THE RESULTS OF A COMPARISON OF A BRAZILIAN AND AN IMPORTED KNEE PROSTHESIS - 5 YEARS OF FOLLOW-UP

• Autor(a) principal: CALEGARI,JOAO HENRIQUE COSTA
• Data de Publicação: 2022
• Outros Autores: MARQUEZE,THIAGO CAVALCANTE COELHO, KADRI,OMAR SHARID TEIXEIRA EL, PEREIRA,EIKE JEFFERSON GALDINO, QUEIROZ,ALEXANDRE OLIVEIRA, BIGNARDI,PAULO ROBERTO, DANIELI,MARCUS VINICIUS, GUERREIRO,JOÃO PAULO FERNANDES
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Online)
• Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522022000100213
• topic: Arthroplasty; Replacement; Knee; Knee prosthesis

ABSTRACT Introduction To compare the functional results, satisfaction rates, and revisions of total knee arthroplasties performed by the same surgical team using either Brazilian or imported implants, with a minimum follow-up of 5 years after surgery. Materials and Methods A retrospective cohort study analyzing the medical records and interviews of patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty with Brazilian or imported implants with a minimum of 5 years after surgery. Results One hundred and fifty patients were evaluated (164 knees). In the functional questionnaire, 71% of patients had favorable answers in the group of patients who underwent surgery using the Brazilian prosthesis and 74.8% in the group with imported implants (p=0.634). There was no statistical difference in satisfaction between the groups, with 78.4% of patients satisfied or very satisfied in the Brazilian implant group and 90.7% in the imported implant group (p=0.053). Loosening of the implants was reported in 5.3% versus 4.7% (p>0.999). Conclusion The total knee arthroplasties performed by the same surgical team with a minimum follow-up period of 5 years showed similar levels of satisfaction, function, and complications with both the Brazilian and imported implants. Level of Evidence III, cohort study.