TRANSFORAMINAL INTERSOMATIC LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS: COMPARISON BETWEEN AUTOGRAFT AND CAGE IN PEEK

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: SORPRESO,RENATO SCAPUCIN
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: MARTINS,DÉLIO EULÁLIO, KANAS,MICHEL, SORPRESO,ISABEL CRISTINA ESPOSITO, ASTUR,NELSON, WAJCHENBERG,MARCELO
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522020000600296
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the postoperative outcomes of transforaminal intersomatic lumbar arthrodesis with structured iliac bone autograft and PEEK device. Methods: The total of 93 medical records of patients undergoing transforaminal intersomatic fusion between January 2012 and July 2017 with at least 1 year of postoperative follow-up, with complete medical record, containing clinical file and radiological exams, were reviewed. Results: From the medical records evaluated, 48 patients underwent the procedure with structured iliac autograft (group 1) and 45 with PEEK device (group 2). There was an improvement in functional capacity in both groups (p < 0.001), however there was no difference when comparing them (p = 0.591). Conclusion: The postoperative clinical and radiological results of lumbar arthrodesis with TLIF technique, using a structured iliac bone autograft compared to a PEEK device, were similar. Level of Evidence II, Retrospective study.
id SBOT-1_4089a9f69450ce25313e46319c1c3b94
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1413-78522020000600296
network_acronym_str SBOT-1
network_name_str Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling TRANSFORAMINAL INTERSOMATIC LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS: COMPARISON BETWEEN AUTOGRAFT AND CAGE IN PEEKSpinal FusionLaminectomyIntervertebral Disc DegenerationABSTRACT Objective: To compare the postoperative outcomes of transforaminal intersomatic lumbar arthrodesis with structured iliac bone autograft and PEEK device. Methods: The total of 93 medical records of patients undergoing transforaminal intersomatic fusion between January 2012 and July 2017 with at least 1 year of postoperative follow-up, with complete medical record, containing clinical file and radiological exams, were reviewed. Results: From the medical records evaluated, 48 patients underwent the procedure with structured iliac autograft (group 1) and 45 with PEEK device (group 2). There was an improvement in functional capacity in both groups (p < 0.001), however there was no difference when comparing them (p = 0.591). Conclusion: The postoperative clinical and radiological results of lumbar arthrodesis with TLIF technique, using a structured iliac bone autograft compared to a PEEK device, were similar. Level of Evidence II, Retrospective study.ATHA EDITORA2020-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522020000600296Acta Ortopédica Brasileira v.28 n.6 2020reponame:Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1590/1413-785220202806238460info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSORPRESO,RENATO SCAPUCINMARTINS,DÉLIO EULÁLIOKANAS,MICHELSORPRESO,ISABEL CRISTINA ESPOSITOASTUR,NELSONWAJCHENBERG,MARCELOeng2020-12-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-78522020000600296Revistahttp://www.actaortopedica.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php1atha@uol.com.br||actaortopedicabrasileira@uol.com.br1809-44061413-7852opendoar:2020-12-01T00:00Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv TRANSFORAMINAL INTERSOMATIC LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS: COMPARISON BETWEEN AUTOGRAFT AND CAGE IN PEEK
title TRANSFORAMINAL INTERSOMATIC LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS: COMPARISON BETWEEN AUTOGRAFT AND CAGE IN PEEK
spellingShingle TRANSFORAMINAL INTERSOMATIC LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS: COMPARISON BETWEEN AUTOGRAFT AND CAGE IN PEEK
SORPRESO,RENATO SCAPUCIN
Spinal Fusion
Laminectomy
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
title_short TRANSFORAMINAL INTERSOMATIC LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS: COMPARISON BETWEEN AUTOGRAFT AND CAGE IN PEEK
title_full TRANSFORAMINAL INTERSOMATIC LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS: COMPARISON BETWEEN AUTOGRAFT AND CAGE IN PEEK
title_fullStr TRANSFORAMINAL INTERSOMATIC LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS: COMPARISON BETWEEN AUTOGRAFT AND CAGE IN PEEK
title_full_unstemmed TRANSFORAMINAL INTERSOMATIC LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS: COMPARISON BETWEEN AUTOGRAFT AND CAGE IN PEEK
title_sort TRANSFORAMINAL INTERSOMATIC LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS: COMPARISON BETWEEN AUTOGRAFT AND CAGE IN PEEK
author SORPRESO,RENATO SCAPUCIN
author_facet SORPRESO,RENATO SCAPUCIN
MARTINS,DÉLIO EULÁLIO
KANAS,MICHEL
SORPRESO,ISABEL CRISTINA ESPOSITO
ASTUR,NELSON
WAJCHENBERG,MARCELO
author_role author
author2 MARTINS,DÉLIO EULÁLIO
KANAS,MICHEL
SORPRESO,ISABEL CRISTINA ESPOSITO
ASTUR,NELSON
WAJCHENBERG,MARCELO
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv SORPRESO,RENATO SCAPUCIN
MARTINS,DÉLIO EULÁLIO
KANAS,MICHEL
SORPRESO,ISABEL CRISTINA ESPOSITO
ASTUR,NELSON
WAJCHENBERG,MARCELO
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Spinal Fusion
Laminectomy
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
topic Spinal Fusion
Laminectomy
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
description ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the postoperative outcomes of transforaminal intersomatic lumbar arthrodesis with structured iliac bone autograft and PEEK device. Methods: The total of 93 medical records of patients undergoing transforaminal intersomatic fusion between January 2012 and July 2017 with at least 1 year of postoperative follow-up, with complete medical record, containing clinical file and radiological exams, were reviewed. Results: From the medical records evaluated, 48 patients underwent the procedure with structured iliac autograft (group 1) and 45 with PEEK device (group 2). There was an improvement in functional capacity in both groups (p < 0.001), however there was no difference when comparing them (p = 0.591). Conclusion: The postoperative clinical and radiological results of lumbar arthrodesis with TLIF technique, using a structured iliac bone autograft compared to a PEEK device, were similar. Level of Evidence II, Retrospective study.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522020000600296
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522020000600296
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1413-785220202806238460
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ATHA EDITORA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ATHA EDITORA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Ortopédica Brasileira v.28 n.6 2020
reponame:Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron:SBOT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron_str SBOT
institution SBOT
reponame_str Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
collection Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv 1atha@uol.com.br||actaortopedicabrasileira@uol.com.br
_version_ 1752122276857249792

Registros relacionados