Chemical immobilization of free-living capybaras (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) using ketamine-dexmedetomidine combination and a remote drug delivery system

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: ROSENFIELD, DEREK
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Ferraro, Mario, Igayara, Claudia, Gaigo Cortopassi, Silvia Renata, Schilbach Pizzutto, Cristiane
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine
Texto Completo: https://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/1072
Resumo: Capturing wild capybaras for scientific projects, population control or medical interventions is a growing necessity. With this study, we intended to evaluate a Ketamine/Dexmedetomidine as a reversible chemical restraint in free-ranging synanthropic capybaras, seeking enhanced anesthetic and recovery characteristics while testing a specialized remote drug delivery system (RDDS). For this purpose, 18 adult capybaras (male n = 8; females n = 10) (67.3 ± 9.45 kg), prior to chemical restraint, were physically confined, subsequently darted intramuscularly with 9 mg kg-1 ketamine and 0,005 mg kg-1 dexmedetomidine. Post-intervention, 0,005 mg kg-1 atipamezole, administered IM, was used as a reversal agent (RA), (n = 5). Anesthetic effects were recorded as latency period (LP I/first observed effects) (LP II /lateral recumbency plus time to handle the animal). Recovery time was divided into (R1/no RA, fully recovered/ready for release), (R2a/R2b, with RA, time to ambulant position plus time to full recovery/release, respectively). Vital signs were recorded at a 15-minute interval. GraphPad Prism 8.1.1 was used to perform unpaired t-test, with a p-value ˂ 0,05 considered significant. Results: Mean LP I: 3 ± 1 min.; LP II: 10 ± 2 min. Procedure duration: 49 ± 5 min. Recovery time without RA, (R1): 55 ± 15 min., compared to 18 min., with RA (R2a) to ambulant position (with severe discoordination), requiring additional time until full recovery (ready for release): ± 45 min (R2b). Total time, to release (R2a/b): mean ± SD = 67 ± 13.85 min. Concluding for clinical relevance that the association of Ketamine and Dexmedetomidine performed satisfactorily, providing effective sedation and analgesia, and relative short latency periods. Used RA did not shorten total recovery time significantly (P-value = 0,7328). Adverse effects such as the risk of acute cecal tympany, due to the lack of pre-anesthetic fasting, concurrent to collateral effects of injectable and volatile anesthetics on the motility of the digestive tract, and induced bradycardia/hyperthermia warrant extra caution. The employed RDDS provided reliable drug delivery under field conditions.
id SBMV-1_39e19ac6bb991b7506aed5350126c988
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.rbmv.org:article/1072
network_acronym_str SBMV-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine
repository_id_str
spelling Chemical immobilization of free-living capybaras (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) using ketamine-dexmedetomidine combination and a remote drug delivery systemImobilização química de capivaras de vida livre (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) usando a combinação cetamina-dexmedetomidina e um sistema de administração remota de medicamentosRDDS, contenção química, sinantrópicas, atipamezol, capivara.RDDS, wildlife chemical restraint, atipamezole, capybara.Capturing wild capybaras for scientific projects, population control or medical interventions is a growing necessity. With this study, we intended to evaluate a Ketamine/Dexmedetomidine as a reversible chemical restraint in free-ranging synanthropic capybaras, seeking enhanced anesthetic and recovery characteristics while testing a specialized remote drug delivery system (RDDS). For this purpose, 18 adult capybaras (male n = 8; females n = 10) (67.3 ± 9.45 kg), prior to chemical restraint, were physically confined, subsequently darted intramuscularly with 9 mg kg-1 ketamine and 0,005 mg kg-1 dexmedetomidine. Post-intervention, 0,005 mg kg-1 atipamezole, administered IM, was used as a reversal agent (RA), (n = 5). Anesthetic effects were recorded as latency period (LP I/first observed effects) (LP II /lateral recumbency plus time to handle the animal). Recovery time was divided into (R1/no RA, fully recovered/ready for release), (R2a/R2b, with RA, time to ambulant position plus time to full recovery/release, respectively). Vital signs were recorded at a 15-minute interval. GraphPad Prism 8.1.1 was used to perform unpaired t-test, with a p-value ˂ 0,05 considered significant. Results: Mean LP I: 3 ± 1 min.; LP II: 10 ± 2 min. Procedure duration: 49 ± 5 min. Recovery time without RA, (R1): 55 ± 15 min., compared to 18 min., with RA (R2a) to ambulant position (with severe discoordination), requiring additional time until full recovery (ready for release): ± 45 min (R2b). Total time, to release (R2a/b): mean ± SD = 67 ± 13.85 min. Concluding for clinical relevance that the association of Ketamine and Dexmedetomidine performed