BIOMECHANICS OF BONE BLOCK GRAFT MODELS OF DIFFERENT GEOMETRY

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barbieri,Cláudio Henrique
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Garcia-Mandarano Filho,Luiz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522019000300136
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the mechanical behavior of different geometry bone block grafts in wooden models. Methods: Constructs with rectangular (G1) and trapezoidal (G2) profile “grafts”, fixed with 3.5 mm 8-hole dynamic compression plates were submitted to non-destructive bending, with the load applied alternately on the same surface as that of the plate fixation (upper) and on the opposite surface (lower), and torsion tests. A 50 N maximum load for bending and a 5° maximum deformation for torsion were considered. Rigidity (N/mm) was recorded for the former and torque (N.m) was recorded for the latter. Results: Rigidity was consistently higher in G2 than in G1, but not significantly so for all comparisons. The exception was for the load applied on the same surface of plate fixation, significantly higher in G1 than in G2. Torque was higher in G1, but not significantly so. Conclusion: The two different-profile “grafts” present a similar mechanical behavior and can be indistinctly used in clinical practice. Level of evidence V, specialist's opinion based on basic studies.
id SBOT-1_a28dcd870168042588dc0160dede44f5
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1413-78522019000300136
network_acronym_str SBOT-1
network_name_str Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling BIOMECHANICS OF BONE BLOCK GRAFT MODELS OF DIFFERENT GEOMETRYInternal fixation of fracturesBone transplantationComplicationsPseudarthrosisABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the mechanical behavior of different geometry bone block grafts in wooden models. Methods: Constructs with rectangular (G1) and trapezoidal (G2) profile “grafts”, fixed with 3.5 mm 8-hole dynamic compression plates were submitted to non-destructive bending, with the load applied alternately on the same surface as that of the plate fixation (upper) and on the opposite surface (lower), and torsion tests. A 50 N maximum load for bending and a 5° maximum deformation for torsion were considered. Rigidity (N/mm) was recorded for the former and torque (N.m) was recorded for the latter. Results: Rigidity was consistently higher in G2 than in G1, but not significantly so for all comparisons. The exception was for the load applied on the same surface of plate fixation, significantly higher in G1 than in G2. Torque was higher in G1, but not significantly so. Conclusion: The two different-profile “grafts” present a similar mechanical behavior and can be indistinctly used in clinical practice. Level of evidence V, specialist's opinion based on basic studies.ATHA EDITORA2019-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522019000300136Acta Ortopédica Brasileira v.27 n.3 2019reponame:Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1590/1413-785220192703188112info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarbieri,Cláudio HenriqueGarcia-Mandarano Filho,Luizeng2019-05-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-78522019000300136Revistahttp://www.actaortopedica.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php1atha@uol.com.br||actaortopedicabrasileira@uol.com.br1809-44061413-7852opendoar:2019-05-27T00:00Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv BIOMECHANICS OF BONE BLOCK GRAFT MODELS OF DIFFERENT GEOMETRY
title BIOMECHANICS OF BONE BLOCK GRAFT MODELS OF DIFFERENT GEOMETRY
spellingShingle BIOMECHANICS OF BONE BLOCK GRAFT MODELS OF DIFFERENT GEOMETRY
Barbieri,Cláudio Henrique
Internal fixation of fractures
Bone transplantation
Complications
Pseudarthrosis
title_short BIOMECHANICS OF BONE BLOCK GRAFT MODELS OF DIFFERENT GEOMETRY
title_full BIOMECHANICS OF BONE BLOCK GRAFT MODELS OF DIFFERENT GEOMETRY
title_fullStr BIOMECHANICS OF BONE BLOCK GRAFT MODELS OF DIFFERENT GEOMETRY
title_full_unstemmed BIOMECHANICS OF BONE BLOCK GRAFT MODELS OF DIFFERENT GEOMETRY
title_sort BIOMECHANICS OF BONE BLOCK GRAFT MODELS OF DIFFERENT GEOMETRY
author Barbieri,Cláudio Henrique
author_facet Barbieri,Cláudio Henrique
Garcia-Mandarano Filho,Luiz
author_role author
author2 Garcia-Mandarano Filho,Luiz
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barbieri,Cláudio Henrique
Garcia-Mandarano Filho,Luiz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Internal fixation of fractures
Bone transplantation
Complications
Pseudarthrosis
topic Internal fixation of fractures
Bone transplantation
Complications
Pseudarthrosis
description ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the mechanical behavior of different geometry bone block grafts in wooden models. Methods: Constructs with rectangular (G1) and trapezoidal (G2) profile “grafts”, fixed with 3.5 mm 8-hole dynamic compression plates were submitted to non-destructive bending, with the load applied alternately on the same surface as that of the plate fixation (upper) and on the opposite surface (lower), and torsion tests. A 50 N maximum load for bending and a 5° maximum deformation for torsion were considered. Rigidity (N/mm) was recorded for the former and torque (N.m) was recorded for the latter. Results: Rigidity was consistently higher in G2 than in G1, but not significantly so for all comparisons. The exception was for the load applied on the same surface of plate fixation, significantly higher in G1 than in G2. Torque was higher in G1, but not significantly so. Conclusion: The two different-profile “grafts” present a similar mechanical behavior and can be indistinctly used in clinical practice. Level of evidence V, specialist's opinion based on basic studies.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522019000300136
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522019000300136
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1413-785220192703188112
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ATHA EDITORA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ATHA EDITORA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Ortopédica Brasileira v.27 n.3 2019
reponame:Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron:SBOT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron_str SBOT
institution SBOT
reponame_str Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
collection Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv 1atha@uol.com.br||actaortopedicabrasileira@uol.com.br
_version_ 1752122276432576512