Investigation of canine visceral leishmaniasis in a non-endemic area in Brazil and the comparison of serological and molecular diagnostic tests

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sevá,Anaiá da Paixão
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Brandão,Ana Pérola Drulla, Godoy,Silvia Neri, Soares,Rodrigo Martins, Langoni,Helio, Rodrigues,Bruna Cristine, Gava,Mariana Zanchetta e, Zanotto,Paula Ferraz de Camargo, Jimenez-Villegas,Tatiana, Hiramoto,Roberto, Ferreira,Fernando
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822021000100333
Resumo: Abstract INTRODUCTION: Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is an important zoonosis in Brazil. Previous identification of parasitized dogs can also help prevent the disease in humans, even in non-endemic areas of the country. The Brazilian Ministry of Health recommends diagnosis in dogs using a DPP® (rapid test) as a screening test and an immunoenzymatic assay (ELISA) as a confirmatory test (DPP®+ELISA), and culling infected dogs as a legal control measure. However, the accuracy of these serological tests has been questioned. METHODS: VL in dogs was investigated in a non-endemic area of the São Paulo state for three consecutive years, and the performances of different diagnostic tests were compared. RESULTS: A total of 331 dog samples were collected in 2015, 373 in 2016, and 347 in 2017. The seroprevalence by DPP®+ELISA was 3.3, 3.2, and 0.3%, respectively, and by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA), it was 3.0, 5.6, and 5.5%, respectively. ELISA confirmed 18.4% of DPP® positive samples. The concordance between the IFA and DPP® was 83.9%. The concordance between IFA and DPP®+ELISA was 92.9%. A molecular diagnostic test (PCR) was performed in 63.2% of the seropositive samples, all of which were negative. CONCLUSIONS: In non-endemic areas, diagnostic tests in dogs should be carefully evaluated to avoid false results.
id SBMT-1_f3483bfe2c75a817a715d40b31bd1c96
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0037-86822021000100333
network_acronym_str SBMT-1
network_name_str Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
repository_id_str
spelling Investigation of canine visceral leishmaniasis in a non-endemic area in Brazil and the comparison of serological and molecular diagnostic testsSeroprevalenceDPP®-Dual Path platformIFAELISADogCãoservação ProgramAbstract INTRODUCTION: Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is an important zoonosis in Brazil. Previous identification of parasitized dogs can also help prevent the disease in humans, even in non-endemic areas of the country. The Brazilian Ministry of Health recommends diagnosis in dogs using a DPP® (rapid test) as a screening test and an immunoenzymatic assay (ELISA) as a confirmatory test (DPP®+ELISA), and culling infected dogs as a legal control measure. However, the accuracy of these serological tests has been questioned. METHODS: VL in dogs was investigated in a non-endemic area of the São Paulo state for three consecutive years, and the performances of different diagnostic tests were compared. RESULTS: A total of 331 dog samples were collected in 2015, 373 in 2016, and 347 in 2017. The seroprevalence by DPP®+ELISA was 3.3, 3.2, and 0.3%, respectively, and by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA), it was 3.0, 5.6, and 5.5%, respectively. ELISA confirmed 18.4% of DPP® positive samples. The concordance between the IFA and DPP® was 83.9%. The concordance between IFA and DPP®+ELISA was 92.9%. A molecular diagnostic test (PCR) was performed in 63.2% of the seropositive samples, all of which were negative. CONCLUSIONS: In non-endemic areas, diagnostic tests in dogs should be carefully evaluated to avoid false results.Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822021000100333Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical v.54 2021reponame:Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropicalinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)instacron:SBMT10.1590/0037-8682-0182-2021info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSevá,Anaiá da PaixãoBrandão,Ana Pérola DrullaGodoy,Silvia NeriSoares,Rodrigo MartinsLangoni,HelioRodrigues,Bruna CristineGava,Mariana Zanchetta eZanotto,Paula Ferraz de CamargoJimenez-Villegas,TatianaHiramoto,RobertoFerreira,Fernandoeng2021-09-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0037-86822021000100333Revistahttps://www.sbmt.org.br/portal/revista/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||dalmo@rsbmt.uftm.edu.br|| rsbmt@rsbmt.uftm.edu.br1678-98490037-8682opendoar:2021-09-03T00:00Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Investigation of canine visceral leishmaniasis in a non-endemic area in Brazil and the comparison of serological and molecular diagnostic tests
