Functional assessment of endoprosthesis in the treatment of bone tumors

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fukumothi,Denis Kiyoshi
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Pupo,Hiran, Reganin,Luciano Augusto, Matte,Silvia Raquel Fricke, Lima,Bruno Spagnuolo de, Mattos,Carlos Augusto de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162016000500569
Resumo: ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the functional grade of these patients and to identify the types of complications found that influenced the average life span of endoprostheses the functions of the operated limb. METHODS: We analyzed 14 post-operative cases of endoprosthesis, patients with malignant bone tumors and aggressive benign bone tumors submitted to surgery between 2004 and 2014. The evaluation system used was proposed by Enneking, recommended by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS), in addition to the radiologic evaluation. RESULTS: Endoprosthesis are excellent choices for the treatment of bone tumors with limb preservation in relation to pain, strength, and patient's emotional acceptance. Another factor for good results is the immediate weight-bearing capacity, generating a greater independence. CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that all patients classified the therapy as excellent/good, regardless of the type of prosthesis used, extent of injury, and/or type of tumor resection performed.
id SBOT-2_09d05c6faec154056d71005fde7971db
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-36162016000500569
network_acronym_str SBOT-2
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Functional assessment of endoprosthesis in the treatment of bone tumorsBone neoplasmsReconstructive surgical proceduresJoint prosthesisLimb salvageABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the functional grade of these patients and to identify the types of complications found that influenced the average life span of endoprostheses the functions of the operated limb. METHODS: We analyzed 14 post-operative cases of endoprosthesis, patients with malignant bone tumors and aggressive benign bone tumors submitted to surgery between 2004 and 2014. The evaluation system used was proposed by Enneking, recommended by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS), in addition to the radiologic evaluation. RESULTS: Endoprosthesis are excellent choices for the treatment of bone tumors with limb preservation in relation to pain, strength, and patient's emotional acceptance. Another factor for good results is the immediate weight-bearing capacity, generating a greater independence. CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that all patients classified the therapy as excellent/good, regardless of the type of prosthesis used, extent of injury, and/or type of tumor resection performed.Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia2016-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162016000500569Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.51 n.5 2016reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1016/j.rboe.2016.08.012info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFukumothi,Denis KiyoshiPupo,HiranReganin,Luciano AugustoMatte,Silvia Raquel FrickeLima,Bruno Spagnuolo deMattos,Carlos Augusto deeng2016-11-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-36162016000500569Revistahttp://www.rbo.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbo@sbot.org.br1982-43780102-3616opendoar:2016-11-18T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Functional assessment of endoprosthesis in the treatment of bone tumors
title Functional assessment of endoprosthesis in the treatment of bone tumors
spellingShingle Functional assessment of endoprosthesis in the treatment of bone tumors
Fukumothi,Denis Kiyoshi
Bone neoplasms
Reconstructive surgical procedures
Joint prosthesis
Limb salvage
title_short Functional assessment of endoprosthesis in the treatment of bone tumors
title_full Functional assessment of endoprosthesis in the treatment of bone tumors
title_fullStr Functional assessment of endoprosthesis in the treatment of bone tumors
title_full_unstemmed Functional assessment of endoprosthesis in the treatment of bone tumors
title_sort Functional assessment of endoprosthesis in the treatment of bone tumors
author Fukumothi,Denis Kiyoshi
author_facet Fukumothi,Denis Kiyoshi
Pupo,Hiran
Reganin,Luciano Augusto
Matte,Silvia Raquel Fricke
Lima,Bruno Spagnuolo de
Mattos,Carlos Augusto de
author_role author
author2 Pupo,Hiran
Reganin,Luciano Augusto
Matte,Silvia Raquel Fricke
Lima,Bruno Spagnuolo de
Mattos,Carlos Augusto de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fukumothi,Denis Kiyoshi
Pupo,Hiran
Reganin,Luciano Augusto
Matte,Silvia Raquel Fricke
Lima,Bruno Spagnuolo de
Mattos,Carlos Augusto de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bone neoplasms
Reconstructive surgical procedures
Joint prosthesis
Limb salvage
topic Bone neoplasms
Reconstructive surgical procedures
Joint prosthesis
Limb salvage
description ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the functional grade of these patients and to identify the types of complications found that influenced the average life span of endoprostheses the functions of the operated limb. METHODS: We analyzed 14 post-operative cases of endoprosthesis, patients with malignant bone tumors and aggressive benign bone tumors submitted to surgery between 2004 and 2014. The evaluation system used was proposed by Enneking, recommended by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS), in addition to the radiologic evaluation. RESULTS: Endoprosthesis are excellent choices for the treatment of bone tumors with limb preservation in relation to pain, strength, and patient's emotional acceptance. Another factor for good results is the immediate weight-bearing capacity, generating a greater independence. CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that all patients classified the therapy as excellent/good, regardless of the type of prosthesis used, extent of injury, and/or type of tumor resection performed.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162016000500569
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162016000500569
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.rboe.2016.08.012
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.51 n.5 2016
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron:SBOT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron_str SBOT
institution SBOT
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbo@sbot.org.br
_version_ 1752122360473845760

Registros relacionados