydrate assimilation, and ChromAgar tests were used. Biofilm formation was assessed using crystal violet binding assay, while the susceptibility to antifungal agents was determined using ATBTM Fungus 3 test kits. RESULTS: The majority of Candida species were C. parapsilosis (31.3%; 31/99) and C. tropicalis (30.3%; 30/99). C. tropicalis was found to be the most frequently isolated species among all HBF Candida species. HBF Candida isolates were more frequently isolated from vaginal swab (35.7%; 10/28), tracheal aspirate (17.9%; 5/28), and urine (17.9%; 5/28). The majority of tested isolates were resistant to itraconazole and voriconazole, whereas no isolate was deemed resistant to 5-flucytosine. CONCLUSIONS: C. tropicalis displays the highest biofilm formation ability among all the Candida species evaluated, and HBF Candida isolates were more frequently seen in vaginal swab, tracheal aspirate, and urine samples. Our findings revealed that 5-flucytosine is the most efficient antifungal agent against HBF Candida isolates. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822018000500644 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822018000500644 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0037-8682-0136-2018 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical v.51 n.5 2018 reponame:Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT) instacron:SBMT |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT) |
instacron_str |
SBMT |
institution |
SBMT |
reponame_str |
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical |
collection |
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||dalmo@rsbmt.uftm.edu.br|| rsbmt@rsbmt.uftm.edu.br |
_version_ |
1752122161487675392 |