Investigation of canine visceral leishmaniasis in a non-endemic area in Brazil and the comparison of serological and molecular diagnostic tests
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822021000100333 |
Resumo: | Abstract INTRODUCTION: Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is an important zoonosis in Brazil. Previous identification of parasitized dogs can also help prevent the disease in humans, even in non-endemic areas of the country. The Brazilian Ministry of Health recommends diagnosis in dogs using a DPP® (rapid test) as a screening test and an immunoenzymatic assay (ELISA) as a confirmatory test (DPP®+ELISA), and culling infected dogs as a legal control measure. However, the accuracy of these serological tests has been questioned. METHODS: VL in dogs was investigated in a non-endemic area of the São Paulo state for three consecutive years, and the performances of different diagnostic tests were compared. RESULTS: A total of 331 dog samples were collected in 2015, 373 in 2016, and 347 in 2017. The seroprevalence by DPP®+ELISA was 3.3, 3.2, and 0.3%, respectively, and by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA), it was 3.0, 5.6, and 5.5%, respectively. ELISA confirmed 18.4% of DPP® positive samples. The concordance between the IFA and DPP® was 83.9%. The concordance between IFA and DPP®+ELISA was 92.9%. A molecular diagnostic test (PCR) was performed in 63.2% of the seropositive samples, all of which were negative. CONCLUSIONS: In non-endemic areas, diagnostic tests in dogs should be carefully evaluated to avoid false results. |
id |
SBMT-1_f3483bfe2c75a817a715d40b31bd1c96 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0037-86822021000100333 |
network_acronym_str |
SBMT-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Investigation of canine visceral leishmaniasis in a non-endemic area in Brazil and the comparison of serological and molecular diagnostic testsSeroprevalenceDPP®-Dual Path platformIFAELISADogCãoservação ProgramAbstract INTRODUCTION: Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is an important zoonosis in Brazil. Previous identification of parasitized dogs can also help prevent the disease in humans, even in non-endemic areas of the country. The Brazilian Ministry of Health recommends diagnosis in dogs using a DPP® (rapid test) as a screening test and an immunoenzymatic assay (ELISA) as a confirmatory test (DPP®+ELISA), and culling infected dogs as a legal control measure. However, the accuracy of these serological tests has been questioned. METHODS: VL in dogs was investigated in a non-endemic area of the São Paulo state for three consecutive years, and the performances of different diagnostic tests were compared. RESULTS: A total of 331 dog samples were collected in 2015, 373 in 2016, and 347 in 2017. The seroprevalence by DPP®+ELISA was 3.3, 3.2, and 0.3%, respectively, and by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA), it was 3.0, 5.6, and 5.5%, respectively. ELISA confirmed 18.4% of DPP® positive samples. The concordance between the IFA and DPP® was 83.9%. The concordance between IFA and DPP®+ELISA was 92.9%. A molecular diagnostic test (PCR) was performed in 63.2% of the seropositive samples, all of which were negative. CONCLUSIONS: In non-endemic areas, diagnostic tests in dogs should be carefully evaluated to avoid false results.Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822021000100333Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical v.54 2021reponame:Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropicalinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)instacron:SBMT10.1590/0037-8682-0182-2021info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSevá,Anaiá da PaixãoBrandão,Ana Pérola DrullaGodoy,Silvia NeriSoares,Rodrigo MartinsLangoni,HelioRodrigues,Bruna CristineGava,Mariana Zanchetta eZanotto,Paula Ferraz de CamargoJimenez-Villegas,TatianaHiramoto,RobertoFerreira,Fernandoeng2021-09-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0037-86822021000100333Revistahttps://www.sbmt.org.br/portal/revista/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||dalmo@rsbmt.uftm.edu.br|| rsbmt@rsbmt.uftm.edu.br1678-98490037-8682opendoar:2021-09-03T00:00Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Investigation of canine visceral leishmaniasis in a non-endemic area in Brazil and the comparison of serological and molecular diagnostic tests |
