Cardiopulmonary assessment, quality induction and tracheal intubation with the use of induction adjunct with propofol in dogs

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cabala, Raquel Wolff
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: da Silva, Elisângela Barboza, Clark, Rosana Maria de Oliveira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine
Texto Completo: https://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/243
Resumo: ABSTRACT. Cabala R.W., Silva E.B. & Clark R.M.O. [Cardiopulmonary assessment, quality induction and tracheal intubation with the use of induction adjunct with propofol in dogs.] Avaliação cardiorrespiratória, qualidade de indução e intubação orotraqueal com o uso de coadjuvantes na indução anestésica com propofol em cães. Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterinária, 38(1):39-44, 2016. Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Caixa Postal 1567, Campus Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG 31270-901, Brasil. E-mail: raquelcabala@yahoo.com.br The objective was to evaluate the effects of the use of fentanyl, ketamine or diazepam, as coadjuvant induction of anesthesia with propofol in dogs and to evaluate the cardiovascular, respiratory and quality of induction of anesthesia and tracheal intubation by these agents. Twenty four dogs ASA I and II, of different breeds and average weight 18 ± 6.8 kg, males and females subjected to different surgical procedures were randomly allocated in four groups of six each: G-CP (saline); G-FP (5mcg/kg - fentanyl), G-KP (0,5 mg/kg - ketamine) and G-DP (0,2mg/kg - diazepam). All animals recieved pre-anaesthetic medication with acepromazine (0,05 mg/kg) combined with morphine (0,2 mg/kg) administered intramuscularly. Two minutes after coadjuvants or saline administration, the anaesthetic induction was perfomed with 5mg/kg of propofol or the sufficient dose required to lost protector reflex and ensure endotracheal intubation. HR, SAP, MAP, DAP, RR, ETCO2, SpO2, and To C were measured before pre-anaesthetic medication (M1), 15 minutes after M1 (M2), during induction of anesthesia (M3), at the end of induction anesthetic (M4) and after intubation (M5). The quality of anesthesia was evaluated using a numerical scale by induction and intubation score. The use of fentanyl as co-adjuvant induction reduced significantly propofol dose requirement (2,42±0,38mg/kg), when compared to G-CP (4,43±0,32mg/kg), to G-DP (3,78±1,3mg/kg) and to G-KP (3,90±0,84mg/kg). Significant reductions on arterial pressures ocurred in G-FP, but it were similar in G-CP. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups in mean HR, RR, ETCO2 , SpO2 and To C. SpO2 was reduced in M4 of G-DP. The induction and intubation scores were similar in all groups. The administration of fentanyl decreased propofol requirement but promoted severe hypotension when compared with other co-adjuvants agents. There were minimal undesirable effects. The quality of induction and intubation were satisfactory, but the dogs that were induced with only propofol demonstrated better score.
id SBMV-1_1690c2c1668fa9a889122a2cd2de451e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.rbmv.org:article/243
network_acronym_str SBMV-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine
repository_id_str
spelling Cardiopulmonary assessment, quality induction and tracheal intubation with the use of induction adjunct with propofol in dogsAvaliação cardiorrespiratória, qualidade de indução e intubação orotraqueal com o uso de coadjuvantes na indução anestésica com propofol em cãesPropofolcoadjuvantesindução anestésicacãesPropofolcoadjuvantsanaesthesia inductiondogsABSTRACT. Cabala R.W., Silva E.B. & Clark R.M.O. [Cardiopulmonary assessment, quality induction and tracheal intubation with the use of induction adjunct with propofol in dogs.] Avaliação cardiorrespiratória, qualidade de indução e intubação orotraqueal com o uso de coadjuvantes na indução anestésica com propofol em cães. Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterinária, 38(1):39-44, 2016. Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Caixa Postal 1567, Campus Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG 31270-901, Brasil. E-mail: raquelcabala@yahoo.com.br The objective was to evaluate the effects of the use of fentanyl, ketamine or diazepam, as coadjuvant induction of anesthesia with propofol in dogs and to evaluate the cardiovascular, respiratory and quality of induction of anesthesia and tracheal intubation by these agents. Twenty four dogs ASA I and II, of different breeds and average weight 18 ± 6.8 kg, males and females subjected to different surgical procedures were randomly allocated in four groups of six each: G-CP (saline); G-FP (5mcg/kg - fentanyl), G-KP (0,5 mg/kg - ketamine) and G-DP (0,2mg/kg - diazepam). All animals recieved pre-anaesthetic medication with acepromazine (0,05 mg/kg) combined with morphine (0,2 mg/kg) administered intramuscularly. Two minutes after coadjuvants or saline administration, the anaesthetic induction was perfomed with 5mg/kg of propofol or the sufficient dose required to lost protector reflex and ensure endotracheal intubation. HR, SAP, MAP, DAP, RR, ETCO2, SpO2, and To C were measured before pre-anaesthetic medication (M1), 15 minutes after M1 (M2), during induction of anesthesia (M3), at the end of induction anesthetic (M4) and after intubation (M5). The quality of anesthesia was evaluated using a numerical scale by induction and intubation score. The use of fentanyl as co-adjuvant induction reduced significantly propofol dose requirement (2,42±0,38mg/kg), when compared to G-CP (4,43±0,32mg/kg), to G-DP (3,78±1,3mg/kg) and to G-KP (3,90±0,84mg/kg). Significant reductions on arterial pressures ocurred in G-FP, but it were similar in G-CP. