Effect of standard and neutral-pH peritoneal dialysis solutions upon fibroblasts proliferation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-28002014000200150 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Continuous exposition of the peritoneal membrane to conventional dialysis solutions is an important risk factor for inducing structural and functional alterations. Objective: To compare in vitro mouse fibroblast NIH-3T3 cell viability after exposition to a neutral pH dialysis solution in comparison to cells exposed to a standard solution. Methods: Experimental study to compare the effects of a conventional standard or a neutral-pH, low-glucose degradation products peritoneal dialysis solution on the viability of exposed fibroblasts in cell culture. Both solutions were tested in all the commercially available glucose concentrations. Cell viability was evaluated with tetrazolium salt colorimetric assay. Results: Fibroblast viability was significantly superior in the neutral pH solution in comparison to control, in all three glucose concentrations (Optical density in nm-means ± SD: 1.5% 0.295 ± 0.047 vs. 0.372 ± 0.042, p < 0.001; 2.3% 0.270 ± 0.036 vs. 0.337 ± 0.051, p < 0.001; 4.25% 0.284 ± 0.037 vs. 0.332 ± 0.032, p < 0.001; control vs. neutral pH respectively, Student t Test). There was no significant difference in cell viability between the three concentrations of glucose when standard solution was used (ANOVA p = 0.218), although cell viability was higher after exposition to neutral pH peritoneal dialysis fluid at 1.5% in comparison to 2.3 and 4.25% glucose concentrations (ANOVA p = 0.008: Bonferroni 1.5% vs. 2.3% p = 0.033, 1.5% vs. 4.25% p = 0.014, 2.3% vs. 4.25% p = 1.00). Conclusion: Cell viability was better in neutral pH dialysis solution, especially in the lower glucose concentration. A more physiological pH and lower glucose degradation products may be responsible for such results. |
id |
SBN-1_22a816220b58e11f3503b8238e334c94 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0101-28002014000200150 |
network_acronym_str |
SBN-1 |
network_name_str |
Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Effect of standard and neutral-pH peritoneal dialysis solutions upon fibroblasts proliferationcell culture techniquesfibroblastsmaterials testingperitoneal dialysis Introduction: Continuous exposition of the peritoneal membrane to conventional dialysis solutions is an important risk factor for inducing structural and functional alterations. Objective: To compare in vitro mouse fibroblast NIH-3T3 cell viability after exposition to a neutral pH dialysis solution in comparison to cells exposed to a standard solution. Methods: Experimental study to compare the effects of a conventional standard or a neutral-pH, low-glucose degradation products peritoneal dialysis solution on the viability of exposed fibroblasts in cell culture. Both solutions were tested in all the commercially available glucose concentrations. Cell viability was evaluated with tetrazolium salt colorimetric assay. Results: Fibroblast viability was significantly superior in the neutral pH solution in comparison to control, in all three glucose concentrations (Optical density in nm-means ± SD: 1.5% 0.295 ± 0.047 vs. 0.372 ± 0.042, p < 0.001; 2.3% 0.270 ± 0.036 vs. 0.337 ± 0.051, p < 0.001; 4.25% 0.284 ± 0.037 vs. 0.332 ± 0.032, p < 0.001; control vs. neutral pH respectively, Student t Test). There was no significant difference in cell viability between the three concentrations of glucose when standard solution was used (ANOVA p = 0.218), although cell viability was higher after exposition to neutral pH peritoneal dialysis fluid at 1.5% in comparison to 2.3 and 4.25% glucose concentrations (ANOVA p = 0.008: Bonferroni 1.5% vs. 2.3% p = 0.033, 1.5% vs. 4.25% p = 0.014, 2.3% vs. 4.25% p = 1.00). Conclusion: Cell viability was better in neutral pH dialysis solution, especially in the lower glucose concentration. A more physiological pH and lower glucose degradation products may be responsible for such results. Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia2014-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-28002014000200150Brazilian Journal of Nephrology v.36 n.2 2014reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologiainstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia (SBN)instacron:SBN10.5935/0101-2800.20140024info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPoitevin,André AntunesViezzer,ChristianMachado,Denise CantarelliCosta,Bartira Ercilia Pinheiro daFigueiredo,Ana Elizabethd'Avila,DomingosPoli-de-Figueiredo,Carlos Eduardoeng2014-12-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-28002014000200150Revistahttp://www.bjn.org.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jbn@sbn.org.br2175-82390101-2800opendoar:2014-12-10T00:00Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia - Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia (SBN)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of standard and neutral-pH peritoneal dialysis solutions upon fibroblasts proliferation |
