Comparison of capture methods for the diagnosis of adult anopheline populations from State of Mato Grosso, Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822011000500005 |
Resumo: | INTRODUCTION: The present study compares human landing catches of primary malaria vectors with two alternative methods of capture: the Shannon trap and the Mosquito magnet. METHODS: This study used regression models to adjust capture data to a negative binominal distribution. RESULTS: Capture numbers and relative percentages obtained from the three methods vary strongly between species. The highest overall captures were obtained for Anopheles triannulatus with captures for the Shannon trap and the Mosquito magnet measuring more than 330% higher than captures obtained by human landings. For Anopheles darlingi, captures by the Shannon trap and the Mosquito magnet were about 14% and 26% of human landing catches, respectively. Another species with malaria transmission potential that was not sampled by human landing captures weascaptured by the Shannon trap and the Mosquito magnet (Anopheles oswaldoi). Both alternative sampling techniques can predict the human landing of Anopheles triannulatus, but without proportionality. Models for Anopheles darlingi counts, after totaling daily captures, are significant and proportional, but prediction models are more reliable when using the Shannon trap compared with the Mosquito magnet captures. CONCLUSIONS: These alternative capture methods can be partially recommended for the substitution of human landing captures or, at least, as complementary forms of monitoring for malarial mosquitoes. |
id |
SBMT-1_bf49ee06f5e1297631ff0b32923d5107 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0037-86822011000500005 |
network_acronym_str |
SBMT-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of capture methods for the diagnosis of adult anopheline populations from State of Mato Grosso, BrazilAnophelesCapture methodsShannon trapMosquito magnetHuman landingMato GrossoINTRODUCTION: The present study compares human landing catches of primary malaria vectors with two alternative methods of capture: the Shannon trap and the Mosquito magnet. METHODS: This study used regression models to adjust capture data to a negative binominal distribution. RESULTS: Capture numbers and relative percentages obtained from the three methods vary strongly between species. The highest overall captures were obtained for Anopheles triannulatus with captures for the Shannon trap and the Mosquito magnet measuring more than 330% higher than captures obtained by human landings. For Anopheles darlingi, captures by the Shannon trap and the Mosquito magnet were about 14% and 26% of human landing catches, respectively. Another species with malaria transmission potential that was not sampled by human landing captures weascaptured by the Shannon trap and the Mosquito magnet (Anopheles oswaldoi). Both alternative sampling techniques can predict the human landing of Anopheles triannulatus, but without proportionality. Models for Anopheles darlingi counts, after totaling daily captures, are significant and proportional, but prediction models are more reliable when using the Shannon trap compared with the Mosquito magnet captures. CONCLUSIONS: These alternative capture methods can be partially recommended for the substitution of human landing captures or, at least, as complementary forms of monitoring for malarial mosquitoes.Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT2011-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822011000500005Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical v.44 n.5 2011reponame:Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropicalinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)instacron:SBMT10.1590/S0037-86822011005000053info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMissawa,Nanci AkemiRibeiro,Ana Lúcia MariaMaciel,Giovana Belem Moreira LimaZeilhofer,Petereng2011-10-25T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0037-86822011000500005Revistahttps://www.sbmt.org.br/portal/revista/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||dalmo@rsbmt.uftm.edu.br|| rsbmt@rsbmt.uftm.edu.br1678-98490037-8682opendoar:2011-10-25T00:00Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of capture methods for the diagnosis of adult anopheline populations from State of Mato Grosso, Brazil |
title |
Comparison of capture methods for the diagnosis of adult anopheline populations from State of Mato Grosso, Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of capture methods for the diagnosis of adult anopheline populations from State of Mato Grosso, Brazil Missawa,Nanci Akemi Anopheles Capture methods Shannon trap Mosquito magnet Human landing Mato Grosso |
title_short |
Comparison of capture methods for the diagnosis of adult anopheline populations from State of Mato Grosso, Brazil |
title_full |
Comparison of capture methods for the diagnosis of adult anopheline populations from State of Mato Grosso, Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of capture methods for the diagnosis of adult anopheline populations from State of Mato Grosso, Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of capture methods for the diagnosis of adult anopheline populations from State of Mato Grosso, Brazil |
title_sort |
Comparison of capture methods for the diagnosis of adult anopheline populations from State of Mato Grosso, Brazil |
author |
Missawa,Nanci Akemi |
author_facet |
Missawa,Nanci Akemi Ribeiro,Ana Lúcia Maria Maciel,Giovana Belem Moreira Lima Zeilhofer,Peter |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ribeiro,Ana Lúcia Maria Maciel,Giovana Belem Moreira Lima Zeilhofer,Peter |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Missawa,Nanci Akemi Ribeiro,Ana Lúcia Maria Maciel,Giovana Belem Moreira Lima Zeilhofer,Peter |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Anopheles Capture methods Shannon trap Mosquito magnet Human landing Mato Grosso |
topic |
Anopheles Capture methods Shannon trap Mosquito magnet Human landing Mato Grosso |
description |
INTRODUCTION: The present study compares human landing catches of primary malaria vectors with two alternative methods of capture: the Shannon trap and the Mosquito magnet. METHODS: This study used regression models to adjust capture data to a negative binominal distribution. RESULTS: Capture numbers and relative percentages obtained from the three methods vary strongly between species. The highest overall captures were obtained for Anopheles triannulatus with captures for the Shannon trap and the Mosquito magnet measuring more than 330% higher than captures obtained by human landings. For Anopheles darlingi, captures by the Shannon trap and the Mosquito magnet were about 14% and 26% of human landing catches, respectively. Another species with malaria transmission potential that was not sampled by human landing captures weascaptured by the Shannon trap and the Mosquito magnet (Anopheles oswaldoi). Both alternative sampling techniques can predict the human landing of Anopheles triannulatus, but without proportionality. Models for Anopheles darlingi counts, after totaling daily captures, are significant and proportional, but prediction models are more reliable when using the Shannon trap compared with the Mosquito magnet captures. CONCLUSIONS: These alternative capture methods can be partially recommended for the substitution of human landing captures or, at least, as complementary forms of monitoring for malarial mosquitoes. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822011000500005 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822011000500005 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0037-86822011005000053 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical v.44 n.5 2011 reponame:Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT) instacron:SBMT |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT) |
instacron_str |
SBMT |
institution |
SBMT |
reponame_str |
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical |
collection |
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||dalmo@rsbmt.uftm.edu.br|| rsbmt@rsbmt.uftm.edu.br |
_version_ |
1752122157277642752 |