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups in mean HR, RR, ETCO2 , SpO2 and To C. SpO2 was reduced in M4 of G-DP. The induction and intubation scores were similar in all groups. The administration of fentanyl decreased propofol requirement but promoted severe hypotension when compared with other co-adjuvants agents. There were minimal undesirable effects. The quality of induction and intubation were satisfactory, but the dogs that were induced with only propofol demonstrated better score.Objetivou-se avaliar os efeitos cardiorrespiratórios e qualidade de indução do uso do fentanil, quetamina ou diazepam como coadjuvantes da indução anestésica pelo propofol em cães. Foram utilizados 24 cães ASA I e II, de diferentes raças, machos e fêmeas, com peso médio 18±6,8kg, submetidos a diferentes procedimentos cirúrgicos, distribuídos aleatoriamente em quatro grupos de seis animais cada: G-CP (solução salina e propofol); G-FP (5 mcg.kg-1 de fentanil e propofol), G-KP (0,5 mg.kg-1 de quetamina e propofol) e G-DP (0,2mg. kg-1 de diazepam e propofol). Os animais foram pré- -medicados com acepromazina (0,05 mg.kg-1) e morfina (0,2 mg.kg-1), pela via intramuscular. A indução anestésica foi realizada com 5mg.kg-1 de propofol ou aquela suficiente para abolir o reflexo laringotraqueal para realização da intubação orotraqueal. Dois minutos antes do propofol foi administrado o agente coadjuvante ou solução salina conforme os grupos estudados. Avaliaram-se a FC, PAS, PAM, PAD, f, ETCO2, SatO2,e To C que foram mensuradas antes da MPA (M1), 15 minutos após MPA (M2), durante a indução anestésica (M3), ao término da indução anestésica (M4) e após a intubação endotraqueal (M5). A qualidade da indução anestésica foi avaliada através de uma escala numérica denominada escore de indução e intubação. Os coadjuvantes ou a salina foram administrados dois minutos previamente a indução com propofol (5mg.kg-1) até a abolição dos reflexos protetores e intubação orotraqueal. O uso do fentanil como coadjuvantes reduziu a dose do propofol em relação aos demais coadjuvantes e o grupo controle. Além disso, proporcionou redução significativa da pressão arterial, porém de magnitude semelhante ao grupo salina-propofol. Não foram observadas diferenças significativas entre os tratamentos para FC, f, ETCO2 e To C. A SatO2 apresentou redução em M4 no G-DP. A qualidade da indução anestésica foi similar e satisfatória para todos os grupos, não apresentando diferença significativa. O fentanil proporcionou maior redução da dose do propofol, resultando em hipotensão mais severa em relação aos demais agentes coadjuvantes. Os efeitos colaterais foram mínimos. A qualidade de indução e intubação foram similares e satisfatórias, porém os animais que receberam apenas propofol apresentaram os melhores escores.Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.2016-03-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpeer reviewedAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/24310.2430/00000000000000Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine; Vol. 38 No. 1 (2016); 39-44Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterinária; v. 38 n. 1 (2016); 39-442527-21790100-2430reponame:Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicineinstname:Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (SOMVERJ)instacron:SBMVporhttps://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/243/164Cabala, Raquel Wolffda Silva, Elisângela BarbozaClark, Rosana Maria de Oliveirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-12-23T17:26:24Zoai:ojs.rbmv.org:article/243Revistahttps://rbmv.org/BJVMONGhttps://rbmv.org/BJVM/oaicontato.rbmv@gmail.com2527-21790100-2430opendoar:2020-12-23T17:26:24Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine - Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (SOMVERJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cardiopulmonary assessment, quality induction and tracheal intubation with the use of induction adjunct with propofol in dogs
Avaliação cardiorrespiratória, qualidade de indução e intubação orotraqueal com o uso de coadjuvantes na indução anestésica com propofol em cães
title Cardiopulmonary assessment, quality induction and tracheal intubation with the use of induction adjunct with propofol in dogs
spellingShingle Cardiopulmonary assessment, quality induction and tracheal intubation with the use of induction adjunct with propofol in dogs
Cabala, Raquel Wolff
Propofol