title |
Investigation of canine visceral leishmaniasis in a non-endemic area in Brazil and the comparison of serological and molecular diagnostic tests |
spellingShingle |
Investigation of canine visceral leishmaniasis in a non-endemic area in Brazil and the comparison of serological and molecular diagnostic tests Sevá,Anaiá da Paixão Seroprevalence DPP®-Dual Path platform IFA ELISA Dog Cãoservação Program |
title_short |
Investigation of canine visceral leishmaniasis in a non-endemic area in Brazil and the comparison of serological and molecular diagnostic tests |
title_full |
Investigation of canine visceral leishmaniasis in a non-endemic area in Brazil and the comparison of serological and molecular diagnostic tests |
title_fullStr |
Investigation of canine visceral leishmaniasis in a non-endemic area in Brazil and the comparison of serological and molecular diagnostic tests |
title_full_unstemmed |
Investigation of canine visceral leishmaniasis in a non-endemic area in Brazil and the comparison of serological and molecular diagnostic tests |
title_sort |
Investigation of canine visceral leishmaniasis in a non-endemic area in Brazil and the comparison of serological and molecular diagnostic tests |
author |
Sevá,Anaiá da Paixão |
author_facet |
Sevá,Anaiá da Paixão Brandão,Ana Pérola Drulla Godoy,Silvia Neri Soares,Rodrigo Martins Langoni,Helio Rodrigues,Bruna Cristine Gava,Mariana Zanchetta e Zanotto,Paula Ferraz de Camargo Jimenez-Villegas,Tatiana Hiramoto,Roberto Ferreira,Fernando |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Brandão,Ana Pérola Drulla Godoy,Silvia Neri Soares,Rodrigo Martins Langoni,Helio Rodrigues,Bruna Cristine Gava,Mariana Zanchetta e Zanotto,Paula Ferraz de Camargo Jimenez-Villegas,Tatiana Hiramoto,Roberto Ferreira,Fernando |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sevá,Anaiá da Paixão Brandão,Ana Pérola Drulla Godoy,Silvia Neri Soares,Rodrigo Martins Langoni,Helio Rodrigues,Bruna Cristine Gava,Mariana Zanchetta e Zanotto,Paula Ferraz de Camargo Jimenez-Villegas,Tatiana Hiramoto,Roberto Ferreira,Fernando |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Seroprevalence DPP®-Dual Path platform IFA ELISA Dog Cãoservação Program |
topic |
Seroprevalence DPP®-Dual Path platform IFA ELISA Dog Cãoservação Program |
description |
Abstract INTRODUCTION: Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is an important zoonosis in Brazil. Previous identification of parasitized dogs can also help prevent the disease in humans, even in non-endemic areas of the country. The Brazilian Ministry of Health recommends diagnosis in dogs using a DPP® (rapid test) as a screening test and an immunoenzymatic assay (ELISA) as a confirmatory test (DPP®+ELISA), and culling infected dogs as a legal control measure. However, the accuracy of these serological tests has been questioned. METHODS: VL in dogs was investigated in a non-endemic area of the São Paulo state for three consecutive years, and the performances of different diagnostic tests were compared. RESULTS: A total of 331 dog samples were collected in 2015, 373 in 2016, and 347 in 2017. The seroprevalence by DPP®+ELISA was 3.3, 3.2, and 0.3%, respectively, and by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA), it was 3.0, 5.6, and 5.5%, respectively. ELISA confirmed 18.4% of DPP® positive samples. The concordance between the IFA and DPP® was 83.9%. The concordance between IFA and DPP®+ELISA was 92.9%. A molecular diagnostic test (PCR) was performed in 63.2% of the seropositive samples, all of which were negative. CONCLUSIONS: In non-endemic areas, diagnostic tests in dogs should be carefully evaluated to avoid false results. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822021000100333 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822021000100333 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0037-8682-0182-2021 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical v.54 2021 reponame:Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT) instacron:SBMT |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT) |
instacron_str |
SBMT |
institution |
SBMT |
reponame_str |
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical |
collection |
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||dalmo@rsbmt.uftm.edu.br|| rsbmt@rsbmt.uftm.edu.br |
_version_ |
1752122162652643328 |