title |
Effect of standard and neutral-pH peritoneal dialysis solutions upon fibroblasts proliferation |
spellingShingle |
Effect of standard and neutral-pH peritoneal dialysis solutions upon fibroblasts proliferation Poitevin,André Antunes cell culture techniques fibroblasts materials testing peritoneal dialysis |
title_short |
Effect of standard and neutral-pH peritoneal dialysis solutions upon fibroblasts proliferation |
title_full |
Effect of standard and neutral-pH peritoneal dialysis solutions upon fibroblasts proliferation |
title_fullStr |
Effect of standard and neutral-pH peritoneal dialysis solutions upon fibroblasts proliferation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of standard and neutral-pH peritoneal dialysis solutions upon fibroblasts proliferation |
title_sort |
Effect of standard and neutral-pH peritoneal dialysis solutions upon fibroblasts proliferation |
author |
Poitevin,André Antunes |
author_facet |
Poitevin,André Antunes Viezzer,Christian Machado,Denise Cantarelli Costa,Bartira Ercilia Pinheiro da Figueiredo,Ana Elizabeth d'Avila,Domingos Poli-de-Figueiredo,Carlos Eduardo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Viezzer,Christian Machado,Denise Cantarelli Costa,Bartira Ercilia Pinheiro da Figueiredo,Ana Elizabeth d'Avila,Domingos Poli-de-Figueiredo,Carlos Eduardo |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Poitevin,André Antunes Viezzer,Christian Machado,Denise Cantarelli Costa,Bartira Ercilia Pinheiro da Figueiredo,Ana Elizabeth d'Avila,Domingos Poli-de-Figueiredo,Carlos Eduardo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
cell culture techniques fibroblasts materials testing peritoneal dialysis |
topic |
cell culture techniques fibroblasts materials testing peritoneal dialysis |
description |
Introduction: Continuous exposition of the peritoneal membrane to conventional dialysis solutions is an important risk factor for inducing structural and functional alterations. Objective: To compare in vitro mouse fibroblast NIH-3T3 cell viability after exposition to a neutral pH dialysis solution in comparison to cells exposed to a standard solution. Methods: Experimental study to compare the effects of a conventional standard or a neutral-pH, low-glucose degradation products peritoneal dialysis solution on the viability of exposed fibroblasts in cell culture. Both solutions were tested in all the commercially available glucose concentrations. Cell viability was evaluated with tetrazolium salt colorimetric assay. Results: Fibroblast viability was significantly superior in the neutral pH solution in comparison to control, in all three glucose concentrations (Optical density in nm-means ± SD: 1.5% 0.295 ± 0.047 vs. 0.372 ± 0.042, p < 0.001; 2.3% 0.270 ± 0.036 vs. 0.337 ± 0.051, p < 0.001; 4.25% 0.284 ± 0.037 vs. 0.332 ± 0.032, p < 0.001; control vs. neutral pH respectively, Student t Test). There was no significant difference in cell viability between the three concentrations of glucose when standard solution was used (ANOVA p = 0.218), although cell viability was higher after exposition to neutral pH peritoneal dialysis fluid at 1.5% in comparison to 2.3 and 4.25% glucose concentrations (ANOVA p = 0.008: Bonferroni 1.5% vs. 2.3% p = 0.033, 1.5% vs. 4.25% p = 0.014, 2.3% vs. 4.25% p = 1.00). Conclusion: Cell viability was better in neutral pH dialysis solution, especially in the lower glucose concentration. A more physiological pH and lower glucose degradation products may be responsible for such results. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-28002014000200150 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-28002014000200150 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5935/0101-2800.20140024 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Nephrology v.36 n.2 2014 reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia (SBN) instacron:SBN |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia (SBN) |
instacron_str |
SBN |
institution |
SBN |
reponame_str |
Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia |
collection |
Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia - Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia (SBN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||jbn@sbn.org.br |
_version_ |
1752122063394439168 |