DETERMINANTS OF RETURN TO PLAY AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: ANDRADE,ANDRÉ LUÍS LUGNANI DE
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: SARDELI,AMANDA VEIGA, LIVANI,BRUNO, BELANGERO,WILLIAM DIAS
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522020000600303
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To systematically review and meta-analyze the performance of return to play (RTP) and non-RTP patients in different assessment tools after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLR). Methods: Out of 182 studies searched on PubMed, 11 presented RTP and non-RTP groups assessing the performance of young individuals, practitioners of different sports, with different tools. Results: There was higher limb symmetry (7.13% [95%CI 4.55; 9.70], p < 0.001), Tegner activity scale (2.41 [95%CI 0.18; 4.64], p = 0.03), functional scores such as International Knee Documentation Committee (x7.44 [95%CI 4.69; 10.19], p < 0.001), Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome score for quality of life (14.75 [95%CI 10.96; 18.54], p < 0.001) and for sports/recreation (11.86 [95%CI 8.87; 14.86], p < 0.001); and lower knee laxity (-0.25 mm [95%CI -0.36; -0.14], p < 0.001) in RTP compared to non-RTP patients following ACLR. Conclusion: We confirmed that these different tools can differentiate RTP for non-RTP patients, which may contribute to the physician’s decision about the ideal time for RTP. Level of Evidence III, Systematic review of Level III studies.
id SBOT-1_0f855bb414d207dbb617b9e5682fb83c
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1413-78522020000600303
network_acronym_str SBOT-1
network_name_str Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling DETERMINANTS OF RETURN TO PLAY AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTIONAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionSportsArthroplastyKneeABSTRACT Objective: To systematically review and meta-analyze the performance of return to play (RTP) and non-RTP patients in different assessment tools after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLR). Methods: Out of 182 studies searched on PubMed, 11 presented RTP and non-RTP groups assessing the performance of young individuals, practitioners of different sports, with different tools. Results: There was higher limb symmetry (7.13% [95%CI 4.55; 9.70], p < 0.001), Tegner activity scale (2.41 [95%CI 0.18; 4.64], p = 0.03), functional scores such as International Knee Documentation Committee (x7.44 [95%CI 4.69; 10.19], p < 0.001), Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome score for quality of life (14.75 [95%CI 10.96; 18.54], p < 0.001) and for sports/recreation (11.86 [95%CI 8.87; 14.86], p < 0.001); and lower knee laxity (-0.25 mm [95%CI -0.36; -0.14], p < 0.001) in RTP compared to non-RTP patients following ACLR. Conclusion: We confirmed that these different tools can differentiate RTP for non-RTP patients, which may contribute to the physician’s decision about the ideal time for RTP. Level of Evidence III, Systematic review of Level III studies.ATHA EDITORA2020-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522020000600303Acta Ortopédica Brasileira v.28 n.6 2020reponame:Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1590/1413-785220202806236114info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessANDRADE,ANDRÉ LUÍS LUGNANI DESARDELI,AMANDA VEIGALIVANI,BRUNOBELANGERO,WILLIAM DIASeng2020-12-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-78522020000600303Revistahttp://www.actaortopedica.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php1atha@uol.com.br||actaortopedicabrasileira@uol.com.br1809-44061413-7852opendoar:2020-12-01T00:00Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv DETERMINANTS OF RETURN TO PLAY AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION
title DETERMINANTS OF RETURN TO PLAY AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION
spellingShingle DETERMINANTS OF RETURN TO PLAY AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION
ANDRADE,ANDRÉ LUÍS LUGNANI DE
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Sports
Arthroplasty
Knee
title_short DETERMINANTS OF RETURN TO PLAY AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION
title_full DETERMINANTS OF RETURN TO PLAY AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION
title_fullStr DETERMINANTS OF RETURN TO PLAY AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION
title_full_unstemmed DETERMINANTS OF RETURN TO PLAY AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION
title_sort DETERMINANTS OF RETURN TO PLAY AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION
author ANDRADE,ANDRÉ LUÍS LUGNANI DE
author_facet ANDRADE,ANDRÉ LUÍS LUGNANI DE
SARDELI,AMANDA VEIGA
LIVANI,BRUNO
BELANGERO,WILLIAM DIAS
author_role author
author2 SARDELI,AMANDA VEIGA
LIVANI,BRUNO
BELANGERO,WILLIAM DIAS
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv ANDRADE,ANDRÉ LUÍS LUGNANI DE
SARDELI,AMANDA VEIGA
LIVANI,BRUNO
BELANGERO,WILLIAM DIAS
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Sports
Arthroplasty
Knee
topic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Sports
Arthroplasty
Knee
description ABSTRACT Objective: To systematically review and meta-analyze the performance of return to play (RTP) and non-RTP patients in different assessment tools after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLR). Methods: Out of 182 studies searched on PubMed, 11 presented RTP and non-RTP groups assessing the performance of young individuals, practitioners of different sports, with different tools. Results: There was higher limb symmetry (7.13% [95%CI 4.55; 9.70], p < 0.001), Tegner activity scale (2.41 [95%CI 0.18; 4.64], p = 0.03), functional scores such as International Knee Documentation Committee (x7.44 [95%CI 4.69; 10.19], p < 0.001), Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome score for quality of life (14.75 [95%CI 10.96; 18.54], p < 0.001) and for sports/recreation (11.86 [95%CI 8.87; 14.86], p < 0.001); and lower knee laxity (-0.25 mm [95%CI -0.36; -0.14], p < 0.001) in RTP compared to non-RTP patients following ACLR. Conclusion: We confirmed that these different tools can differentiate RTP for non-RTP patients, which may contribute to the physician’s decision about the ideal time for RTP. Level of Evidence III, Systematic review of Level III studies.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522020000600303
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522020000600303
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1413-785220202806236114
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ATHA EDITORA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ATHA EDITORA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Ortopédica Brasileira v.28 n.6 2020
reponame:Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron:SBOT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron_str SBOT
institution SBOT
reponame_str Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
collection Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv 1atha@uol.com.br||actaortopedicabrasileira@uol.com.br
_version_ 1752122276858298368

Registros relacionados