satisfactorily, providing effective sedation and analgesia, and relative short latency periods. Used RA did not shorten total recovery time significantly (P-value = 0,7328). Adverse effects such as the risk of acute cecal tympany, due to the lack of pre-anesthetic fasting, concurrent to collateral effects of injectable and volatile anesthetics on the motility of the digestive tract, and induced bradycardia/hyperthermia warrant extra caution. The employed RDDS provided reliable drug delivery under field conditions.Capturar capivaras selvagens para projetos científicos, controle populacional ou intervenções médicas é uma necessidade crescente. Com este estudo, pretendemos avaliar uma associação de cetamina / dexmedetomidina como uma contenção química reversível em capivaras sinantrópicas de vida livre, buscando melhorar as características anestésicas e de recuperação e, ao mesmo tempo, testar um sistema remoto de liberação controlada de medicamentos (RDDS). Para tanto, 18 capivaras adultas (machos n = 8; fêmeas n = 10) (67,3 ± 9,45 kg), antes da contenção química, foram fisicamente confinadas, e receberam dardos por via intramuscular com 9 mg kg-1 de cetamina e 0,005 mg kg-1. dexmedetomidina. Após a intervenção, 0,005 mg kg-1 de atipamezol foi administrado via IM, e utilizado como agente de reversão (RA), (n = 5). Os efeitos anestésicos foram registrados como período de latência (LP I / primeiros efeitos observados) (LP II / decúbito lateral mais tempo para manipular o animal). O tempo de recuperação foi dividido em (R1 / sem AR, totalmente recuperado / pronto para liberação da contenção física), (R2a / R2b, com AR, tempo para deambular mais tempo para recuperação total / liberação, respectivamente). Os sinais vitais foram registrados em um intervalo de 15 minutos. O GraphPad Prism 8.1.1 foi utilizado para realizar o teste t não pareado, com um valor p ˂ 0,05 considerado significativo. Resultados: LP médio I: 3 ± 1 min; LP II: 10 ± 2 min. Duração do procedimento: 49 ± 5 min. Tempo de recuperação sem AR, (R1): 55 ± 15 min., Em comparação aos 18min, com AR (R2a) até em posição para caminhar (com descoordenação grave), necessitou de tempo adicional até a recuperação completa (pronto para liberação): ± 45 min (R2b) . Tempo total, para liberação (R2a / b): média ± DP = 67 ± 13,85 min. Concluiu-se, por relevância clínica, que a associação de cetamina e dexmedetomidina teve um desempenho satisfatório, proporcionando sedação e analgesia eficazes e períodos relativamente curtos de latência. A RA utilizada não reduziu significativamente o tempo total de recuperação (valor P = 0,7328). Os efeitos adversos, como o risco de timpanismo no ceco agudo, devido à falta de jejum pré-anestésico, concomitante aos efeitos colaterais dos anestésicos injetáveis ​​e voláteis sobre a motilidade do trato digestivo, e bradicardia / hipertermia induzida, exigem cautela extra. O RDDS utilizado forneceu entrega confiável de medicamentos em condições de campo.Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.2021-05-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpeer reviewedAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/107210.29374/2527-2179.bjvm107220Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine; Vol. 42 No. 1 (2020); e107220Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterinária; v. 42 n. 1 (2020); e1072202527-21790100-2430reponame:Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicineinstname:Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (SOMVERJ)instacron:SBMVenghttps://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/1072/984Copyright (c) 2020 DEREK ROSENFIELD, Mario Ferraro, Claudia Igayara, Silvia Renata Gaigo Cortopassi, Cristiane Schilbach Pizzuttohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessROSENFIELD, DEREKFerraro, MarioIgayara, ClaudiaGaigo Cortopassi, Silvia RenataSchilbach Pizzutto, Cristiane2021-05-13T13:46:40Zoai:ojs.rbmv.org:article/1072Revistahttps://rbmv.org/BJVMONGhttps://rbmv.org/BJVM/oaicontato.rbmv@gmail.com2527-21790100-2430opendoar:2021-05-13T13:46:40Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine - Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (SOMVERJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Chemical immobilization of free-living capybaras (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) using ketamine-dexmedetomidine combination and a remote drug delivery system
Imobilização química de capivaras de vida livre (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) usando a combinação cetamina-dexmedetomidina e um sistema de administração remota de medicamentos
title Chemical immobilization of free-living capybaras (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) using ketamine-dexmedetomidine combination and a remote drug delivery system
spellingShingle Chemical immobilization of free-living capybaras (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) using ketamine-dexmedetomidine combination and a remote drug delivery system
ROSENFIELD, DEREK
RDDS, contenção química, sinantrópicas, atipamezol, capivara.