coadjuvantes
indução anestésica
cães
Propofol
coadjuvants
anaesthesia induction
dogs
title_short Cardiopulmonary assessment, quality induction and tracheal intubation with the use of induction adjunct with propofol in dogs
title_full Cardiopulmonary assessment, quality induction and tracheal intubation with the use of induction adjunct with propofol in dogs
title_fullStr Cardiopulmonary assessment, quality induction and tracheal intubation with the use of induction adjunct with propofol in dogs
title_full_unstemmed Cardiopulmonary assessment, quality induction and tracheal intubation with the use of induction adjunct with propofol in dogs
title_sort Cardiopulmonary assessment, quality induction and tracheal intubation with the use of induction adjunct with propofol in dogs
author Cabala, Raquel Wolff
author_facet Cabala, Raquel Wolff
da Silva, Elisângela Barboza
Clark, Rosana Maria de Oliveira
author_role author
author2 da Silva, Elisângela Barboza
Clark, Rosana Maria de Oliveira
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cabala, Raquel Wolff
da Silva, Elisângela Barboza
Clark, Rosana Maria de Oliveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Propofol
coadjuvantes
indução anestésica
cães
Propofol
coadjuvants
anaesthesia induction
dogs
topic Propofol
coadjuvantes
indução anestésica
cães
Propofol
coadjuvants
anaesthesia induction
dogs
description ABSTRACT. Cabala R.W., Silva E.B. & Clark R.M.O. [Cardiopulmonary assessment, quality induction and tracheal intubation with the use of induction adjunct with propofol in dogs.] Avaliação cardiorrespiratória, qualidade de indução e intubação orotraqueal com o uso de coadjuvantes na indução anestésica com propofol em cães. Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterinária, 38(1):39-44, 2016. Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Caixa Postal 1567, Campus Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG 31270-901, Brasil. E-mail: raquelcabala@yahoo.com.br The objective was to evaluate the effects of the use of fentanyl, ketamine or diazepam, as coadjuvant induction of anesthesia with propofol in dogs and to evaluate the cardiovascular, respiratory and quality of induction of anesthesia and tracheal intubation by these agents. Twenty four dogs ASA I and II, of different breeds and average weight 18 ± 6.8 kg, males and females subjected to different surgical procedures were randomly allocated in four groups of six each: G-CP (saline); G-FP (5mcg/kg - fentanyl), G-KP (0,5 mg/kg - ketamine) and G-DP (0,2mg/kg - diazepam). All animals recieved pre-anaesthetic medication with acepromazine (0,05 mg/kg) combined with morphine (0,2 mg/kg) administered intramuscularly. Two minutes after coadjuvants or saline administration, the anaesthetic induction was perfomed with 5mg/kg of propofol or the sufficient dose required to lost protector reflex and ensure endotracheal intubation. HR, SAP, MAP, DAP, RR, ETCO2, SpO2, and To C were measured before pre-anaesthetic medication (M1), 15 minutes after M1 (M2), during induction of anesthesia (M3), at the end of induction anesthetic (M4) and after intubation (M5). The quality of anesthesia was evaluated using a numerical scale by induction and intubation score. The use of fentanyl as co-adjuvant induction reduced significantly propofol dose requirement (2,42±0,38mg/kg), when compared to G-CP (4,43±0,32mg/kg), to G-DP (3,78±1,3mg/kg) and to G-KP (3,90±0,84mg/kg). Significant reductions on arterial pressures ocurred in G-FP, but it were similar in G-CP. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups in mean HR, RR, ETCO2 , SpO2 and To C. SpO2 was reduced in M4 of G-DP. The induction and intubation scores were similar in all groups. The administration of fentanyl decreased propofol requirement but promoted severe hypotension when compared with other co-adjuvants agents. There were minimal undesirable effects. The quality of induction and intubation were satisfactory, but the dogs that were induced with only propofol demonstrated better score.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-03-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
peer reviewed
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/243
10.2430/00000000000000
url https://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/243
identifier_str_mv 10.2430/00000000000000
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/243/164
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine; Vol. 38 No. 1 (2016); 39-44
Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterinária; v. 38 n. 1 (2016); 39-44
2527-2179
0100-2430
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine
instname:Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (SOMVERJ)
instacron:SBMV
instname_str Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (SOMVERJ)
instacron_str SBMV
institution SBMV
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine
collection Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine - Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (SOMVERJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv contato.rbmv@gmail.com
_version_ 1798313107009830912