Efficacy of three different methods for side port incision wound sealing

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kashiwabuchi,Fabiana K.
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Khan,Yasin A., Rodrigues Jr,Murilo W., Wang,Jiangxia, McDonnell,Peter J., Daoud,Yassine J.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802013000600005
Resumo: PURPOSE: To evaluate wound leakage and bacteria-sized particle influx in differently corneal sealed side port incisions. METHODS: Four 1.5mm tunnel squared incisions were created in each of four cadaveric human eyes. In each cornea, one incision was left unsealed, whereas the other three incisions were sealed using a 10-0 nylon suture, cyanoacrylate glue, or stromal hydration, respectively. A Seidel and an India ink test were performed on each eye. During each Seidel test, flourescein was applied, the IOP increased from 15 to 80mmHg, and the IOP at which each incision started to leak recorded. During each India ink test, ink was placed on the eye and rinsed out with balanced salt solution (BSS). Ink penetration was then measured by planimetry at physiologic conditions and after an IOP plunge from 80mmHg to 0mmHg. RESULTS: Regardless of IOP variations, no leakage or ink inflow was observed through the glued incisions. In contrast, leakage did occur in the other three sealing methods, albeit at significantly different IOP levels in each one (p=0.013). Ink inflow occurred in these sealing methods at physiologic IOP and, to a significantly greater extent, after the IOP challenge (p<0.05). At both of these IOP conditions, the differences in ink influx among these three incision-sealing methods were deemed statistically insignificant. CONCLUSION: This study showed that glue was more effective at preventing wound leakage and bacteria-sized particle influx than other commonly used methods especially hydrosealing.
id SBO-1_ff5c9f3752a2fadacc3de0ec9006fb86
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-72802013000600005
network_acronym_str SBO-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Efficacy of three different methods for side port incision wound sealingEndophthalmitisCataract extractionLimbus corneaeIntraocular pressureBiomechanicsEndoftalmiteExtração de catarataLimbo da córneaPressão intraocularBiomecânicaPURPOSE: To evaluate wound leakage and bacteria-sized particle influx in differently corneal sealed side port incisions. METHODS: Four 1.5mm tunnel squared incisions were created in each of four cadaveric human eyes. In each cornea, one incision was left unsealed, whereas the other three incisions were sealed using a 10-0 nylon suture, cyanoacrylate glue, or stromal hydration, respectively. A Seidel and an India ink test were performed on each eye. During each Seidel test, flourescein was applied, the IOP increased from 15 to 80mmHg, and the IOP at which each incision started to leak recorded. During each India ink test, ink was placed on the eye and rinsed out with balanced salt solution (BSS). Ink penetration was then measured by planimetry at physiologic conditions and after an IOP plunge from 80mmHg to 0mmHg. RESULTS: Regardless of IOP variations, no leakage or ink inflow was observed through the glued incisions. In contrast, leakage did occur in the other three sealing methods, albeit at significantly different IOP levels in each one (p=0.013). Ink inflow occurred in these sealing methods at physiologic IOP and, to a significantly greater extent, after the IOP challenge (p<0.05). At both of these IOP conditions, the differences in ink influx among these three incision-sealing methods were deemed statistically insignificant. CONCLUSION: This study showed that glue was more effective at preventing wound leakage and bacteria-sized particle influx than other commonly used methods especially hydrosealing.Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia2013-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802013000600005Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia v.72 n.6 2013reponame:Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia (SBO)instacron:SBO10.1590/S0034-72802013000600005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKashiwabuchi,Fabiana K.Khan,Yasin A.Rodrigues Jr,Murilo W.Wang,JiangxiaMcDonnell,Peter J.Daoud,Yassine J.eng2014-03-25T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-72802013000600005Revistahttps://rbo.emnuvens.com.br/rbo/indexhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpsob@sboportal.org.br||rbo@sboportal.org.br1982-85510034-7280opendoar:2014-03-25T00:00Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia (SBO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Efficacy of three different methods for side port incision wound sealing
title Efficacy of three different methods for side port incision wound sealing
spellingShingle Efficacy of three different methods for side port incision wound sealing
Kashiwabuchi,Fabiana K.
Endophthalmitis
Cataract extraction
Limbus corneae
Intraocular pressure
Biomechanics
Endoftalmite
Extração de catarata
Limbo da córnea
Pressão intraocular
Biomecânica
title_short Efficacy of three different methods for side port incision wound sealing
title_full Efficacy of three different methods for side port incision wound sealing
title_fullStr Efficacy of three different methods for side port incision wound sealing
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of three different methods for side port incision wound sealing
title_sort Efficacy of three different methods for side port incision wound sealing
author Kashiwabuchi,Fabiana K.
author_facet Kashiwabuchi,Fabiana K.
Khan,Yasin A.
Rodrigues Jr,Murilo W.
Wang,Jiangxia
McDonnell,Peter J.
Daoud,Yassine J.
author_role author
author2 Khan,Yasin A.
Rodrigues Jr,Murilo W.
Wang,Jiangxia
McDonnell,Peter J.
Daoud,Yassine J.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kashiwabuchi,Fabiana K.
Khan,Yasin A.
Rodrigues Jr,Murilo W.
Wang,Jiangxia
McDonnell,Peter J.
Daoud,Yassine J.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Endophthalmitis
Cataract extraction
Limbus corneae
Intraocular pressure
Biomechanics
Endoftalmite
Extração de catarata
Limbo da córnea
Pressão intraocular
Biomecânica
topic Endophthalmitis
Cataract extraction
Limbus corneae
Intraocular pressure
Biomechanics
Endoftalmite
Extração de catarata
Limbo da córnea
Pressão intraocular
Biomecânica
description PURPOSE: To evaluate wound leakage and bacteria-sized particle influx in differently corneal sealed side port incisions. METHODS: Four 1.5mm tunnel squared incisions were created in each of four cadaveric human eyes. In each cornea, one incision was left unsealed, whereas the other three incisions were sealed using a 10-0 nylon suture, cyanoacrylate glue, or stromal hydration, respectively. A Seidel and an India ink test were performed on each eye. During each Seidel test, flourescein was applied, the IOP increased from 15 to 80mmHg, and the IOP at which each incision started to leak recorded. During each India ink test, ink was placed on the eye and rinsed out with balanced salt solution (BSS). Ink penetration was then measured by planimetry at physiologic conditions and after an IOP plunge from 80mmHg to 0mmHg. RESULTS: Regardless of IOP variations, no leakage or ink inflow was observed through the glued incisions. In contrast, leakage did occur in the other three sealing methods, albeit at significantly different IOP levels in each one (p=0.013). Ink inflow occurred in these sealing methods at physiologic IOP and, to a significantly greater extent, after the IOP challenge (p<0.05). At both of these IOP conditions, the differences in ink influx among these three incision-sealing methods were deemed statistically insignificant. CONCLUSION: This study showed that glue was more effective at preventing wound leakage and bacteria-sized particle influx than other commonly used methods especially hydrosealing.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802013000600005
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802013000600005
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0034-72802013000600005
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia v.72 n.6 2013
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia (SBO)
instacron:SBO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia (SBO)
instacron_str SBO
institution SBO
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia (SBO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sob@sboportal.org.br||rbo@sboportal.org.br
_version_ 1752122336888225792