RDDS, wildlife chemical restraint, atipamezole, capybara.
title_short Chemical immobilization of free-living capybaras (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) using ketamine-dexmedetomidine combination and a remote drug delivery system
title_full Chemical immobilization of free-living capybaras (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) using ketamine-dexmedetomidine combination and a remote drug delivery system
title_fullStr Chemical immobilization of free-living capybaras (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) using ketamine-dexmedetomidine combination and a remote drug delivery system
title_full_unstemmed Chemical immobilization of free-living capybaras (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) using ketamine-dexmedetomidine combination and a remote drug delivery system
title_sort Chemical immobilization of free-living capybaras (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) using ketamine-dexmedetomidine combination and a remote drug delivery system
author ROSENFIELD, DEREK
author_facet ROSENFIELD, DEREK
Ferraro, Mario
Igayara, Claudia
Gaigo Cortopassi, Silvia Renata
Schilbach Pizzutto, Cristiane
author_role author
author2 Ferraro, Mario
Igayara, Claudia
Gaigo Cortopassi, Silvia Renata
Schilbach Pizzutto, Cristiane
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv ROSENFIELD, DEREK
Ferraro, Mario
Igayara, Claudia
Gaigo Cortopassi, Silvia Renata
Schilbach Pizzutto, Cristiane
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv RDDS, contenção química, sinantrópicas, atipamezol, capivara.
RDDS, wildlife chemical restraint, atipamezole, capybara.
topic RDDS, contenção química, sinantrópicas, atipamezol, capivara.
RDDS, wildlife chemical restraint, atipamezole, capybara.
description Capturing wild capybaras for scientific projects, population control or medical interventions is a growing necessity. With this study, we intended to evaluate a Ketamine/Dexmedetomidine as a reversible chemical restraint in free-ranging synanthropic capybaras, seeking enhanced anesthetic and recovery characteristics while testing a specialized remote drug delivery system (RDDS). For this purpose, 18 adult capybaras (male n = 8; females n = 10) (67.3 ± 9.45 kg), prior to chemical restraint, were physically confined, subsequently darted intramuscularly with 9 mg kg-1 ketamine and 0,005 mg kg-1 dexmedetomidine. Post-intervention, 0,005 mg kg-1 atipamezole, administered IM, was used as a reversal agent (RA), (n = 5). Anesthetic effects were recorded as latency period (LP I/first observed effects) (LP II /lateral recumbency plus time to handle the animal). Recovery time was divided into (R1/no RA, fully recovered/ready for release), (R2a/R2b, with RA, time to ambulant position plus time to full recovery/release, respectively). Vital signs were recorded at a 15-minute interval. GraphPad Prism 8.1.1 was used to perform unpaired t-test, with a p-value ˂ 0,05 considered significant. Results: Mean LP I: 3 ± 1 min.; LP II: 10 ± 2 min. Procedure duration: 49 ± 5 min. Recovery time without RA, (R1): 55 ± 15 min., compared to 18 min., with RA (R2a) to ambulant position (with severe discoordination), requiring additional time until full recovery (ready for release): ± 45 min (R2b). Total time, to release (R2a/b): mean ± SD = 67 ± 13.85 min. Concluding for clinical relevance that the association of Ketamine and Dexmedetomidine performed satisfactorily, providing effective sedation and analgesia, and relative short latency periods. Used RA did not shorten total recovery time significantly (P-value = 0,7328). Adverse effects such as the risk of acute cecal tympany, due to the lack of pre-anesthetic fasting, concurrent to collateral effects of injectable and volatile anesthetics on the motility of the digestive tract, and induced bradycardia/hyperthermia warrant extra caution. The employed RDDS provided reliable drug delivery under field conditions.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
peer reviewed
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/1072
10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm107220
url https://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/1072
identifier_str_mv 10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm107220
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/1072/984
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine; Vol. 42 No. 1 (2020); e107220
Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterinária; v. 42 n. 1 (2020); e107220
2527-2179
0100-2430
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine
instname:Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (SOMVERJ)
instacron:SBMV
instname_str Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (SOMVERJ)
instacron_str SBMV
institution SBMV
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine
collection Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine - Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (SOMVERJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv contato.rbmv@gmail.com
_version_ 1798313110638952448