title Investigation of canine visceral leishmaniasis in a non-endemic area in Brazil and the comparison of serological and molecular diagnostic tests
spellingShingle Investigation of canine visceral leishmaniasis in a non-endemic area in Brazil and the comparison of serological and molecular diagnostic tests
Sevá,Anaiá da Paixão
Seroprevalence
DPP®-Dual Path platform
IFA
ELISA
Dog
Cãoservação Program
title_short Investigation of canine visceral leishmaniasis in a non-endemic area in Brazil and the comparison of serological and molecular diagnostic tests
title_full Investigation of canine visceral leishmaniasis in a non-endemic area in Brazil and the comparison of serological and molecular diagnostic tests
title_fullStr Investigation of canine visceral leishmaniasis in a non-endemic area in Brazil and the comparison of serological and molecular diagnostic tests
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of canine visceral leishmaniasis in a non-endemic area in Brazil and the comparison of serological and molecular diagnostic tests
title_sort Investigation of canine visceral leishmaniasis in a non-endemic area in Brazil and the comparison of serological and molecular diagnostic tests
author Sevá,Anaiá da Paixão
author_facet Sevá,Anaiá da Paixão
Brandão,Ana Pérola Drulla
Godoy,Silvia Neri
Soares,Rodrigo Martins
Langoni,Helio
Rodrigues,Bruna Cristine
Gava,Mariana Zanchetta e
Zanotto,Paula Ferraz de Camargo
Jimenez-Villegas,Tatiana
Hiramoto,Roberto
Ferreira,Fernando
author_role author
author2 Brandão,Ana Pérola Drulla
Godoy,Silvia Neri
Soares,Rodrigo Martins
Langoni,Helio
Rodrigues,Bruna Cristine
Gava,Mariana Zanchetta e
Zanotto,Paula Ferraz de Camargo
Jimenez-Villegas,Tatiana
Hiramoto,Roberto
Ferreira,Fernando
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sevá,Anaiá da Paixão
Brandão,Ana Pérola Drulla
Godoy,Silvia Neri
Soares,Rodrigo Martins
Langoni,Helio
Rodrigues,Bruna Cristine
Gava,Mariana Zanchetta e
Zanotto,Paula Ferraz de Camargo
Jimenez-Villegas,Tatiana
Hiramoto,Roberto
Ferreira,Fernando
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Seroprevalence
DPP®-Dual Path platform
IFA
ELISA
Dog
Cãoservação Program
topic Seroprevalence
DPP®-Dual Path platform
IFA
ELISA
Dog
Cãoservação Program
description Abstract INTRODUCTION: Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is an important zoonosis in Brazil. Previous identification of parasitized dogs can also help prevent the disease in humans, even in non-endemic areas of the country. The Brazilian Ministry of Health recommends diagnosis in dogs using a DPP® (rapid test) as a screening test and an immunoenzymatic assay (ELISA) as a confirmatory test (DPP®+ELISA), and culling infected dogs as a legal control measure. However, the accuracy of these serological tests has been questioned. METHODS: VL in dogs was investigated in a non-endemic area of the São Paulo state for three consecutive years, and the performances of different diagnostic tests were compared. RESULTS: A total of 331 dog samples were collected in 2015, 373 in 2016, and 347 in 2017. The seroprevalence by DPP®+ELISA was 3.3, 3.2, and 0.3%, respectively, and by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA), it was 3.0, 5.6, and 5.5%, respectively. ELISA confirmed 18.4% of DPP® positive samples. The concordance between the IFA and DPP® was 83.9%. The concordance between IFA and DPP®+ELISA was 92.9%. A molecular diagnostic test (PCR) was performed in 63.2% of the seropositive samples, all of which were negative. CONCLUSIONS: In non-endemic areas, diagnostic tests in dogs should be carefully evaluated to avoid false results.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822021000100333
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822021000100333
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0037-8682-0182-2021
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical v.54 2021
reponame:Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)
instacron:SBMT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)
instacron_str SBMT
institution SBMT
reponame_str Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
collection Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||dalmo@rsbmt.uftm.edu.br|| rsbmt@rsbmt.uftm.edu.br
_version_ 1752122162652643328