Comparison between OPD-scan results and contrast sensitivity of three intraocular lenses: spheric AcrySof SN60AT, aspheric AcrySof SN60WF and multifocal AcrySof Restor lens

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nakano,Celso Takashi
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Hida,Wilson Takashi, Kara-Jose Junior,Newton, Motta,Antonio Francisco Pimenta, Fante,Danilo, Masson,Victor Ferreira, Reis,Alexandre, Pamplona,Mauricio, Yamane,Iris de Souza, Holzchuh,Ricardo, Avakian,Amaryllis
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802009000400006
Resumo: Purpose: Compare the OPD-scan results and the contrast sensitivity in patients who had implantation of the AcrySof SN60D3 multifocal IOL, the AcrySof SA60AT spheric monofocal IOL and the AcrySof SN60AT aspheric monofocal IOL. Methods: Thirty-two eyes received the multifocal IOL, 32 eyes received the spheric monofocal IOL and 32 eyes received the aspheric monofocal IOL. They were closely paired in age, sex, pre-operative wavefront analysis and contrast sensitivity. All patients was tested with the OPD-scan aberrometer, ETDRS chart at 100% and 9% contrasts and contrast sensitivity. Results: Statistically significant differences were detected more total aberration in SN60AT group (KW = 9.42; p=0.009) when compared to SN60D3 group (p=0.016) and SN60WF group (p=0.0047). The SN60AT group (KW = 16.20; p=0.0003) showed with high spherical aberration values compared to the SN60WF (p=0.00046) and SN60D3 (p=0.0014) group. No significant differences were found between groups in far-distance VA measured using ETDRS at 100% and 9% contrast. The SN60D3 group compared to SN60AT group (p=0.016) had low contrast sensitivity (log units) with statistical difference in 6.0 cpd (KW = 7.84; p=0.0199), but no statistical difference between SN60WF and SN60AT group (p=0.91) and SN60WF and SN60D3 group (p=0.051). The SN60D3 group had low contrast sensitivity performed under mesopic conditions (KW = 10.79; p=0,0045) in 6cpd spatial frequency compared to the SN60AT group (p=0.011) and to the SN60WF group (p=0.007) with statistical significant differences. Conclusion: In all analyzed parameters of OPD-scan aberrometry the aspheric and the multifocal IOLs provided less total and spherical aberrations than spheric IOLs. All IOLs provided an excellent high and low contrasts vision, the multifocal IOL was as good as the spheric and aspheric monofocal IOLs.
id SBO-1_fed8cf6524561842ed34f540db22e951
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-72802009000400006
network_acronym_str SBO-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison between OPD-scan results and contrast sensitivity of three intraocular lenses: spheric AcrySof SN60AT, aspheric AcrySof SN60WF and multifocal AcrySof Restor lensLensesLenses, intraocularContrast sensitivityPhacoemulsificationVisionPurpose: Compare the OPD-scan results and the contrast sensitivity in patients who had implantation of the AcrySof SN60D3 multifocal IOL, the AcrySof SA60AT spheric monofocal IOL and the AcrySof SN60AT aspheric monofocal IOL. Methods: Thirty-two eyes received the multifocal IOL, 32 eyes received the spheric monofocal IOL and 32 eyes received the aspheric monofocal IOL. They were closely paired in age, sex, pre-operative wavefront analysis and contrast sensitivity. All patients was tested with the OPD-scan aberrometer, ETDRS chart at 100% and 9% contrasts and contrast sensitivity. Results: Statistically significant differences were detected more total aberration in SN60AT group (KW = 9.42; p=0.009) when compared to SN60D3 group (p=0.016) and SN60WF group (p=0.0047). The SN60AT group (KW = 16.20; p=0.0003) showed with high spherical aberration values compared to the SN60WF (p=0.00046) and SN60D3 (p=0.0014) group. No significant differences were found between groups in far-distance VA measured using ETDRS at 100% and 9% contrast. The SN60D3 group compared to SN60AT group (p=0.016) had low contrast sensitivity (log units) with statistical difference in 6.0 cpd (KW = 7.84; p=0.0199), but no statistical difference between SN60WF and SN60AT group (p=0.91) and SN60WF and SN60D3 group (p=0.051). The SN60D3 group had low contrast sensitivity performed under mesopic conditions (KW = 10.79; p=0,0045) in 6cpd spatial frequency compared to the SN60AT group (p=0.011) and to the SN60WF group (p=0.007) with statistical significant differences. Conclusion: In all analyzed parameters of OPD-scan aberrometry the aspheric and the multifocal IOLs provided less total and spherical aberrations than spheric IOLs. All IOLs provided an excellent high and low contrasts vision, the multifocal IOL was as good as the spheric and aspheric monofocal IOLs.Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia2009-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802009000400006Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia v.68 n.4 2009reponame:Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia (SBO)instacron:SBO10.1590/S0034-72802009000400006info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNakano,Celso TakashiHida,Wilson TakashiKara-Jose Junior,NewtonMotta,Antonio Francisco PimentaFante,DaniloMasson,Victor FerreiraReis,AlexandrePamplona,MauricioYamane,Iris de SouzaHolzchuh,RicardoAvakian,Amarylliseng2009-11-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-72802009000400006Revistahttps://rbo.emnuvens.com.br/rbo/indexhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpsob@sboportal.org.br||rbo@sboportal.org.br1982-85510034-7280opendoar:2009-11-06T00:00Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia (SBO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison between OPD-scan results and contrast sensitivity of three intraocular lenses: spheric AcrySof SN60AT, aspheric AcrySof SN60WF and multifocal AcrySof Restor lens
title Comparison between OPD-scan results and contrast sensitivity of three intraocular lenses: spheric AcrySof SN60AT, aspheric AcrySof SN60WF and multifocal AcrySof Restor lens
spellingShingle Comparison between OPD-scan results and contrast sensitivity of three intraocular lenses: spheric AcrySof SN60AT, aspheric AcrySof SN60WF and multifocal AcrySof Restor lens
Nakano,Celso Takashi
Lenses
Lenses, intraocular
Contrast sensitivity
Phacoemulsification
Vision
title_short Comparison between OPD-scan results and contrast sensitivity of three intraocular lenses: spheric AcrySof SN60AT, aspheric AcrySof SN60WF and multifocal AcrySof Restor lens
title_full Comparison between OPD-scan results and contrast sensitivity of three intraocular lenses: spheric AcrySof SN60AT, aspheric AcrySof SN60WF and multifocal AcrySof Restor lens
title_fullStr Comparison between OPD-scan results and contrast sensitivity of three intraocular lenses: spheric AcrySof SN60AT, aspheric AcrySof SN60WF and multifocal AcrySof Restor lens
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between OPD-scan results and contrast sensitivity of three intraocular lenses: spheric AcrySof SN60AT, aspheric AcrySof SN60WF and multifocal AcrySof Restor lens
title_sort Comparison between OPD-scan results and contrast sensitivity of three intraocular lenses: spheric AcrySof SN60AT, aspheric AcrySof SN60WF and multifocal AcrySof Restor lens
author Nakano,Celso Takashi
author_facet Nakano,Celso Takashi
Hida,Wilson Takashi
Kara-Jose Junior,Newton
Motta,Antonio Francisco Pimenta
Fante,Danilo
Masson,Victor Ferreira
Reis,Alexandre
Pamplona,Mauricio
Yamane,Iris de Souza
Holzchuh,Ricardo
Avakian,Amaryllis
author_role author
author2 Hida,Wilson Takashi
Kara-Jose Junior,Newton
Motta,Antonio Francisco Pimenta
Fante,Danilo
Masson,Victor Ferreira
Reis,Alexandre
Pamplona,Mauricio
Yamane,Iris de Souza
Holzchuh,Ricardo
Avakian,Amaryllis
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nakano,Celso Takashi
Hida,Wilson Takashi
Kara-Jose Junior,Newton
Motta,Antonio Francisco Pimenta
Fante,Danilo
Masson,Victor Ferreira
Reis,Alexandre
Pamplona,Mauricio
Yamane,Iris de Souza
Holzchuh,Ricardo
Avakian,Amaryllis
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Lenses
Lenses, intraocular
Contrast sensitivity
Phacoemulsification
Vision
topic Lenses
Lenses, intraocular
Contrast sensitivity
Phacoemulsification
Vision
description Purpose: Compare the OPD-scan results and the contrast sensitivity in patients who had implantation of the AcrySof SN60D3 multifocal IOL, the AcrySof SA60AT spheric monofocal IOL and the AcrySof SN60AT aspheric monofocal IOL. Methods: Thirty-two eyes received the multifocal IOL, 32 eyes received the spheric monofocal IOL and 32 eyes received the aspheric monofocal IOL. They were closely paired in age, sex, pre-operative wavefront analysis and contrast sensitivity. All patients was tested with the OPD-scan aberrometer, ETDRS chart at 100% and 9% contrasts and contrast sensitivity. Results: Statistically significant differences were detected more total aberration in SN60AT group (KW = 9.42; p=0.009) when compared to SN60D3 group (p=0.016) and SN60WF group (p=0.0047). The SN60AT group (KW = 16.20; p=0.0003) showed with high spherical aberration values compared to the SN60WF (p=0.00046) and SN60D3 (p=0.0014) group. No significant differences were found between groups in far-distance VA measured using ETDRS at 100% and 9% contrast. The SN60D3 group compared to SN60AT group (p=0.016) had low contrast sensitivity (log units) with statistical difference in 6.0 cpd (KW = 7.84; p=0.0199), but no statistical difference between SN60WF and SN60AT group (p=0.91) and SN60WF and SN60D3 group (p=0.051). The SN60D3 group had low contrast sensitivity performed under mesopic conditions (KW = 10.79; p=0,0045) in 6cpd spatial frequency compared to the SN60AT group (p=0.011) and to the SN60WF group (p=0.007) with statistical significant differences. Conclusion: In all analyzed parameters of OPD-scan aberrometry the aspheric and the multifocal IOLs provided less total and spherical aberrations than spheric IOLs. All IOLs provided an excellent high and low contrasts vision, the multifocal IOL was as good as the spheric and aspheric monofocal IOLs.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802009000400006
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802009000400006
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0034-72802009000400006
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia v.68 n.4 2009
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia (SBO)
instacron:SBO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia (SBO)
instacron_str SBO
institution SBO
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia (SBO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sob@sboportal.org.br||rbo@sboportal.org.br
_version_ 1752122335504105472